What would you do with the second amendment?

[kaz]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

 

[kaz]

I picked start following the Constitution which does not give government any power over our gun rights

 

[rightwinger]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Restrictions on guns should be as limited as the restrictions on free speech

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

The meaning is clear so all gun laws are unconstitutional. That said, absent incorporation progressives would be constitutionally free to attempt to ban guns at the state level. But since they insist everything be a federal issue they have no leg to stand on.

Regardless of the Constitution, however, people have the right to defend themselves.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Enforce it to the maximum!

E'erbody gets machine guns and silencers!

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

Shall not be infringe is pretty damn specific.

 

[kaz]

Enforce it to the maximum!

E'erbody gets machine guns and silencers!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

 

[Rustic]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

Dog whistle for firearm confiscation, that’s what sensible gun regulations mean

 

[danielpalos]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

That is easy. We should solve all of our security problems in our free States, with our Second Amendment.

 

[DJT for Life]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

Yours is the correct answer.

If you dumped every regulation right now...nothing would change. The vast,
overwhelming majority aren't going to harm anybody. Never have and never
will.

 

[danielpalos]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

Yours is the correct answer.

If you dumped every regulation right now...nothing would change. The vast,
overwhelming majority aren't going to harm anybody. Never have and never
will.

The People are the Militia.

 

[danielpalos]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

Yours is the correct answer.

If you dumped every regulation right now...nothing would change. The vast,
overwhelming majority aren't going to harm anybody. Never have and never
will.

And, the law of large numbers, always applies.

Hence, why safety regulations are trying to "keep it down to a dull roar."

 

[DJT for Life]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

The problems with your so called "sensible" gun regulations are that they only affect law abiding citizens.

Yours is the correct answer.

If you dumped every regulation right now...nothing would change. The vast,
overwhelming majority aren't going to harm anybody. Never have and never
will.

The People are the Militia.

Agreed.

...and the people are also the government.

 

[yiostheoy]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

Funny how great minds all seem to think alike on this matter.

 

[yiostheoy]

The slippery slope to violating the 2nd Amendment began with laws about freed slaves having guns after the U.S. Civil War.

This was followed with gangsters not allowed to have submachine guns legally (it is very expensive to get a license) and then nobody having them.

This then led to a ban on automatic rifles, after these were finally invented shortly before WW2.

Then we got Slick Willy's ban on semi auto high cap mag rifles like the AR's and the AK's. (The Ruger's luckily were exempt from the ban.)

The whole situation is a mess now.

And the majority of the population is anti gun and gun fearing.

 

[danielpalos]

The slippery slope to violating the 2nd Amendment began with laws about freed slaves having guns after the U.S. Civil War.

This was followed with gangsters not allowed to have submachine guns legally (it is very expensive to get a license) and then nobody having them.

This then led to a ban on automatic rifles, after these were finally invented shortly before WW2.

Then we got Slick Willy's ban on semi auto high cap mag rifles like the AR's and the AK's. (The Ruger's luckily were exempt from the ban.)

The whole situation is a mess now.

And the majority of the population is anti gun and gun fearing.

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary to the security of our free States.

 

[miketx]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Name them.