So because I stated that this wasn't something I was worried about I can't worry about more than one thing at a time? What an asinine comment.why is you you cant worry about more than one thing?
Yet here you are, forming opinions about the statement before you have even read the transcript or seen comment made yourself...and here you are posting somewhat confrontational responses to others who have looked into it a bit? Wow...that seems silly to me.I will have to see the show or a transcript of it to determine.
I don't watch Scarborough...so I have no personal stake in this fight. I couldn't tell you whether he is left or right leaning...I have no clue. I have no clue whether he likes Bush, hates Bush, supported the war, doesn't, likes Thompson, hates Thompson... I read about his comment...and the fact that if the blogger is accurate, it doesn't sound like it was a crazy random comment, but rather a classless comment following a silly train of thought. No defense...just a closer look at the issue.Why is it you are chosing to defend Joe?
They may not...but considering some of the disgusting treatment other political wives have received (i.e. Laura Bush's mock rape, Mrs. Edwards' fat comments) I don't think that Mrs. Thompson's aerobic strip classes being brought up is a big deal. Obviously she isn't shy about it either if she is going to aerobic strip classes.You see that is fine it wouldnt bother you but other women would not appreciate beig associated as a stripper.
LOL. Another ridiculous statement. I didn't decide anything for them. In fact, I stated that the comment was unworthy of a news commentary show. But youre ignoring that because it doesn't fit what you wanted to write.You dont get to decide for them.
As long as we see you screeching about the comments made about Laura Bush and Condeleeza Rice...the jokes about Cheney and Bush...the comments made about Laura Edwards and Hillary Clinton....I am holding to a certain standard and applying it acrossed the board.
Thats big of you...I dont even what the Rs families to be treated like this.
I find it interesting that you found no need to mention the treatment of Laura Bush and Condeleeza Rice this year. LOL. ANOTHER asinine comment. The two issues (Thompson and Chelsea Clinton) have very little to do with one another.I do find it interesting you found no need to mention the treatment of Chelsy Clinton when she was 11?
Them's small potatoes next to Glen Becks statements about Dennis Kucinich's wife needing cyanide to have sex with him. Just another no class creep.
As far as I can tell, he was not charged with a crime and has since gone on to another career. So what does this have to do with him saying something classless on his show?Joe Scarborough was a R representative who was forced to retire when shortly after his relelction his young female aid was found dead in his office.
Um...the topic at hand was Mrs. Thompson, not Chelsea. Since you have made it SO obvious that Chelsea is an important side issue to you, I have addressed it. At this point, you continuing to bring it up indicates that you aren't reading my posts or you don't understand my posts...please let me know which one it is. If you aren't reading my posts, I'll stop writing to you. If you are having trouble understanding that I found what the media did to Chelsea Clinton disgusting and what Scarborough said not worth this amount of typing...let me know...I'll try again to restate my position.I mentioned chelsey eariler yet you chose to only comment on thompson's wife.
Are you referring to the Laura Bush story, the Laura Edwards story, the Condeleeza Rice story?I am not even aware of those other stories.
See above. There is nothing wrong with you being unaware of a news story....unless you have already stated that you are here to apply a higher standard across the board.So why do you assume I should be commenting on stories that I have never heard before?
All of them.BTW which one of those other stories where on national news?