Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What I write is in normal format. Material sourced (cut and paste) is in italics.Do you always try to pass or cut and paste jobs as your own?Only if you ignore that our form of government is a Republic, not a pure democracy.
A republic formed with several "compromises" both great and small to turn it from one that had representation proportional to the populations each state represented, to one which gave superior comparative powers to states with the low population density or small overall size.
The Great Compromise gave larger states more say in the House of Representatives by tying representation there to state population, while keeping state representation equal in the Senate by giving each state two votes
The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignore
Change your display settings if you can't tell one from the other.
Hard to identify your source when your post is a hodgepodge of made up stuff.What I write is in normal format. Material sourced (cut and paste) is in italics.Do you always try to pass or cut and paste jobs as your own?Only if you ignore that our form of government is a Republic, not a pure democracy.
A republic formed with several "compromises" both great and small to turn it from one that had representation proportional to the populations each state represented, to one which gave superior comparative powers to states with the low population density or small overall size.
The Great Compromise gave larger states more say in the House of Representatives by tying representation there to state population, while keeping state representation equal in the Senate by giving each state two votes
The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignore
Change your display settings if you can't tell one from the other.
I'm sorry but you don't get to write your own rules for what you wish to post.
Please show us where it states in the rules that you may copy and paste something, without the source and link, if it is not copyrighted material. Show us too where in the rules it says that if you post something in italics, then it is not your material, but rather material you have plagiarized from another source.
Why are you afraid to post your source?
From that bastion of Conservatism, UCLACommon republican claim, not supported by facts. The economy improved between 1933 and 1936 with FDR's policies in place. It wasn't until 1937 when FDR listened to the conservatives and instead of continuing his policies instead adopted a conservative budget, based on reducing the deficits, did the recovery falter.
historynewsnetwork.org
He clearly doesn’t want us to see the rest of the work by whomever he is trying to steal material from.What I write is in normal format. Material sourced (cut and paste) is in italics.Do you always try to pass or cut and paste jobs as your own?Only if you ignore that our form of government is a Republic, not a pure democracy.
A republic formed with several "compromises" both great and small to turn it from one that had representation proportional to the populations each state represented, to one which gave superior comparative powers to states with the low population density or small overall size.
The Great Compromise gave larger states more say in the House of Representatives by tying representation there to state population, while keeping state representation equal in the Senate by giving each state two votes
The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignore
Change your display settings if you can't tell one from the other.
I'm sorry but you don't get to write your own rules for what you wish to post.
Please show us where it states in the rules that you may copy and paste something, without the source and link, if it is not copyrighted material. Show us too where in the rules it says that if you post something in italics, then it is not your material, but rather material you have plagiarized from another source.
Why are you afraid to post your source?
From that bastion of Conservatism, UCLA
FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
By Meg Sullivan August 10, 2004
Two UCLA economists say they have figured out why the Great Depression dragged on for almost 15 years, and they blame a suspect previously thought to be beyond reproach: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Newsroom
The Constitution can be suspended legally only by declaration of martial law.
P.S. He clearly doesn’t want us to see the rest of the work by whomever he is trying to steal material from.
You mean like the "newsroom" link that doesn't work?
historynewsnetwork.org
From that bastion of Conservatism, UCLACommon republican claim, not supported by facts. The economy improved between 1933 and 1936 with FDR's policies in place. It wasn't until 1937 when FDR listened to the conservatives and instead of continuing his policies instead adopted a conservative budget, based on reducing the deficits, did the recovery falter.
FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA economists calculate
By Meg Sullivan August 10, 2004
Two UCLA economists say they have figured out why the Great Depression dragged on for almost 15 years, and they blame a suspect previously thought to be beyond reproach: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Pay particular attention to that last line, written FOURTEEN YEARS AGO!
Boy sit down, they tell you what to do and you obey the orders...I have been telling you that the 2nd amendment will not save you, you can use your pistol and play thieves vs police in your backyard now.Politicians have ORDERED us to pretend we don’t have rights...Do we follow their orders without any pushback or do we challenge their right to impose such orders?
What do concessions such as theses lead to?
Politicians have ORDERED us to pretend we don’t have rights...Do we follow their orders without any pushback or do we challenge their right to impose such orders?
What do concessions such as theses lead to?
The Constitution has always been optional to tRumplings.
Cuomo is a Republican?The Constitution has always been optional to tRumplings.
Although there is federal order for this, states are issuing orders to "stay-at-home", without referring to any legislation, or constitutional power to do it. In some states, police can stop any motorist and ask where they are going. If they aren’t going to a doctor or the store, they can be charged with a misdemeanor. That's for now, which makes me wonder what else is coming.
So we are all still being isolated by a virus with a death rate similar to the flu. I know the numbers seem high but they are counting every death by a person with the virus as being caused by the flu even it the person would have died anyway. If they would separate the the death of those died by the virus and those that died with the virus we would have an idea of how serious this vires is to people without underlying conditions and maybe we wouldn't unnecessarily bankrupt our nation.It's clear we are now a nation of sheep willing giving up our God Given Rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
We used to have a right to free assembly and a right to attend the Church of our choice but now we can only do those things if our government allows it.
We have now given the government the power to restrict our movement to what the government allows. No more gatherings of like minded people able to discuss problems that interest them. Our Republic was by created by like minded people meeting in taverns and Churches a couple centuries ago, and we now have given up the Right to meet in those same locations by order of the government.
Many flaws in your thinking. The first is that like in WWII as in this pandemic war, the government is again restricting travel. We are but a step from the imposition of rationing of vital goods.
Secondly the idea of the people meeting in churches and taverns has been technologically replaced, as this forum you're posting on attests to. Ironic that you arguing against doing what you're doing remotely and advocate requiring meeting face to face to accomplish such a meeting of minds.
Although there is federal order for this, states are issuing orders to "stay-at-home", without referring to any legislation, or constitutional power to do it. In some states, police can stop any motorist and ask where they are going. If they aren’t going to a doctor or the store, they can be charged with a misdemeanor. That's for now, which makes me wonder what else is coming.
It's well established that the government can order you OUT of your home. To evacuate you, even by force of law from your home when a storm, or fire, or community disaster occurs.
What's the constitutional difference between being ordered to stay OUT from being ordered to stay IN?
Politicians have ORDERED us to pretend we don’t have rights...Do we follow their orders without any pushback or do we challenge their right to impose such orders?
What do concessions such as theses lead to?
Every part of the constitution, especially the amendments, are a fundamental basis for our laws. But as nobody could forsee every possible future happenstance, the USSC has repeatedly ruled that even a strict interpretation does not stand if there is a "compelling government interest" against it.
It's the classic case of a law against yelling "fire" in a crowded theatre, being in direct contradiction to the 1st amendment right to free speech.
But these exceptions are not limitless, and there needs to be a showing of how "compelling" that government interest is. In overturning the Stolen Valor law (United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012), United States Supreme Court struck down a portion of the Stolen Valor Act)
The swine flu (H1N1) had tests and a vaccine. And in the end resulted in 20% of the people catching it, but less than 20,000 fatalities from it.Why would the chance be any greater than the chance of contracting the Swine flu was, less than 20%?
