Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just to be clear here...which "damage" would that be? The record high market numbers? Or the record low unemployment numbers? The record high median income maybe?Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Leave it to marxist socialists to consider unprecedented prosperity to be "damage". In other words, damage to their desire to continue to mooch for more.
yep, I said that in error, over reaction on my part. The precedence none the less was due to the '92 Biden rule. I posted the link.and?Off the top of my head two, Clarence Thomas and now Brett Kavanaugh. Both nominees from republican presidents. Correct me if there are any others. I know there are at least 11 nominations that didn't go through for many different reasons. But do tell, how many? And I want to know which nominees besides Garland, didn't get nominated since the 60s from a democratic president?where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.
How many nominees for the SC have been accused of sexual abuse?
Remember the Biden rule of '92 that stopped George Bush nominee in 1992.
Actually the Biden rule was prophylactic, there was no Bush nominee at the time he invoked it and none came up.
.
You claimed it stopped a Bush nominee in 1992, it didn't. No need to be lose with the facts like the commies.
.
I gave you a link, go read the list. One not to go to a hearing from that link:Off the top of my head two, Clarence Thomas and now Brett Kavanaugh. Both nominees from republican presidents. Correct me if there are any others. I know there are at least 11 nominations that didn't go through for many different reasons. But do tell, how many? And I want to know which nominees besides Garland, didn't get nominated since the 60s from a democratic president?where's the precedence for such an investigation for a nominee to the supreme court? that's how we run our government by precedence.
How many nominees for the SC have been accused of sexual abuse?
Remember the Biden rule of '92 that stopped George Bush nominee in 1992.
Again, how many didn’t get hearings?
here, go look it up..
Unsuccessful nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia
Again, which ones didn’t get hearings?
You really don’t know much.
Blaming the left ,blaming Hillary??who really cares? if you still expect anyone believe it was about a woman who had no desire to testify and not delaying the confirmation then you are just trying to see who you think you can still keep playing.The investigation authorized by The President just completed is being released at the moment. What say you.
His partisanship ALONE are grounds to disqualify him
I didn't see any partisanship.
Are you having bad dreams?
Just to be clear here...which "damage" would that be? The record high market numbers? Or the record low unemployment numbers? The record high median income maybe?Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Leave it to marxist socialists to consider unprecedented prosperity to be "damage". In other words, damage to their desire to continue to mooch for more.
I'll respond with a question:
Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
neither am I. It seems you judge people just because they follow an organization. Let me educate you on something, there is no party or organization that will fit 100% in one's life. To think otherwise merely makes you the fool.Im not throwing away my integrity for partisanship and im the dummy LOL
You cant make this shit up!
I don't agree with everything the GOP does. And I definitely don't agree with the left at all. I don't do evil.
If I am to gain anything, I must compromise my wants to get something rather than nothing. it seems you don't believe that. Oh well.
For anyone to think they get everything is just plain stupid and unreasonable in every level of life. Compromise is all you get. one must make the compromise closest to their beliefs. And at the moment, that is trump. His demeanor doesn't bother me in the least. I compromised his lack of demeanor for his knowledge of business and bullheadedness. Yep, I am willing to compromise. It seems you aren't. you will never fit anywhere without it.
I gave you a link, go read the list. One not to go to a hearing from that link:Off the top of my head two, Clarence Thomas and now Brett Kavanaugh. Both nominees from republican presidents. Correct me if there are any others. I know there are at least 11 nominations that didn't go through for many different reasons. But do tell, how many? And I want to know which nominees besides Garland, didn't get nominated since the 60s from a democratic president?How many nominees for the SC have been accused of sexual abuse?
Remember the Biden rule of '92 that stopped George Bush nominee in 1992.
Again, how many didn’t get hearings?
here, go look it up..
Unsuccessful nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia
Again, which ones didn’t get hearings?
You really don’t know much.
"In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House."
Yep, he's lost so much money that he's a billionaireneither am I. It seems you judge people just because they follow an organization. Let me educate you on something, there is no party or organization that will fit 100% in one's life. To think otherwise merely makes you the fool.Im not throwing away my integrity for partisanship and im the dummy LOL
You cant make this shit up!
I don't agree with everything the GOP does. And I definitely don't agree with the left at all. I don't do evil.
If I am to gain anything, I must compromise my wants to get something rather than nothing. it seems you don't believe that. Oh well.
For anyone to think they get everything is just plain stupid and unreasonable in every level of life. Compromise is all you get. one must make the compromise closest to their beliefs. And at the moment, that is trump. His demeanor doesn't bother me in the least. I compromised his lack of demeanor for his knowledge of business and bullheadedness. Yep, I am willing to compromise. It seems you aren't. you will never fit anywhere without it.
Trump's business knowledge!!! Don't make me laugh. The only thing Trump knows how to do is to lose money. Other than money laundering and declaring bankruptcy, Trump knows jack shit about business. American banks won't lend to him and all those buildings with his name on them are owned by someone else.
that wasn't your question.I gave you a link, go read the list. One not to go to a hearing from that link:Off the top of my head two, Clarence Thomas and now Brett Kavanaugh. Both nominees from republican presidents. Correct me if there are any others. I know there are at least 11 nominations that didn't go through for many different reasons. But do tell, how many? And I want to know which nominees besides Garland, didn't get nominated since the 60s from a democratic president?
Remember the Biden rule of '92 that stopped George Bush nominee in 1992.
Again, how many didn’t get hearings?
here, go look it up..
Unsuccessful nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia
Again, which ones didn’t get hearings?
You really don’t know much.
"In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House."
Yeah, the President withdrew the nomination idiot. That wasn’t the Senate refusing to hold hearings.
You don’t even read your own links do you?
Most importantly, Kavanaugh gets approved soon, and sworn in. But even better, Dems lose 3 to 4 seats in the Senate and gain only 10 to 12 in the House in November all because oh this crap.
The lingering question will be, did they learn from this?
I’m hoping they will, but I doubt it.
I think Democrats will lose alot of seats in both houses. There will be a huge backlash for this despicable stunt they pulled.
Yep, all those many women who have been sexually assaulted will stay home and vote for Republicans. All those Democrats will swing to the far right and vote for Republicans, and all those Independents will vote for one party control of the three branches of Government, which will fulfill their dreams and vote for Republicans.
Yes Virginia, McConnell seems likely to win the battle, but the war will be decided by the Majority of the People. Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Dipshit here ^^^^^ thinks women are so stupid they can’t see the con job the Dems did.
Why do you think women are stupid?
I've reported this post as off topic and a personal attack. I would tell you about what I think about you, but it would be against the rules (apparently) and be an honest and very critical description of you and your character.
sorry to interject, but how is this off topic when the title is 'what say you'? isn't that his say? just saying.Most importantly, Kavanaugh gets approved soon, and sworn in. But even better, Dems lose 3 to 4 seats in the Senate and gain only 10 to 12 in the House in November all because oh this crap.
The lingering question will be, did they learn from this?
I’m hoping they will, but I doubt it.
I think Democrats will lose alot of seats in both houses. There will be a huge backlash for this despicable stunt they pulled.
Yep, all those many women who have been sexually assaulted will stay home and vote for Republicans. All those Democrats will swing to the far right and vote for Republicans, and all those Independents will vote for one party control of the three branches of Government, which will fulfill their dreams and vote for Republicans.
Yes Virginia, McConnell seems likely to win the battle, but the war will be decided by the Majority of the People. Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Dipshit here ^^^^^ thinks women are so stupid they can’t see the con job the Dems did.
Why do you think women are stupid?
I've reported this post as off topic and a personal attack. I would tell you about what I think about you, but it would be against the rules (apparently) and be an honest and very critical description of you and your character.
you board that shit boat and to hell will all the trump vipersJust to be clear here...which "damage" would that be? The record high market numbers? Or the record low unemployment numbers? The record high median income maybe?Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Leave it to marxist socialists to consider unprecedented prosperity to be "damage". In other words, damage to their desire to continue to mooch for more.
I'll respond with a question:
Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
He united enough to win the presidency, it's you commies spreading division by not accepting the results of the election. Get on board and enjoy the ride.
.
you board that shit boat and to hell will all the trump vipersJust to be clear here...which "damage" would that be? The record high market numbers? Or the record low unemployment numbers? The record high median income maybe?Keep in mind that Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and those who voted for the other candidates seem very motivated to repair the damage done by McConnell, Ryan and Trump&Co.
Leave it to marxist socialists to consider unprecedented prosperity to be "damage". In other words, damage to their desire to continue to mooch for more.
I'll respond with a question:
Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
He united enough to win the presidency, it's you commies spreading division by not accepting the results of the election. Get on board and enjoy the ride.
.
I didnt believe the accusations. At least the one by ford. I have no doubt he showed his penis to women. Thats pretty much normal with kids. Just like chicks showing their tits.
I do not want him confirmed. That is only because of his judicial record.
Fuck Brett Kavfefe
Imagine how much better Washington would be if the Clinton's plane crashed in the Atlantic.Blaming the left ,blaming Hillary??who really cares? if you still expect anyone believe it was about a woman who had no desire to testify and not delaying the confirmation then you are just trying to see who you think you can still keep playing.The investigation authorized by The President just completed is being released at the moment. What say you.
His partisanship ALONE are grounds to disqualify him
I didn't see any partisanship.
Are you having bad dreams?
He was blaming the people who have been attacking him and his family.
Unfortunately, those people are democrats and the Clintons.
The Clintons have had him in there sights for decades. Ever since Clinton's impeachment.
Honest (and accurate answer): a divider compared to Ronald Reagan, a uniter compared to Barack Obama.Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
Honest (and accurate answer): a divider compared to Ronald Reagan, a uniter compared to Barack Obama.
It's 100% true. You know it. I know it. The citizens of the U.S. know it. Nobody ever divided this nation like MaObama did. He went out of his way to divide the American people by race ("the police acted stupidly", "if I had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin"), by class ("the rich must pay their fair share"), by political affiliation ("Republicans can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in the back seat"), and more. If there was a category out there, he would find away to leverage it to divide people. Divide and conquer. He studied under marxists and communists. He learned well.Is Trump a uniter or a divider?
Honest (and accurate answer): a divider compared to Ronald Reagan, a uniter compared to Barack Obama.
Your equivocation is neither accurate nor honest.
