CDZ What Is USAID And Does It Matter ?

Monk-Eye

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2018
3,227
790
140
" What Is USAID And Does It Matter ? "

* A Valid Objective Requiring A Better Definition Of Religion As Creed *


There should not be any distinction in understanding between the term religion and the term creed .

There is not an exception within first amendment of us constitution for a creed which violates non violence principles , thus there is not an exception within first amendment of us constitution for a religion which violates non violence principles .

Illegitimate aggression is violence , self defense against violence of legitimate aggression , hence not all aggression is illegitimate .

An example of violence against individualism could be defined as valid threats for acts , or acts , of illegitimate aggression against self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) or self determination ( private property , willful intents - contracts ) elements .

Non aggression principles specify that all aggression is illegitimate .

* Exemplifying Directives Of Foundation Documents For Creed As A Religion *

Could it be established that the qurayn includes edicts and tenets of creed to implement illegitimate aggression of violence against individualism as defined above ?


* USAID As Explained By Us Government *

 
USAID_ISIS.jpg
 
Omar is going to get an ass chewing from the Democrats' Wall Street master. USAID is one of the corporate welfare arms of the Federal govt. that goes around the world building infrastructure for corporate factory towns so they can move their U.S. plants to Mexico and overseas. they built the buildings, power plants, sewer and water systems, and roads for all those Mexican maquilla plants along the borders, for instance, so Ford and other manufacturers could ship themselves stuff from outside the country cheap and everyone will be told it's 'free trade' with foreign countries n stuff and get big giant tax breaks as well as all the advantages of police state labor racketeering scams.

You didn't really think those corps and their shareholders would pay for that stuff themselves, did you? lol lol lol quit being silly.
 
Last edited:
" Question On Feasibility Of Participation Schedules "

* Libertarian Aristocratic Bourgeois Versus Authoritarian Bureaucratic Proletariat And Availability Of Currency *


Omar is going to get an ass chewing from the Democrats' Wall Street master. USAID is one of the corporate welfare arms of the Federal govt. that goes around the world building infrastructure for corporate factory towns so they can move their U.S. plants to Mexico and overseas. they built the buildings, power plants, sewer and water systems, and roads for all those Mexican maquilla plants along the borders, for instance, so Ford and other manufacturers could ship themselves stuff from outside the country cheap and everyone will be told it's 'free trade' with foreign countries n stuff and get big giant tax breaks as well as all the advantages of police state labor racketeering scams.
You didn't really think those corps and their shareholders would pay for that stuff themselves, did you? lol lol lol quit being silly.
The property tax assessors representing bureaucratic collectives lack clarity for the supply and demand for fiat currency .

Budgets issue a few hundred million here , a trillion there ; the estimated numbers are rounded in blocks to be dispensed with sufficient proof of competed and completed contracts for some objective within the project scope .

It seems there may be oceans of currency collected and distributed by government both disproportionately and excessively through selectivism .

Where direct taxes on property and indirect taxes on commerce are collected by a state or local government , the financial liquidity of workers is often less than preferable given special endowment from government for its own pet projects .

Am once posed a question weighing whether special endowment from government , or selectivism , was any more or less ethical than equal endowment from government , or egalitarianism .

An answer was received proposing that selectivism is more legitimate because those competing to be selected are capable of satisfying the role to complete the objectives .

* Cooperative Group Third Tier Twist From A Citizen Member Perspective *

The query was presented when nasa was seeking to provide contracts to private companies for independent development of space exploration technology , most likely without any caveat of indemnity to initial investors - us taxpayers being acquired from private endeavors post funded development .

A proposition to rectify the disparity was a notion termed " a public private trust " where capital for any government funded development program directed to a private or publicly traded company would be exchanged for some portion in shares of stock in said company , as occurs in some forms of state capitalism when a bureaucracy engages in free enterprise .

In contrast with state capitalism where a bureaucracy manages the accounts for state interests , after the exchange of funds for shares of stock occurs , the shares of stock shares are fractionally credited by egalitarianism to each living us citizen member while the fractional share remain bound with the stock value .

The state control over the portfolio is removed upon dispersement and an open source consortium manages the public private trust .
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top