What is the Biden doctorine?

[hadit]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

 

[task0778]

The Biden Doctrine is actually quite easy to articulate: If it's good for the Democratic Party, we'll do it! Whether it helps America or not is beside the point.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Bobob]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Bobob]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

 

[theHawk]

How would you articulate the overall theme and direction of the Biden Admininstration‘s policies?

It seems to me he is pushing a far left agenda.

I found the Biden Doctrine:

 

[hadit]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

Quid Pro is POTUS, in case you hadn't noticed. TRUMP! is not, also in case you didn't notice. That means we ARE interested in Quid Pro's doctrine and how he's going to govern while we don't care what TRUMP!'s doctrine was because he's no longer in office, in case you didn't notice. I have noticed something from the campaign that continues to this day. During the campaign I would ask repeatedly why people were voting for Quid Pro, and save for maybe one or two, no one could articulate a reason that didn't involve TRUMP!. Today, Quid Pro is in office and the phenomenon continues with criticism. Quid Pro's sycophants can't seem to defend or promote him without referencing TRUMP!. You'd think somebody with almost 50 years in office would generate more enthusiasm than that. Guess not.

 

[Bobob]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

Quid Pro is POTUS, in case you hadn't noticed. TRUMP! is not, also in case you didn't notice. That means we ARE interested in Quid Pro's doctrine and how he's going to govern while we don't care what TRUMP!'s doctrine was because he's no longer in office, in case you didn't notice. I have noticed something from the campaign that continues to this day. During the campaign I would ask repeatedly why people were voting for Quid Pro, and save for maybe one or two, no one could articulate a reason that didn't involve TRUMP!. Today, Quid Pro is in office and the phenomenon continues with criticism. Quid Pro's sycophants can't seem to defend or promote him without referencing TRUMP!. You'd think somebody with almost 50 years in office would generate more enthusiasm than that. Guess not.

No one needed to give you a reason, although there were plenty of them. Frankly,
the blob's past was a great reason in itself because you don't want a grifter in the White House, yes? Nobody had a good reason to vote for Trump, except for that "swamp" horseshit, especially when the "swamp" all ended up in the White House.
There is no quid pro-Joe, lamb chop, but there is a Ukraine quid pro-pro blob who lost the election.

 

[hadit]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

Quid Pro is POTUS, in case you hadn't noticed. TRUMP! is not, also in case you didn't notice. That means we ARE interested in Quid Pro's doctrine and how he's going to govern while we don't care what TRUMP!'s doctrine was because he's no longer in office, in case you didn't notice. I have noticed something from the campaign that continues to this day. During the campaign I would ask repeatedly why people were voting for Quid Pro, and save for maybe one or two, no one could articulate a reason that didn't involve TRUMP!. Today, Quid Pro is in office and the phenomenon continues with criticism. Quid Pro's sycophants can't seem to defend or promote him without referencing TRUMP!. You'd think somebody with almost 50 years in office would generate more enthusiasm than that. Guess not.

No one needed to give you a reason, although there were plenty of them. Frankly,
the blob's past was a great reason in itself because you don't want a grifter in the White House, yes? Nobody had a good reason to vote for Trump, except for that "swamp" horseshit, especially when the "swamp" all ended up in the White House.
There is no quid pro-Joe, lamb chop, but there is a Ukraine quid pro-pro blob who lost the election.

Still trying to prove my point, I see because you still want to talk about TRUMP! instead of Quid Pro Joe. News flash, he's not in office any more and can't hurt you any more. Of course, you could show us on the doll where he hurt you but this thread is about Quid Pro Joe's doctrine, so you've wasted enough bandwidth trying to derail it as it is.

 

[Bobob]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

Quid Pro is POTUS, in case you hadn't noticed. TRUMP! is not, also in case you didn't notice. That means we ARE interested in Quid Pro's doctrine and how he's going to govern while we don't care what TRUMP!'s doctrine was because he's no longer in office, in case you didn't notice. I have noticed something from the campaign that continues to this day. During the campaign I would ask repeatedly why people were voting for Quid Pro, and save for maybe one or two, no one could articulate a reason that didn't involve TRUMP!. Today, Quid Pro is in office and the phenomenon continues with criticism. Quid Pro's sycophants can't seem to defend or promote him without referencing TRUMP!. You'd think somebody with almost 50 years in office would generate more enthusiasm than that. Guess not.

No one needed to give you a reason, although there were plenty of them. Frankly,
the blob's past was a great reason in itself because you don't want a grifter in the White House, yes? Nobody had a good reason to vote for Trump, except for that "swamp" horseshit, especially when the "swamp" all ended up in the White House.
There is no quid pro-Joe, lamb chop, but there is a Ukraine quid pro-pro blob who lost the election.

Still trying to prove my point, I see because you still want to talk about TRUMP! instead of Quid Pro Joe. News flash, he's not in office any more and can't hurt you any more. Of course, you could show us on the doll where he hurt you but this thread is about Quid Pro Joe's doctrine, so you've wasted enough bandwidth trying to derail it as it is.

I know what you are trying to do, guy. You can't escape your actions of the past and
be "horrified" about the present because you are not believable.

 

[hadit]

Biden doctrine reads as follow:

Freedom and the Republic is bad. WE must get rid of all liberty and freedom as much as possible.

Biden doctrine.Anono source.

And the trump doctrine?
Mark Zaborowski
"I recently had a comment on another post that insisted I was a tool defending socialism. Further, that I just did not understand that Donald Trump was all about freedom and in no way should be considered “dictator-like”. I responded:
It is amazing how those who get their political education from opinion hosts on TV try to accuse others of the same thing. “Socialism” is the cry whenever a government policy that benefits the average citizen is proposed or promulgated. But you also state that in your view human instinct is dangerous and suspect, and in that we agree. Unfettered capitalism not only recognizes the animal instinct to acquire resources (in this case money and power) but applauds and encourages it. As rational beings, we see the problem of allowing a very few to own everything, of allowing the big fish to eat all the little fish. And yet, when any move is made to curb the voracious appetites of the already wealthy and powerful, it is instantly branded “socialism”. The sad irony is that this political view is espoused by many of those little fishes who are also on the menu.
As far as Trump goes, I agree that he left most of the day-to-day running of his administration to others. He would have made a weak dictator, because he did everything half-assed. Notorious dictators like Mussolini, Hitler and Stalin micromanaged their way into power and held all the reins tightly, through suspicion and paranoia. Trump’s style is more in the way of a hereditary monarch, one raised in luxury and surrounded by functionaries who did all the heavy lifting and thinking. His ideal role would be as the Pharaoh Rameses II (Yul Brynner in the movie “The Ten Commandments”). He would prefer to just make pronouncements of his wishes and say “So let it be written. So let it be done.” and then go back to his burgers, fried chicken and TV. Half-assed, as I said.
That sort of dictator doesn’t last long. Being already elderly and not in the best of shape physically is not a recipe for the long term. And being lulled (and gulled) by sycophantic protestations of undying loyalty from underlings has led to many coups d’etat. We avoided even the possibility of all that by 7 million popular and 74 Electoral votes."







Den Valdron - Quora

What does TRUMP! have to do with Quid Pro's doctrine?

Because Qud pro is Trump, silly! You know him as the blob, but he is really quid pro.

So, while others are talking about the current president, aka Quid Pro, you want to talk about the previous President, aka TRUMP!. Now, why would you want to do that, other than trying to deflect from and defend someone who apparently can't stand on his own merits?

The problem, as I see it, is that you are babbling away to beat the band and there was dead silence on your part where Trump was concerned. There is no "Biden Doctrine" other than to get our country organized to face our problems head-on.
When you highschool drop-outs use silly expressions to try and make a point or to wrongfully debase Trump's opposition, it requires a comparison to see whether you are being fair or just stupidly political with no real purpose.

Quid Pro is POTUS, in case you hadn't noticed. TRUMP! is not, also in case you didn't notice. That means we ARE interested in Quid Pro's doctrine and how he's going to govern while we don't care what TRUMP!'s doctrine was because he's no longer in office, in case you didn't notice. I have noticed something from the campaign that continues to this day. During the campaign I would ask repeatedly why people were voting for Quid Pro, and save for maybe one or two, no one could articulate a reason that didn't involve TRUMP!. Today, Quid Pro is in office and the phenomenon continues with criticism. Quid Pro's sycophants can't seem to defend or promote him without referencing TRUMP!. You'd think somebody with almost 50 years in office would generate more enthusiasm than that. Guess not.

No one needed to give you a reason, although there were plenty of them. Frankly,
the blob's past was a great reason in itself because you don't want a grifter in the White House, yes? Nobody had a good reason to vote for Trump, except for that "swamp" horseshit, especially when the "swamp" all ended up in the White House.
There is no quid pro-Joe, lamb chop, but there is a Ukraine quid pro-pro blob who lost the election.

Still trying to prove my point, I see because you still want to talk about TRUMP! instead of Quid Pro Joe. News flash, he's not in office any more and can't hurt you any more. Of course, you could show us on the doll where he hurt you but this thread is about Quid Pro Joe's doctrine, so you've wasted enough bandwidth trying to derail it as it is.

I know what you are trying to do, guy. You can't escape your actions of the past and
be "horrified" about the present because you are not believable.

Exactly what have I said that would make you think I'm "horrified"?