- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,098
- 140,478
- 2,300
The men at Lexington and Concord would take and feather your lying ass
Nowhere in the 27 Grievances against England in the Declaration of Independence does it mention access to firearms
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The men at Lexington and Concord would take and feather your lying ass
James Mason asked" who is the Militia the people are the militia.The 2nd gave the reason why the people had the right to keep and bear arms.
If that right was unfettered, the first clause would be unnecessary.
I need a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine to insure that have equal, or superior firepower.You don’t 'need' an AR 15 to defend yourself – there are other firearms much better suited for that purpose, such as handguns and shotguns.
And the notion of needing an AR 15 to ‘defend against’ the government is ignorant idiocy; neither the Second Amendment nor its case law support insurrectionist dogma.
But that’s not why AR 15s shouldn’t be banned.
You and others on the right need to stop with ignorant nonsense about ‘defending yourself’ and opposing ‘government tyranny’ in opposition to AWBs and magazine capacity restrictions.
The valid and compelling reason to oppose AWBs and magazine capacity restrictions is advocacy of limited government and opposition to government excess and overreach.
Moreover, bans on assault weapons and magazine capacity restrictions should be opposed because they simply don’t work, bans rarely do – whether it’s abortion, drugs, or guns, ‘bans’ are ineffective and useless.
to who?I need a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine to insure that have equal, or superior firepower.
Show us how many gun zones have been attacked vs gun free zones.Wrong again. The numbers have far more impermissible zones, than permissible zones, hence they accumulate more "mass murder" free occurrences.
Making them numerically safer.
We the People are that militia... IT is not an organization by the government. The government is however responsible for its training and access to everything needed to keep it well functioning. Our current leadership wants to deprive us of this making us ripe for subjugation, the very thing it was meant to keep us from.I don't think that's what it means.
A well regulated militia, being necessary for a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Ok, so, what is well regulated? The Militia. For what reason? The security of a free state. What is needed? The people to have free access to firearms.
So, to me, if access to firearms is what is needed to have a well regulated militia, then it's not about government rules, it's about being properly trained, armed, and prepared. That's what "well regulated" appears to mean in this context, no?
TO any other standing army or idiot who wants to subjugate us.to who?
Ok, let's take defense against government off the table. Let's just say it's for self defense only.You don’t 'need' an AR 15 to defend yourself – there are other firearms much better suited for that purpose, such as handguns and shotguns.
And the notion of needing an AR 15 to ‘defend against’ the government is ignorant idiocy; neither the Second Amendment nor its case law support insurrectionist dogma.
But that’s not why AR 15s shouldn’t be banned.
You and others on the right need to stop with ignorant nonsense about ‘defending yourself’ and opposing ‘government tyranny’ in opposition to AWBs and magazine capacity restrictions.
The valid and compelling reason to oppose AWBs and magazine capacity restrictions is advocacy of limited government and opposition to government excess and overreach.
Moreover, bans on assault weapons and magazine capacity restrictions should be opposed because they simply don’t work, bans rarely do – whether it’s abortion, drugs, or guns, ‘bans’ are ineffective and useless.
Why were British troops going to Lexington and Concord?Nowhere in the 27 Grievances against England in the Declaration of Independence does it mention access to firearms
No I'm not.You are confusing mercenaries with militia.
Actually no he's not.You are confusing mercenaries with militia.
And both are protected by metal detectors and armed guards. In 2014 there was a mass shooting INSIDE a terminal at LAX.When was the last time a mass shooting occurred at a major sports stadium or airport?
Those are gun free zones
Mercenaries get paid ( usually in advance)You are confusing mercenaries with militia.
Hence the right’s ‘militia’ canard, the failed, inane attempt to circumvent the Second Amendment, its case law, and necessary, proper, and Constitutional firearm regulatory measures where private citizens should have access to the same weapons as the Federal military.One has only to read the constitution to see what the framers intended
Article II, Section 2, Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of . . .
Wrong.The left is clueless into the real meaning of these words.
Correct – and controlled by their respective governments.Absolutely wrong. The militas were military units organized by the colonies (states).
We the people, would not be member of the militia, as they would instead be conscripted into the army or the navy,
Access to firearms has nothing to do with regulation; and there’s nothing in the history, text, or case law of the Second Amendment that authorizes the notion of armed citizens ‘self-regulating’ completely absent government control and oversight.I don't think that's what it means.
A well regulated militia, being necessary for a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Ok, so, what is well regulated? The Militia. For what reason? The security of a free state. What is needed? The people to have free access to firearms.
So, to me, if access to firearms is what is needed to have a well regulated militia, then it's not about government rules, it's about being properly trained, armed, and prepared. That's what "well regulated" appears to mean in this context, no?
No, you don’t.I need a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine to insure that have equal, or superior firepower.
This is a lie.Show us how many gun zones have been attacked vs gun free zones.
The Buffalo shooter picked his target because it was a gun free zone.