What I think of transgenderism

[frigidweirdo]

How does a medical examiner tell if a burned body was male or female? Bone structure. not something you can change. Also your DNA is either male or female. Science says you cannot be both.

Are you suggesting that the brain and the body are the same? That if the body says male, the brain must also say male?

 

[Ringo]

Are you suggesting that the brain and the body are the same? That if the body says male, the brain must also say male?

If the brain is normal, then yes

 

[frigidweirdo]

If the brain is normal, then yes

"Normal", define "normal".

 

[Ringo]

"Normal", define "normal".

And what next? Define "define"? You can play these lawyer tricks with someone else, I'm immunized to political correctness and liberal delirium

 

[frigidweirdo]

And what next? Define "define"? You can play these lawyer tricks with someone else, I'm immunized to political correctness and liberal delirium

So, you make a claim and you can't even explain it?

What a surprise.

So we're all supposed to think there are "normal" people with "normal" brains and then there's everyone else, those who don't fit YOUR patterns and we should ostracize them, treat them badly, make them third class citizens or enslave them, all based on an emotional "normal" which never gets explained because you don't even know what it is.

Right.... so, bigotry then?

 

[Ringo]

then there's everyone else, those who don't fit YOUR patterns and we should ostracize them, treat them badly, make them third class citizens or enslave them,

They want to be normal& So they should behave like normal and don't pretend that a man's union with a man is normal (although it's probably normal among perverts), don't stick your disgusting habits in our face at gay parades (which are disgusting in themselves). They have not been persecuted for their habits for a long time, but this is not enough for them. They need perversions to be recognized as the norm.
Medicine claims that there are three types of faggots: passive, active and topical. The first two species behave this way because that is their nature, and no one has any complaints about them. But the third kind is such faggots who became faggots because they read in the magazine "Loverboy" that this is relevant at the moment. And there will always be claims against them

 

[frigidweirdo]

They want to be normal& So they should behave like normal and don't pretend that a man's union with a man is normal (although it's probably normal among perverts), don't stick your disgusting habits in our face at gay parades (which are disgusting in themselves). They have not been persecuted for their habits for a long time, but this is not enough for them. They need perversions to be recognized as the norm.
Medicine claims that there are three types of faggots: passive, active and topical. The first two species behave this way because that is their nature, and no one has any complaints about them. But the third kind is such faggots who became faggots because they read in the magazine "Loverboy" that this is relevant at the moment. And there will always be claims against them

How does a person "behave like normal"? And who is the judge of that?

I'm not "normal", I never have been. I'm also not gay, but I know what it's like to not be normal. I know what it's like to live in a place where people look at you and talk about you when they see you, give you a name or two that sums up your status for them.

The US has a Bill of Rights. That Bill of Rights is supposed to mean that people who aren't "normal" in your eyes, or anyone else's eyes, gets treated THE SAME.

That you then insult people because they're not "normal", just shows what this is all about. It's about people who want to try and elevate themselves in society by putting others down, and not about logic, sense, decency or anything positive.

 

[martybegan]

So, you make a claim and you can't even explain it?

What a surprise.

So we're all supposed to think there are "normal" people with "normal" brains and then there's everyone else, those who don't fit YOUR patterns and we should ostracize them, treat them badly, make them third class citizens or enslave them, all based on an emotional "normal" which never gets explained because you don't even know what it is.

Right.... so, bigotry then?

Normal in the case of organisms that reproduce sexually is males feel like males and want to fuck females, and females feel like females and want to be fucked by males.

This of course is purely from a biological standpoint, and ignores any morality or social constructs.

 

[Ringo]

The US has a Bill of Rights. That Bill of Rights is supposed to mean that people who aren't "normal" in your eyes, or anyone else's eyes, gets treated THE SAME.

No, it is not. Bill of Rights about politics and not about sexual perversions. The same way as Second amendment not about hunting and sport.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Normal in the case of organisms that reproduce sexually is males feel like males and want to fuck females, and females feel like females and want to be fucked by males.

This of course is purely from a biological standpoint, and ignores any morality or social constructs.

And those that deviate very far from this get weeded out through natural selection.

 

[Circe]

You might want to read up on the current medical and psychological protocols on addressing the needs of transgender kids before to continue to demonstrate the fact that you don't know shit and are just jabbering out of your pie hole

I have read two books on this mental illness of trannies now, which I very much doubt you have done. Since you have shown above you are just one of these worthless leftwing verbal abusers who likes to talk dirty to women, I'm deleting you immediately.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I have read two books on this mental illness of trannies now, which I very much doubt you have done. Since you have shown above you are just one of these worthless leftwing verbal abusers who likes to talk dirty to women, I'm deleting you immediately.

What books? By who ? Marcus Bachman? Matt Staver?

 

[frigidweirdo]

No, it is not. Bill of Rights about politics and not about sexual perversions. The same way as Second amendment not about hunting and sport.

The Bill of Rights was written to protect certain things surrounding politics, but it was designed to keep certain power in the hands of individuals.

It was designed to keep the governments religious views out of people's lives. And "sexual perversion" or however you want to call it, is such a religious thing to be kept in the hands of individuals.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

No, it is not. Bill of Rights about politics and not about sexual perversions. The same way as Second amendment not about hunting and sport.

The Billof rights does not give you the right to decide what a "sexual perversion" is" and it damned sure does not give you, or anyone the right to determine a persons gender identity or to render it invalid

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The Billof [sic] rights does not give you the right to decide what a "sexual perversion" is" and it damned sure does not give you, or anyone the right to determine a persons gender identity or to render it invalid

Biology does that. hard science. Not the twisted mockery of “science” to which you degenerate freaks on the left wrong adhere, but the genuine science that you repudiate and mock.

 

[Iamartiewhitefox]

Normal in the case of organisms that reproduce sexually is males feel like males and want to fuck females, and females feel like females and want to be fucked by males.

This of course is purely from a biological standpoint, and ignores any morality or social constructs.

Above all thing's be kind with your words. Words indicate the Spirit that is in a person no matter what sex they say they are, be it the opposite to what they are. Our words will, or will not save us. All need to know that. God knows who is honest and who is not honest. Jesus is our example in all things. There is evil in the church, Gandalf The White. The evil being you said thou shalt not pass to, dwells in the catholic church. Missinformation comes from them. The Pope says civil unions for gays. That is not marrage. The church does not even have marrage right. Marrage needs two, not three.

 

[Iamartiewhitefox]

They want to be normal& So they should behave like normal and don't pretend that a man's union with a man is normal (although it's probably normal among perverts), don't stick your disgusting habits in our face at gay parades (which are disgusting in themselves). They have not been persecuted for their habits for a long time, but this is not enough for them. They need perversions to be recognized as the norm.
Medicine claims that there are three types of faggots: passive, active and topical. The first two species behave this way because that is their nature, and no one has any complaints about them. But the third kind is such faggots who became faggots because they read in the magazine "Loverboy" that this is relevant at the moment. And there will always be claims against them

The word perversion in whatever way it is used, does not refer to sex. The words refer to the mouth and tongue. Those parts that are not controlled will make the body ship to go in whatever direction, with no control to end up running aground. A perverted tongue will make whoever to be prevented in their ways. Wise people will see this. Unwise people will emulate them, adopting a lying perverted tongue, becoming like the people, that they behold, having no other example to follow.

 

[ESay]

They want to be normal& So they should behave like normal and don't pretend that a man's union with a man is normal (although it's probably normal among perverts), don't stick your disgusting habits in our face at gay parades (which are disgusting in themselves). They have not been persecuted for their habits for a long time, but this is not enough for them. They need perversions to be recognized as the norm.
Medicine claims that there are three types of faggots: passive, active and topical. The first two species behave this way because that is their nature, and no one has any complaints about them. But the third kind is such faggots who became faggots because they read in the magazine "Loverboy" that this is relevant at the moment. And there will always be claims against them

It seems you can't grasp is how ridiculous the word 'normal' sounds in this context. Who will decide what is normal and what is not? Vice police?

 

[Ringo]

It seems you can't grasp is how ridiculous the word 'normal' sounds in this context. Who will decide what is normal and what is not? Vice police?

Why perverts and creeps love to discuss definition of what the meaning of "is" is?

 

[ESay]

Why perverts and creeps love to discuss definition of what the meaning of "is" is?

I don't know in what of the two categories I would fall according to your 'normal' reality, but the root is not about definitions at all. It is all about how this 'normality' will be implemented on practice.