What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds

[g5000]

BREAKINGBOMBSHELL: RUBES STILL FALLING FOR HILLARY IMMINENT INDICTMENT STORIES FOR NINTH YEAR IN A ROW!!!

USMB - The champagne has gone flat, the cake is stale, but the tards are still wearing their party hats, waiting for the signal that will never come.

"I haven't gone to the bathroom in eighteen months", one creduloid who is literally full of shit stated. "I'm worried the indictment will come down while I'm taking a dump and I'll miss my chance to be the first to post about it."

As they talk in excited tones in their huddled groups, the eyes of the lonely chumps are constantly darting to their propaganda news sites, hoping against hope that today is finally the day.

"I heard an anonymous inside source has said an FBI agent said a judge has just signed a Tase on Sight (TOS) order for Hillary Clinton!", one dupe titters excitedly. "It's happening! It's finally happening!"

But, it isn't happening. It is never happening. And as the sun rises after another long lonely night's vigil and heartbreak, the saps wander blearily-eyed toward the nearest Dunkin Donuts with free wifi to recharge their pathetic souls with black coffee and day old crullers.

"It's being signed right now. I just know it, " one mutters to another as he checks his phone's signal strength.

 

[imawhosure]

It all is what it is, but what actually is it? Well, maybe we all can learn something, who knows, Leftists still can learn, I think!

 

[candycorn]

Why did Bryan Pagliano invoke the Fifth more than125 times after given immunity? What is he hiding?

Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition

Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.

www.foxnews.com

Oh...so all of the sudden invoking the fifth is a sign that someone is guilty?

Eric Trump Invoked Fifth Amendment About 500 Times, N.Y. AG Says

Eric Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 500 times when the Trump Organization executive vice president was deposed as part of a civil probe into the company’s asset valuations, New York’s top law enforcement officer told a judge.

www.bloomberg.com

So blob jr is guilty too right? LOCK HIM UP...LOCK HIM UP....LOCK HIM UP....

 

[Toro]

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds​

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film "Hillary," when the candidate told running mate Tim Kaine of “scratching hard” to expose Donald Trump's “weird connections” to Russia. Prosecutor John Durham is zeroing in on her 2016 campaign's role in promoting the collusion hoax.​

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film

www.realclearinvestigations.com

27 Jan 2022 ~~ By Paul Sperry

As indictments and new court filings indicate that Special Counsel John Durham is investigating Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for feeding false reports to the FBI to incriminate Donald Trump and his advisers as Kremlin agents, Clinton’s role in the burgeoning scandal remains elusive. What did she know and when did she know it?
Top officials involved in her campaign have repeatedly claimed, some under oath, that they and the candidate were unaware of the foundation of their disinformation campaign: the 35-page collection of now debunked claims of Trump/Russia collusion known as the Steele dossier. Even though her campaign helped pay for the dossier, they claim she only read it after BuzzFeed News published it in 2017.
But court documents, behind-the-scenes video footage and recently surfaced evidence reveal that Clinton and her top campaign advisers were much more involved in the more than $1 million operation to dredge up dirt on Trump and Russia than they have let on.
~Snip~
Former Bill Clinton political strategist Doug Schoen said it stretches credulity to suggest that top officials in the Clinton camp, including the candidate herself, weren’t fully aware of the research their campaign attorney was billing them for.
“With more than 380 payments from the Clinton campaign and the DNC being made to Perkins Coie, it is seemingly impossible that the candidate herself would not have direct knowledge of the purpose of those payments or any earmarks being made, especially those for Fusion GPS,” Schoen said.
~Snip~
Among those Americans aware of the Durham probe, fully 60% think the special counsel should question Clinton about her role in the dossier and other campaign foul play, according to a recent national poll by TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics. Broken down by political affiliation, 80% of Republicans, 44% of Democrats and 74% of independent voters agree that Clinton should be interviewed by investigators.
What happened more than five years ago may have renewed relevance: Some Democratic strategists speculate that Clinton is eyeing another run at the White House. As Vice President Kamala Harris’ popularity wanes and her shot at becoming the first female president slips, they say Clinton may see an opening.
“I will never be out of the game of politics,” Clinton told ABC's “Good Morning America” in October.

Commentary:
Thanks to Mr. Sperry for continuing the investigative reporting on Russia-Gate and the Dunham investigation.
Each day that goes by we see more and more that Russia-Gate is the most insidious political conspiracy in American history.
Imagine the outgoing party essentially used the state intelligence and law enforcement organizations to plant pieces of bogus evidence in an attempt to bring down the incoming president. It was a conspiracy, abuse of power and massive scandal. As some have said here Hillary Clinton however is too big to fail. If she didn't get kicked to the political curb for getting caught red handed cheating on a debate, she won't get touched by this either.
The question most raised is will people like Sussman, Elias, and Sullivan pay the piper for their illegal acts?
Indeed, this is all frustrating, too be sure. The optimistic part of me hopes that the timing of Durham's investigation is such that it will be concluded after the midterms, when there are people in power who might actually do something about it.
Although I'm doubtful if anyone of consequence will be convicted for their political and seditious wrongdoings, other than low hanging individuals. Unfortunately, the true political felons will as usual will walk away Scot Free.

Keep clinging!

And rage-clicking!

 

[whitehall]

Karl Marx Bernstein ran around for four years telling everyone who would listen that the allegations against Trump were "worse than Watergate" and now he is among the missing. Where are the "investigative reporters"? Would they get away with a confidential informant that they kept secret for forty years, today? Watergate was about a 3rd rate burglary and the attempted cover up. Bill Clinton did worse than that and what Hillary is alleged to have done verges on treason. Strangely enough nobody in the MSM seems interested in asking Hillary anything much less the tough questions.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Watergate was about a 3rd rate burglary and the attempted cover up. Bill Clinton did worse than that and what Hillary is alleged to have done verges on treason."

----------------------------------------------------
A bj under the desk is worse than a burglary?
A bj by willing consensual adults?

OK, you be you.
But, I would posit that most of the male lurkers on internet gossipboards would likely choose a consensual bj.....over coming home and finding their place robbed.
Anyway, that's my opinion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then this: "what Hillary is alleged to have done verges on treason."
How so?
And what did she do?

...............................................................

An then, this: " nobody in the MSM seems interested in asking Hillary anything much less the tough questions."

Well, I can't speak for vairous editors or their teams of reporters, but.....but it seems there really ain't a there there (except for what FOX drumming-it-up).

I do expect more of this story will be autopsied in the upcoming few days*. But, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say this story likely doesn't have legs. Meaning, it'll be gone soon. We'll see.


* Here's reportage on tonight's (2/16th) PBS News Hour:

New details on 2016 Russia probe prompt flawed allegations of espionage

 

[Clipper]

Your dumb ass has no idea who John Durham is. He will chew them up and spit them in your face when he is done. Closing in on Trump...that is funny, you tards have been saying that for 6 years now. Good luck fool.

"We'll get Hillary if it takes us 50 years"!

Keep trying, Ace. In 30 you may get there.

 

[2aguy]

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds​

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film "Hillary," when the candidate told running mate Tim Kaine of “scratching hard” to expose Donald Trump's “weird connections” to Russia. Prosecutor John Durham is zeroing in on her 2016 campaign's role in promoting the collusion hoax.​

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film

www.realclearinvestigations.com

27 Jan 2022 ~~ By Paul Sperry

As indictments and new court filings indicate that Special Counsel John Durham is investigating Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for feeding false reports to the FBI to incriminate Donald Trump and his advisers as Kremlin agents, Clinton’s role in the burgeoning scandal remains elusive. What did she know and when did she know it?
Top officials involved in her campaign have repeatedly claimed, some under oath, that they and the candidate were unaware of the foundation of their disinformation campaign: the 35-page collection of now debunked claims of Trump/Russia collusion known as the Steele dossier. Even though her campaign helped pay for the dossier, they claim she only read it after BuzzFeed News published it in 2017.
But court documents, behind-the-scenes video footage and recently surfaced evidence reveal that Clinton and her top campaign advisers were much more involved in the more than $1 million operation to dredge up dirt on Trump and Russia than they have let on.
~Snip~
Former Bill Clinton political strategist Doug Schoen said it stretches credulity to suggest that top officials in the Clinton camp, including the candidate herself, weren’t fully aware of the research their campaign attorney was billing them for.
“With more than 380 payments from the Clinton campaign and the DNC being made to Perkins Coie, it is seemingly impossible that the candidate herself would not have direct knowledge of the purpose of those payments or any earmarks being made, especially those for Fusion GPS,” Schoen said.
~Snip~
Among those Americans aware of the Durham probe, fully 60% think the special counsel should question Clinton about her role in the dossier and other campaign foul play, according to a recent national poll by TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics. Broken down by political affiliation, 80% of Republicans, 44% of Democrats and 74% of independent voters agree that Clinton should be interviewed by investigators.
What happened more than five years ago may have renewed relevance: Some Democratic strategists speculate that Clinton is eyeing another run at the White House. As Vice President Kamala Harris’ popularity wanes and her shot at becoming the first female president slips, they say Clinton may see an opening.
“I will never be out of the game of politics,” Clinton told ABC's “Good Morning America” in October.

Commentary:
Thanks to Mr. Sperry for continuing the investigative reporting on Russia-Gate and the Dunham investigation.
Each day that goes by we see more and more that Russia-Gate is the most insidious political conspiracy in American history.
Imagine the outgoing party essentially used the state intelligence and law enforcement organizations to plant pieces of bogus evidence in an attempt to bring down the incoming president. It was a conspiracy, abuse of power and massive scandal. As some have said here Hillary Clinton however is too big to fail. If she didn't get kicked to the political curb for getting caught red handed cheating on a debate, she won't get touched by this either.
The question most raised is will people like Sussman, Elias, and Sullivan pay the piper for their illegal acts?
Indeed, this is all frustrating, too be sure. The optimistic part of me hopes that the timing of Durham's investigation is such that it will be concluded after the midterms, when there are people in power who might actually do something about it.
Although I'm doubtful if anyone of consequence will be convicted for their political and seditious wrongdoings, other than low hanging individuals. Unfortunately, the true political felons will as usual will walk away Scot Free.

.....oooooh......ooooh....pick me.........pick me!!!


She knew everything, from the beginning........that's exactly how she rolls.....

 

[Doc7505]

.....oooooh......ooooh....pick me.........pick me!!!


She knew everything, from the beginning........that's exactly how she rolls.....

She agreed to and released DNC funds to finance these seditious actions. The person that would be key is Gary Gensler. He was Hillary's bag man.

 

[Chillicothe]

She agreed to and released DNC funds to finance these seditious actions. The person that would be key is Gary Gensler. He was Hillary's bag man.

She knew everything, from the beginning.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here, guys, watch this. It is informing.

New details on 2016 Russia probe prompt flawed allegations of espionage

A filing last week from the special counsel investigating the origins of the Russia probe has ignited a misleading media firestorm on the right that Hillary Clinton's campaign was guilty of illegally spying on Donald Trump. In a column this week, Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Charlie Savage...

www.pbs.org

 

[Abatis]

Karl Marx Bernstein ran around for four years telling everyone who would listen that the allegations against Trump were "worse than Watergate" and now he is among the missing.

Where the hell are Brennan and Clapper? There was a time when you couldn't pass the DEMnarrative channels without seeing them . . .

 

[Lakhota]

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds​

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film "Hillary," when the candidate told running mate Tim Kaine of “scratching hard” to expose Donald Trump's “weird connections” to Russia. Prosecutor John Durham is zeroing in on her 2016 campaign's role in promoting the collusion hoax.​

What Did Clinton Know and When Did She Know It? The Russiagate Evidence Builds

Above, a largely overlooked moment in the campaign film

www.realclearinvestigations.com

27 Jan 2022 ~~ By Paul Sperry

As indictments and new court filings indicate that Special Counsel John Durham is investigating Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for feeding false reports to the FBI to incriminate Donald Trump and his advisers as Kremlin agents, Clinton’s role in the burgeoning scandal remains elusive. What did she know and when did she know it?
Top officials involved in her campaign have repeatedly claimed, some under oath, that they and the candidate were unaware of the foundation of their disinformation campaign: the 35-page collection of now debunked claims of Trump/Russia collusion known as the Steele dossier. Even though her campaign helped pay for the dossier, they claim she only read it after BuzzFeed News published it in 2017.
But court documents, behind-the-scenes video footage and recently surfaced evidence reveal that Clinton and her top campaign advisers were much more involved in the more than $1 million operation to dredge up dirt on Trump and Russia than they have let on.
~Snip~
Former Bill Clinton political strategist Doug Schoen said it stretches credulity to suggest that top officials in the Clinton camp, including the candidate herself, weren’t fully aware of the research their campaign attorney was billing them for.
“With more than 380 payments from the Clinton campaign and the DNC being made to Perkins Coie, it is seemingly impossible that the candidate herself would not have direct knowledge of the purpose of those payments or any earmarks being made, especially those for Fusion GPS,” Schoen said.
~Snip~
Among those Americans aware of the Durham probe, fully 60% think the special counsel should question Clinton about her role in the dossier and other campaign foul play, according to a recent national poll by TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics. Broken down by political affiliation, 80% of Republicans, 44% of Democrats and 74% of independent voters agree that Clinton should be interviewed by investigators.
What happened more than five years ago may have renewed relevance: Some Democratic strategists speculate that Clinton is eyeing another run at the White House. As Vice President Kamala Harris’ popularity wanes and her shot at becoming the first female president slips, they say Clinton may see an opening.
“I will never be out of the game of politics,” Clinton told ABC's “Good Morning America” in October.

Commentary:
Thanks to Mr. Sperry for continuing the investigative reporting on Russia-Gate and the Dunham investigation.
Each day that goes by we see more and more that Russia-Gate is the most insidious political conspiracy in American history.
Imagine the outgoing party essentially used the state intelligence and law enforcement organizations to plant pieces of bogus evidence in an attempt to bring down the incoming president. It was a conspiracy, abuse of power and massive scandal. As some have said here Hillary Clinton however is too big to fail. If she didn't get kicked to the political curb for getting caught red handed cheating on a debate, she won't get touched by this either.
The question most raised is will people like Sussman, Elias, and Sullivan pay the piper for their illegal acts?
Indeed, this is all frustrating, too be sure. The optimistic part of me hopes that the timing of Durham's investigation is such that it will be concluded after the midterms, when there are people in power who might actually do something about it.
Although I'm doubtful if anyone of consequence will be convicted for their political and seditious wrongdoings, other than low hanging individuals. Unfortunately, the true political felons will as usual will walk away Scot Free.

Aren't you embarrassed? This fake news has been thoroughly debunked - even by Durham.