What Could Be More Appropriate????

[PoliticalChic]

The left needs to be exterminated

If you don't agree, you basically are on the side of evil

Quite the choice you give me.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Until tomorrow, when it happen all over again.

Well.....what can one expect when the Democrat Party authorized, supported, and absolved over 12 thousand riots, arsons, and anarcho-terrorist acts in the year run-up to the stolen election?

Their troops learned well.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is a perfect example why the TX abortion law is full of fail.

Do you wish to murder all the unborn, or just some???

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Quite the choice you give me.....

What other choice is there??

If one isn't willing to exterminate evil -- that will lead me to believe they are just online saying hyperbolic shit just for fun....

 

[PoliticalChic]

What other choice is there??

If one isn't willing to exterminate evil -- that will lead me to believe they are just online saying hyperbolic shit just for fun....

I don't use that sort of language.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I don't use that sort of language.

The Democrats are evil...are they not??

and what do you to evil.....you destroy it...

Unless of course....you just like to engage in hyperbolic babble to make you feel better about being powerless

 

[1srelluc]

Do you wish to murder all the unborn, or just some???

I just want women, in particular those of the blue population centers, to be allowed a choice.

 

[JGalt]

Do you wish to murder all the unborn, or just some???

I know of him from another board, he's one of the "good guys." He was being sarcastic.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrats are evil...are they not??

and what do you to evil.....you destroy it...

Unless of course....you just like to engage in hyperbolic babble to make you feel better about being powerless

Much better.

I rarely read posts with vulgar language.


I certainly see your point and can agree with your anger, but must admit that murder outside of self-defense is difficult for me to sign on to.

As for my power, I put my efforts into threads that reveal the truth to government school grads who haven't heard it before. And I hope that is efficacious.
I hope we can exterminate the evil.....perhaps not the perpetrators.....via truth.


And I hope it doesn't actually come down to your proposal:
I just do not want to think in terms of 'civil war.'
The last one took the lives of over 2% of our nation.
That would approach 8 million with today's population, and today's weapons are far more powerful.
And....it may not even be the solution to the problem.
I'm thinking that civilizations may simply have a 'sell-by' date....and we've reached ours.
It was great while it lasted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I just want women, in particular those of the blue population centers, to be allowed a choice.

That's because you lack the most elementary of biological education.

The unborn is not a part of her body.

Jot this down:
There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I know of him from another board, he's one of the "good guys." He was being sarcastic.

I'm gonna answer in the way his post comes across.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Much better.

I rarely read posts with vulgar language.


I certainly see your point and can agree with your anger, but must admit that murder outside of self-defense is difficult for me to sign on to.

As for my power, I put my efforts into threads that reveal the truth to government school grads who haven't heard it before. And I hope that is efficacious.
I hope we can exterminate the evil.....perhaps not the perpetrators.....via truth.


And I hope it doesn't actually come down to your proposal:
I just do not want to think in terms of 'civil war.'
The last one took the lives of over 2% of our nation.
That would approach 8 million with today's population, and today's weapons are far more powerful.
And....it may not even be the solution to the problem.
I'm thinking that civilizations may simply have a 'sell-by' date....and we've reached ours.
It was great while it lasted.

If Democrats are murdering everyone with either abortion, vaccines, etc -- why isn't it justified to just exterminate them??

It seems your solution is to just post random posts on messageboards and nothing more than that.....

Would a few newspaper posts about how the Nazis are exterminating Jews been enough to stop the holocaust??

It took an all-out actual physical war to stop it.....why are you so afraid to wage actual physical war against anyone who pushes for vaccines, abortion rights, etc??

 

[PoliticalChic]

If Democrats are murdering everyone with either abortion, vaccines, etc -- why isn't it justified to just exterminate them??

It seems your solution is to just post random posts on messageboards and nothing more than that.....

Would a few newspaper posts about how the Nazis are exterminating Jews been enough to stop the holocaust??

It took an all-out actual physical war to stop it.....why are you so afraid to wage actual physical war against anyone who pushes for vaccines, abortion rights, etc??

I didn't say it wasn't appropriate.....I said it doesn't fit with my worldview.

There is nothing random about my threads.....there are all aimed at education, my mission.

Check the stats, and you will find that 5 to 10 times more read a thread than post in one. Those readers are my target audience, I hope to provide the truth that the media, the Democrats, and the schools hid from them.

Now....I claim that I have convinced some to reject the Evil Party......but I can't state any particular number.
How many have you 'exterminated'???


Which of us is more successful?

 

[1srelluc]

That's because you lack the most elementary of biological education.

The unborn is not a part of her body.

Jot this down:
There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

1. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:

As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

Part of the Mother’s Body?

The slogan,

www.abort73.com

Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?

 

[BertramN]

1. Just for the heck of it......who do you suppose the perp voted for?


2. " Drive-By Shooters Attack Pro-Life Celebration in Texas

A gunman opened fire Sunday night on a crowd that had gathered at a Celebration of Life ceremony in Baytown, Texas.

A motorist drove by the location and opened fire striking a number of people. The injured were rushed to area hospitals. At least one person was killed. A child is also believed to have been injured

The Harris County Sheriff’s Office told television station KTRK that one person had been killed, and three others critically injured.

BREAKING: 15 Shot, 1 Killed in Texas Shooting - Todd Starnes

IMPORTANT NOTE FROM TODD: DON’T BE CENSORED ON SOCIAL MEDIA! CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR TODD’S EXCLUSIVE CONSERVATIVE NEWSLETTER […]

www.toddstarnes.com

Seems eminently simple from killing unborn innocents to killing born innocents.


Could the shooter be a Biden voter, supporter of the Evil Party???


Could be.

Does the name James Alex Fields Jr. ring any bells among you trump Nazis?

Here's a hint: Charlottesville.



.

 

[JGalt]

Does the name James Alex Fields Jr. ring any bells among you trump Nazis?

Here's a hint: Charlottesville.



.

Doesn't ring a bell to me. I cancel-cultured that Charlottesville thing out, so it never happened.

 

[1srelluc]

Does the name James Alex Fields Jr. ring any bells among you trump Nazis?

Here's a hint: Charlottesville.



.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does the name James Alex Fields Jr. ring any bells among you trump Nazis?

SHere's a hint: Charlottesville.



.

1. What does either Charlottesville or 'Nazis' have to do with Trump???


2. Speaking of the German socialists, and comparing them to the ersatz socialists...

Now....go press your brown shirt......

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Retribution will happen for the Texas Heartbeat Law. California's reptilian governor has already proposed a law to avenge Texas abortionists by destroying Californians' Second Amendment. Honestly, and for all we "little people" know, a war could be raging out there between ideologically divided armies. The mainstream press would never let us know. I for one am tired and bored of the simmering hatred between our nation's major political factions. If there is to be all our war between them, can't we just get it on and get it over with? Please?

But there isn’t a war. There is a perpetual assault by democrats upon Americans.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

.....but it was mostly peaceful, Chic.


Let's not forget that.

The shooting was mostly peaceful. The celebration was insurrection.