What a shame: AOC could lose her house seat after 2020 through elimination of her district

In what way is she a laughingstock? What has she done to earn this? Be specific.
For the two most glaring examples of her idiocy that spring to mind is her Green New Deal (ridiculous on it's face) and her claim that the world would end in twelve years (probably eleven by now) if global warming wasn't immediately reversed.

A laughingstock, an embarrassment, a source of mockery, a cornucopia of ridicule, the punchline to so many jokes....she is all that and a bag of horse feed.
 
In what way is she a laughingstock? What has she done to earn this? Be specific.
For the two most glaring examples of her idiocy that spring to mind is her Green New Deal (ridiculous on it's face) and her claim that the world would end in twelve years (probably eleven by now) if global warming wasn't immediately reversed.

A laughingstock, an embarrassment, a source of mockery, a cornucopia of ridicule, the punchline to so many jokes....she is all that and a bag of horse feed.
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
 
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
And yet even more ridiculous is you trying to put words into the mouths of republicans.
There is a problem but it is nowhere near the existential, end of the world crisis leftist liars try to stoke the public's fear with.

You can't help yourself though. I get it.
 
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
And yet even more ridiculous is you trying to put words into the mouths of republicans.
There is a problem but it is nowhere near the existential, end of the world crisis leftist liars try to stoke the public's fear with.

You can't help yourself though. I get it.
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth
 
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
And yet even more ridiculous is you trying to put words into the mouths of republicans.
There is a problem but it is nowhere near the existential, end of the world crisis leftist liars try to stoke the public's fear with.

You can't help yourself though. I get it.
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth


That's bullshit, of course.

President Obama signed and implemented the Paris Accords and the Republicans didn't block him at all.

We were actually in the Paris Accords for years, and the weather didn't change at all
 
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth
That depends on what democrat authored legislation calls for (usually a massive transfer of wealth and crushing taxes on the middle class).
Can you even state a current position statement made by republicans on climate change? Doubtful.
 
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
And yet even more ridiculous is you trying to put words into the mouths of republicans.
There is a problem but it is nowhere near the existential, end of the world crisis leftist liars try to stoke the public's fear with.

You can't help yourself though. I get it.
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth


That's bullshit, of course.

President Obama signed and implemented the Paris Accords and the Republicans didn't block him at all.

We were actually in the Paris Accords for years, and the weather didn't change at all
Republicans withdrew from the Paris Accords
An embarrassment to our nation
 
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth
That depends on what democrat authored legislation calls for (usually a massive transfer of wealth and crushing taxes on the middle class).
Can you even state a current position statement made by republicans on climate change? Doubtful.

Protecting the environment is not a transfer of wealth
 
Protecting the environment is not a transfer of wealth
A transfer of wealth is a transfer of wealth, in the name of protecting the environment, Poindexter

How is draining wealth from the US and sending it to the UN to redistribute it to Mali or
Bangladesh (after their own cut, of course) going to reduce the temperature of earth even a fraction of a single degree?

Wake up, numb nuts!
 
More ridiculous is Republican denial that there is a problem at all
And yet even more ridiculous is you trying to put words into the mouths of republicans.
There is a problem but it is nowhere near the existential, end of the world crisis leftist liars try to stoke the public's fear with.

You can't help yourself though. I get it.
No
Republicans have been blocking climate change legislation for decades
Their leader has declared climate change to be a myth


That's bullshit, of course.

President Obama signed and implemented the Paris Accords and the Republicans didn't block him at all.

We were actually in the Paris Accords for years, and the weather didn't change at all
Republicans withdrew from the Paris Accords
An embarrassment to our nation


Actually, we didn't withdraw from the Paris Accords not until 11/4/2020. So even though they are still in effect, it doesn't seem to be affecting the climate at al
 
Actually, we didn't withdraw from the Paris Accords not until 11/4/2020. So even though they are still in effect, it doesn't seem to be affecting the climate at al
It's more likely to reduce the money in US pockets than the temperature of the climate. These feel good schemes to redistribute wealth in the name of the climate are pure bunk!
 
In what way is she a laughingstock? What has she done to earn this? Be specific.
For the two most glaring examples of her idiocy that spring to mind is her Green New Deal (ridiculous on it's face)

That’s what Republicans said about Roosevelt’s New Deal. They were wrong then, too.

and her claim that the world would end in twelve years (probably eleven by now) if global warming wasn't immediately reversed.

That wasn’t what she said. Obviously you can’t criticize her or her policies without lying.

A laughingstock, an embarrassment, a source of mockery, a cornucopia of ridicule, the punchline to so many jokes....she is all that and a bag of horse feed.

Irony is dead. You support Trump, who embodies all of that.
 
In what way is she a laughingstock? What has she done to earn this? Be specific.
For the two most glaring examples of her idiocy that spring to mind is her Green New Deal (ridiculous on it's face)

That’s what Republicans said about Roosevelt’s New Deal. They were wrong then, too.

and her claim that the world would end in twelve years (probably eleven by now) if global warming wasn't immediately reversed.

That wasn’t what she said. Obviously you can’t criticize her or her policies without lying.

A laughingstock, an embarrassment, a source of mockery, a cornucopia of ridicule, the punchline to so many jokes....she is all that and a bag of horse feed.

Irony is dead. You support Trump, who embodies all of that.
You think the green new deal isnt a total piece of shit.

tenor.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top