We have no need for more nuclear waste and hazards. Co2 does nothing. Hopefully Pam Bondi will prosecute Co2 Fraud immediately.

[EMH]

The nuclear industry is using Co2 FRAUD to push for a comeback. It is a comeback we do not need. Nuclear is hazardous and the waste problem is costly, dangerous, and always results in a "not in my backyard" court fight.

It is time to start undoing the harm caused by traitors W, homO, and Biden. Co2 does absolutely nothing. Earth is not warming. There is no ongoing net ice melt. Hence, there is no need for more nuclear.

The Co2 Fraud for Dummies....

OK, so maybe not everyone is proficient at basic science.... OK. But most of you can understand some things. The Co2 FRAUD aka "Global Warming" aka "the gas Co2 is the cause of Earth climate change" has never had any real evidence to support it. By "real" we mean FROM THE INSTRUMENTS THAT...

www.usmessageboard.com

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Pluto and Surface Air Pressure

https://science.nasa.gov/dwarf-planets/pluto/facts/ Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away – similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Darkwind]

 

[initforme]

Nuclear is far more efficient....it's going to be the future.

 

[EMH]

Nuclear is far more efficient....it's going to be the future.

only if you do not account for the waste disposal.

With all the "terrorists" and Chinese military age men walking around, only a really sick person would want more nuke now.

 

[KissMy]

Nuclear is far more efficient....it's going to be the future.

If it were more efficient, it wouldn't be the most expensive energy source as it has been for over 70 years.

And if you believe Thorium will save the day.... "The reasons were that uranium-fuelled reactors were more efficient, the research into uranium was proven and thorium's breeding ratio was thought insufficient to produce enough fuel to support development of a commercial nuclear industry."

 

[Darkwind]

If it were more efficient, it wouldn't be the most expensive energy source as it has been for over 70 years.

And if you believe Thorium will save the day.... "The reasons were that uranium-fuelled reactors were more efficient, the research into uranium was proven and thorium's breeding ratio was thought insufficient to produce enough fuel to support development of a commercial nuclear industry."

only if you do not account for the waste disposal.

With all the "terrorists" and Chinese military age men walking around, only a really sick person would want more nuke now.

educate yourself.

 

[Shareprofit]

The nuclear industry is using Co2 FRAUD to push for a comeback. It is a comeback we do not need. Nuclear is hazardous and the waste problem is costly, dangerous, and always results in a "not in my backyard" court fight.

It is time to start undoing the harm caused by traitors W, homO, and Biden. Co2 does absolutely nothing. Earth is not warming. There is no ongoing net ice melt. Hence, there is no need for more nuclear.

The Co2 Fraud for Dummies....

OK, so maybe not everyone is proficient at basic science.... OK. But most of you can understand some things. The Co2 FRAUD aka "Global Warming" aka "the gas Co2 is the cause of Earth climate change" has never had any real evidence to support it. By "real" we mean FROM THE INSTRUMENTS THAT...

www.usmessageboard.com

Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice. What are the parameters of climate that can change? Ocean levels Atmospheric...

www.usmessageboard.com

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Pluto and Surface Air Pressure

https://science.nasa.gov/dwarf-planets/pluto/facts/ Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away – similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have...

www.usmessageboard.com

It's "CO2" and it does contribute to Global warming, now run along junior.

 

[EMH]

educate yourself.

LOL!!!

Propaganda from those arguing Co2 is causing warming...

without any actual DATA to support the claim.

 

[EMH]

It's "CO2" and it does contribute to Global warming, now run along junior.

Not according to the ACTUAL DATA... just FUDGE.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling


Translation from NBC spin = the two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temperature, satellites and balloons, both showed NO WARMING for more than three decades of rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion before being FUDGED in 2005 with laughable bullshit excuses that do not explain what the FUDGE did to the data...


is homO your hero?

Why did homO go silent for two years??

https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+climate+silence+2010+2012&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS1003US1003&oq=o&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2j69i57j69i59j46i131i199i433i465i512j0i433i512j46i131i199i433i465i512i650j46i199i465i512j0i433i512j0i271.3006j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

[KissMy]

educate yourself.

 

[elektra]

only if you do not account for the waste disposal.

With all the "terrorists" and Chinese military age men walking around, only a really sick person would want more nuke now.

Where is all the waste now.
How much waste is there
Does nuclear create more waste than solar and wind power
How can you build solar and wind without nuclear power

Answers we will not get from the OP

 

[elektra]

With all the "terrorists" and Chinese military age men walking around, only a really sick person would want more nuke now.

Why is this a problem

 

[Shareprofit]

Not according to the ACTUAL DATA... just FUDGE.

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling


Translation from NBC spin = the two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temperature, satellites and balloons, both showed NO WARMING for more than three decades of rising Co2 in highly correlated fashion before being FUDGED in 2005 with laughable bullshit excuses that do not explain what the FUDGE did to the data...


is homO your hero?

Why did homO go silent for two years??

https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+climate+silence+2010+2012&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS1003US1003&oq=o&aqs=chrome.0.69i59l2j69i57j69i59j46i131i199i433i465i512j0i433i512j46i131i199i433i465i512i650j46i199i465i512j0i433i512j0i271.3006j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

You sound demented.

 

[Delldude]

It's "CO2" and it does contribute to Global warming, now run along junior.

Cow farts.......

 

[Shareprofit]

Cow farts.......

What about them?

 

[Delldude]

What about them?

Bill Gates has cow fart issues.

 

[San Souci]

It's "CO2" and it does contribute to Global warming, now run along junior.

Trees breath CO2.

 

[Delldude]

Trees breath CO2.

Look at all the tree fertilizer we give them.

Exhale Oxygen.... fossil fuels been good for the environment......

 

[EMH]

Where is all the waste now.
How much waste is there
Does nuclear create more waste than solar and wind power
How can you build solar and wind without nuclear power

Answers we will not get from the OP

Co2 does nothing.

Solar and wind should not be subsidized, nor should nuclear.

We should use hydrocarbons and make America competitive again...

Long-term nuclear waste warning messages - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The steep costs of nuclear waste in the U.S.

sustainability.stanford.edu

The first is spent fuel from nuclear reactors used to generate electricity. Those reactors have left us with about 80,000 metric tonnes of used spent fuel, and we don’t have a way forward for the disposal of this waste. It’s stored at more than 75 sites in 35 states around the country, so many of us have some in our state, including California.
The second category is the waste generated by our nuclear weapons complex. That defense waste has accumulated since the earliest days of the Manhattan Project. The highly-radioactive waste from chemical processing is mainly stored in very large metal tanks. They are located at the Savannah River site in South Carolina, the Hanford site in Washington State, at Idaho National Laboratory in Idaho, and Nuclear Fuel Services site at West Valley in New York State.
“
I think it’s discouraging that we continue to release radioactivity to the environment because after more than 40 years we still have not developed a successful plan for going forward. ”


The two categories of waste are separated in the budget. At the moment, the budget for the Department of Energy is about $30 billion. Of that budget, about $12 billion is for the nuclear weapons programs. That leaves us $18 billion to use for all things related to energy — nuclear power, fossil fuel, wind, and solar. About $6 billion, one third, is used to deal with the legacy high-level waste from the Manhattan Project. We as taxpayers pay $6 billion every year to address that problem, a huge cost that we will incur for many decades into the future. The projected total cost of clean-up after the Manhattan Project is well over $300 billion. That’s more than the original cost of the weapons programs and the actual total will be even higher. That’s just the defense waste.

 

[Moonglow]

Co2 does nothing.

Solar and wind should not be subsidized, nor should nuclear.

We should use hydrocarbons and make America competitive again...

Long-term nuclear waste warning messages - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The steep costs of nuclear waste in the U.S.

sustainability.stanford.edu

The first is spent fuel from nuclear reactors used to generate electricity. Those reactors have left us with about 80,000 metric tonnes of used spent fuel, and we don’t have a way forward for the disposal of this waste. It’s stored at more than 75 sites in 35 states around the country, so many of us have some in our state, including California.
The second category is the waste generated by our nuclear weapons complex. That defense waste has accumulated since the earliest days of the Manhattan Project. The highly-radioactive waste from chemical processing is mainly stored in very large metal tanks. They are located at the Savannah River site in South Carolina, the Hanford site in Washington State, at Idaho National Laboratory in Idaho, and Nuclear Fuel Services site at West Valley in New York State.
“
I think it’s discouraging that we continue to release radioactivity to the environment because after more than 40 years we still have not developed a successful plan for going forward. ”



The two categories of waste are separated in the budget. At the moment, the budget for the Department of Energy is about $30 billion. Of that budget, about $12 billion is for the nuclear weapons programs. That leaves us $18 billion to use for all things related to energy — nuclear power, fossil fuel, wind, and solar. About $6 billion, one third, is used to deal with the legacy high-level waste from the Manhattan Project. We as taxpayers pay $6 billion every year to address that problem, a huge cost that we will incur for many decades into the future. The projected total cost of clean-up after the Manhattan Project is well over $300 billion. That’s more than the original cost of the weapons programs and the actual total will be even higher. That’s just the defense waste.

Yes, let us put all our eggs in one basket, derpa.