Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama

[Uncensored2008]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

The washingpost fact checker is changing how he operates based on his assumptions that hte biden administration will be like.


Those are HIS words on the issue.

And no. I think that hte media as a whole, will give Biden a pass on almost everything.

Yea I wouldn’t assume biden is Lying Everytime he opens his mouth just like we didn’t bush Reagan, Obama. They weren’t liars. Sorry but we don’t need a fact checker like we did with trump.

You guys are idiots. When the media was deregulated in the 90s 5 companies, conservative companies, came in and snatched up all the news. They now sensor the media. They only appear to be liberal.

Trustvme, your side will be fact checking bidens every word. Sorry the Washington post isn’t going to do it for you. Biden’s too honest.

DIfferent rules for your side, got it. Thanks for not denying it.

So, you remember when Defund was the cool meme going around? What ever happened to that?

I told people at that time, that it would never happen.

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

The washingpost fact checker is changing how he operates based on his assumptions that hte biden administration will be like.


Those are HIS words on the issue.

And no. I think that hte media as a whole, will give Biden a pass on almost everything.

Yea I wouldn’t assume biden is Lying Everytime he opens his mouth just like we didn’t bush Reagan, Obama. They weren’t liars. Sorry but we don’t need a fact checker like we did with trump.

You guys are idiots. When the media was deregulated in the 90s 5 companies, conservative companies, came in and snatched up all the news. They now sensor the media. They only appear to be liberal.

Trustvme, your side will be fact checking bidens every word. Sorry the Washington post isn’t going to do it for you. Biden’s too honest.

DIfferent rules for your side, got it. Thanks for not denying it.

So, you remember when Defund was the cool meme going around? What ever happened to that?

I told people at that time, that it would never happen.

Of course that would never happen.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

The washingpost fact checker is changing how he operates based on his assumptions that hte biden administration will be like.


Those are HIS words on the issue.

And no. I think that hte media as a whole, will give Biden a pass on almost everything.

Yea I wouldn’t assume biden is Lying Everytime he opens his mouth just like we didn’t bush Reagan, Obama. They weren’t liars. Sorry but we don’t need a fact checker like we did with trump.

You guys are idiots. When the media was deregulated in the 90s 5 companies, conservative companies, came in and snatched up all the news. They now sensor the media. They only appear to be liberal.

Trustvme, your side will be fact checking bidens every word. Sorry the Washington post isn’t going to do it for you. Biden’s too honest.

DIfferent rules for your side, got it. Thanks for not denying it.

So, you remember when Defund was the cool meme going around? What ever happened to that?

I told people at that time, that it would never happen.

Of course that would never happen.

Did Biden tell the people on his side of the aisle to stop the stupid talk and get real?

Or did he let the hot heads run wild and played both sides of the issue, to get votes from the riled up base, while not losing votes from the terrified blue dog democrats?


The Washington Post guy, the way he operated against Trump, would have counted several "lies" among that shit storm.


But under the Dem Rules, he gets a pass.

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

Hilarious coming from someone claiming Obama and Biden don’t lie.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

Yeah, that’s why you defend Joe doesn’t need to be fact checked.
Just follow him like the sheeple you are!

‘Joe Biden is a pathological liar’

This coming Tuesday, as you head off to the polls to cast your vote, remember this: Joe Biden is a pathological liar.

m.washingtontimes.com

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

You are playing stupid. It is not a good look on you.

Trump was a vulgar braggart. Much of what he said, was not to be taken literally. And people knew that, so no harm done.


But that bit where your side, managed to convince the world that the President of the United States was a ws. or at least liked them.


People died because of that. And more will in the future.

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

Hilarious coming from someone claiming Obama and Biden don’t lie.

You can probably count the lies on one hand. Trump lied like pathologically. You don’t care though he did what you liked. Fucked with blacks, gays, China mexicans and muslims, gave tax breaks, built up the military, and appointed conservative justices who still won’t ban murder, I mean abortion

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

Hilarious coming from someone claiming Obama and Biden don’t lie.

You can probably count the lies on one hand. Trump lied like pathologically. You don’t care though he did what you liked. Fucked with blacks, gays, China mexicans and muslims, gave tax breaks, built up the military, and appointed conservative justices who still won’t ban murder, I mean abortion

Plagiarism, Lies, and toss in his constant racism and pedophillia.

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

Hilarious coming from someone claiming Obama and Biden don’t lie.

You can probably count the lies on one hand. Trump lied like pathologically. You don’t care though he did what you liked. Fucked with blacks, gays, China mexicans and muslims, gave tax breaks, built up the military, and appointed conservative justices who still won’t ban murder, I mean abortion

Hey, remember when JOe talked about how he was going to do so much about covid?

I don't either, didn't really pay much attention to his shit.

BUt,

Biden Ran On Campaign Promise To Tackle Raging COVID-19 - Now says, "NO HOPE OF DOING SO"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/21/president-joe-biden-faces-pressure-deliver-covid-19-promises/6656526002/ Liars lie, and bullshitters bullshit...and suckers and snowflakes always buy it. Biden hired what HE called an inexperienced and incompetent team, to include a...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

Right, Herr Himmler.

-----------------



Biden said in the September 12, 2019 debate: "We didn't lock people up in cages. We didn't separate families. We didn't do all of those things, number one. They did"

• Not true, all those pictures you saw of the cages were taken in 2014 during his time in office.

Joe Biden has repeatedly said he was arrested with Nelson Mandela on the streets of Soweto during a trip to South Africa in the 1970s, when South Africa was under apartheid.

• There is absolutely no truth to this, as Biden was later forced to confess

Biden said on May 22, 2020 in an interview on The Breakfast Club radio show: “The NAACP has endorsed me every time I've run.”

• Not true. The NAACP has never endorsed any candidate

On September 3, 2019 in an NPR interview, referring to the Iraq War, "immediately, the moment it started, I came out against the war at that moment."

• Not true. Biden fully supported the Iraq war and voted for the resolution to go to war

On August 7, 2019 – Joe Biden claimed that Donald Trump "asserted that immigrants would quote, ‘carve you up with a knife’."

• He never said that about immigrants. He said that MS-13 Gang members were doing that

The Long List Of the Many Times Joe Biden's Been Caught In Major Lies | 710 WOR | Mark Simone

Get the Latest Info!

710wor.iheart.com

Xi's man lies 20 times for every lie by the last legitimate president.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

Hilarious coming from someone claiming Obama and Biden don’t lie.

You can probably count the lies on one hand. Trump lied like pathologically. You don’t care though he did what you liked. Fucked with blacks, gays, China mexicans and muslims, gave tax breaks, built up the military, and appointed conservative justices who still won’t ban murder, I mean abortion

Hey, remember when JOe talked about how he was going to do so much about covid?

I don't either, didn't really pay much attention to his shit.

BUt,

Biden Ran On Campaign Promise To Tackle Raging COVID-19 - Now says, "NO HOPE OF DOING SO"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/21/president-joe-biden-faces-pressure-deliver-covid-19-promises/6656526002/ Liars lie, and bullshitters bullshit...and suckers and snowflakes always buy it. Biden hired what HE called an inexperienced and incompetent team, to include a...

www.usmessageboard.com

And Joe won’t stop fracking or the pipeline!

 

[sealybobo]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

You are playing stupid. It is not a good look on you.

Trump was a vulgar braggart. Much of what he said, was not to be taken literally. And people knew that, so no harm done.


But that bit where your side, managed to convince the world that the President of the United States was a ws. or at least liked them.


People died because of that. And more will in the future.

He shouldn’t have palled around with ws then should he have? Remember Obama was palling around with terrorists?

Trump tapped into white victim hood much like you do.

Trump refused to full throatedly condemn ws.

Trump gave a boost to the proud boys when he mentioned them in a debate.

wallace asked trump if he would condemn proud boys he said, “proud boys stand back and stand by.....then changed the subject to antifa and blm. The workd isn’t as dumb as the racists you recruit

 

[Correll]

Unexpectedly!
Just like Obummer they say, LOLZ!

If you like your plan you can keep your plan!

Washington Post ‘Fact Checkers’ Won’t Count False Biden Claims; ‘Assume’ He’ll Be Like Obama | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

Can’t you hire a fact checkers? A Fox Fact checker?

Just start your own app too!

If republicans would benefit from fact checkers they’d use them.

ONe of the "most respected" newspapers in the country, are basing it's operations on positive assumptions about Biden's administration.


That is not us doing anything. That is them admitting that they will be treating teh dem administration under different rules than they treated the republican administration.


We no longer have a Free Press in this country.


That is a real problem.

You act as if republicans and conservative media organizations won’t be fact checking Biden’s every word.

They didn’t find that reagan, bush, Clinton, bush and Obama lied daily. No need to treat every future president like they treated liar trump.

What "conservative" media organizations?

Fox, oan, newsmax.

You guys have enough money to get this done.

Fox? Conservative?

Newsmax DOES fact check the Reich media.

Fact Check on COVID-19 Treatments

According to DW, a German news outlet, here is a fact-check of the most popular COVID-19 treatments.

www.newsmax.com

Suddenly fox isn’t conservative? Another excellent attempt to try to move this country more to the right. By suggesting fox isn’t right. Clever bullshit

You don't pay any attention to what's going on around you at all, do you?

Fox News Moves Left - What's the Reason Behind the Shift?

redstate.com

research demonstrates increasing levels of consolidation, with many media industries already highly concentrated and dominated by a very small number of firms.


Globally, large media conglomerates include Bertelsmann, National Amusements (ViacomCBS), Sony Corporation, News Corp, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T Inc., Fox Corporation, Hearst Communications, MGM Holdings Inc., Grupo Globo (South America), and Lagardère Group.

As of 2020, the largest media conglomerates in terms of revenue are Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, AT&T, and ViacomCBS, per Forbes.

Us liberals were not happy the day Bill Clinton allowed this to happen. You Republicans pushed to get this passed. So now you're telling me these handful of mega corporations are liberal? Bullshit. They are censored though.

Increased concentration of media ownership can lead to corporate censorship affecting a wide range of critical thought.


corporate censorship in the news publishing business, observing that it can occur as self-censorship. They note that it is "virtually impossible to document", because it is covert.Jonathan Alter states that "In a tight job market, the tendency is to avoid getting yourself or your boss in trouble. So an adjective gets dropped, a story skipped, a punch pulled … It's like that Sherlock Holmesstory – the dog that didn't bark.[8] Those clues are hard to find." The head of the Media Access Project notes that such self-censorship is not misreporting or false reporting, but simply not reporting at all. Self-censorship is not the product of "dramatic conspiracies", according to Croteau and Hoynes, but simply the interaction of many small daily decisions. Journalists want to keep their jobs and editors support the interests of the company. These many small actions and non-actions accumulate to produce (in their words) "homogenized, corporate-friendly media".

Nichols and McChesney[9] opine that "the maniacal media baron as portrayed in James Bond films or profiles of Rupert Murdoch is far less a danger than the cautious and compromised editor who seeks to 'balance' a responsibility to readers or viewers with a duty to serve his boss and the advertisers". They state that "even among journalists who entered the field for the noblest of reasons" there is a tendency to avoid any controversial journalism that might embroil the news company in a battle with a powerful corporation or a government agency. They observe that although such conflicts "have always been the stuff of great journalism" they are "very bad business", and that "in the current climate business trumps journalism just about every time".

Croteau and Hoynes[7] report that such corporate censorship in journalism is commonplace, reporting the results of studies revealing that more than 40%[10] of journalists and news executives stating that they had deliberately engaged in such censorship by avoiding newsworthy stories or softening the tones of stories. More than a third of the respondents stated that news organizations would ignore news that might hurt their financial interests. A similar fraction stated that they self-censored in order to further, or not endanger, their careers.

The Fact you Leftards think Joe’s handlers will never lie shows how deranged you are.

I didn't say he would never lie.

It's like you have two kids and one won't stop taking drugs. So you drug test him every day. You don't have to drug test the other kid. Assume he's clean. Innocent until proven a liar. And then we found out Trump didn't even care when he got caught lying. He lied about everything big and small. Remember lying about where the Hurricane hit? Why???

REmember when your side lied about him saying that ws were very fine people?


That was a big one.


Think it impacted the election, that half the country believed that the President was a ws?

You guys were constantly telling us trump didn’t mean what he said. I’m a smart guy. Don’t watch much media. Trump was a liar and conman. It’s laughable you still defend him.

You are playing stupid. It is not a good look on you.

Trump was a vulgar braggart. Much of what he said, was not to be taken literally. And people knew that, so no harm done.


But that bit where your side, managed to convince the world that the President of the United States was a ws. or at least liked them.


People died because of that. And more will in the future.

He shouldn’t have palled around with ws then should he have? Remember Obama was palling around with terrorists?

Trump tapped into white victim hood much like you do.

Trump refused to full throatedly condemn ws.

Trump gave a boost to the proud boys when he mentioned them in a debate.

wallace asked trump if he would condemn proud boys he said, “proud boys stand back and stand by.....then changed the subject to antifa and blm. The workd isn’t as dumb as the racists you recruit

1. Trump did not pal around with ws. That was a lie from your side.

2. Trump did not "tap" into white victim hood. His platform and campaign and policies were aimed at the working poor and middle class.

3. Trump condemned ws plenty and fully. The problem is that the Left kept asking the same question over and over again, as a propaganda ploy to create an illusion of credibility for the accusation.

4. The Proud Boys are not ws. That was another lie from your side.

5. You need to give the wace card a break. Unless you want a civil war.