Was The Windsor/Obergefell Reversal A De Facto Fed Established Religion Move?

[Silhouette]

This poll says otherwise:

Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

That poll just is another indication of your delusion.

So those results of 106 people that voted on it are "imaginary"? I guess people can follow the link and find out for themselves.

 

[Syriusly]

This poll says otherwise:

Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

That poll just is another indication of your delusion.

So those results of 106 people that voted on it are "imaginary"? I guess people can follow the link and find out for themselves.

A) The Poll is statistically irrelevant.
B) Your interpretation of the results of the 'poll' are purely imaginary

 

[rightwinger]

What does race have to do with deviant sex behaviors, legally? Yes, it's up to the states to decide. Until Obergefell overturned that in 2015, when the five rogue un-elected lawyers on the USSC said that the judicial-fed has unilateral rights to legislate marriage values against the states' wishes. (their own gay version of DOMA with teeth)

Unelected?

Where does our constitution call for election of Supreme Coirt Judges!

 

[mdk]

What does race have to do with deviant sex behaviors, legally? Yes, it's up to the states to decide. Until Obergefell overturned that in 2015, when the five rogue un-elected lawyers on the USSC said that the judicial-fed has unilateral rights to legislate marriage values against the states' wishes. (their own gay version of DOMA with teeth)

Unelected?

Where does our constitution call for election of Supreme Coirt Judges!

Those that whine about Supreme Court Justices being "unelected" are trying delegitimize the authority of the court. That is the system the Founding Fathers agreed upon and what Hamilton argued how it should operate in Federalist No. 78.

 

[Syriusly]

What does race have to do with deviant sex behaviors, legally? Yes, it's up to the states to decide. Until Obergefell overturned that in 2015, when the five rogue un-elected lawyers on the USSC said that the judicial-fed has unilateral rights to legislate marriage values against the states' wishes. (their own gay version of DOMA with teeth)

Unelected?

Where does our constitution call for election of Supreme Coirt Judges!

Those that whine about Supreme Court Justices being "unelected" are trying delegitimize the authority of the court. That is the system the Founding Fathers agreed upon and what Hamilton argued how it should operate in Federalist No. 78.

As always with the people who complain about Supreme Court Decisions being unfair- its because they disagree with the decision.

You will never see Silhouette arguing that the Supreme Court didn't have the authority to make a decision she agrees with.

 

[Silhouette]

Im wondering why the USSC erased the Feds power in DOMA; which was correct in Windsor; then they simply inserted the same fed override in Gay DOMA (Obergefell) two years later.

There is no implied protection for deviant sex behaviors in the constitution. They made up those protections as did other recent feats of judicial activism/sedition of the rule of the People. You want protection for deviant sex addicts in the Constitution? Petition your elected representatives because those protections do not exist currently.