Was stumped by a Creationist

[james bond]

Scientists continue not to be stumped by creationists:

Origin of Life --"Complexity Can Emerge Spontaneously, Without Evolution" | The Daily Galaxy

Apparently, you did not understand the article. He's talking about what happens to proteins already existing. His group starts with a "nucleobase linked to the amino acid aspartic acid" which means they have part of the complex DNA and it forms complex ring structures and folding proteins. This is before long time so no evolution is necessary. It argues against evolution and shows the intelligence behind God's design. Gotcha .

 

[james bond]

The Bible isn't history. It's a fairy tale.

How many times can someone be wrong? If it was fantasy, then it would've been disproven already like the others. It's held true since the 1st century discovery. The only reason people do not take it more seriously in science is creation science has been systematically eliminated by the atheist scientists.

There is no creation science

Sure there is. You've been brainwashed. It's science that secular scientists believed in before the 1850s. They believed the universe and everything in it was due to creation per Genesis.

Creation science has very famous scientists in all the variety of sciences -- Creation scientists - creation.com.

 

[james bond]

If God is moral, then how can he approve of slavery? Can anything be more clearly immoral than slavery?

Take it to religious board (then I can explain about King Nimrod). You are a non-scientific nut haha.

 

[bripat9643]

The Bible isn't history. It's a fairy tale.

How many times can someone be wrong? If it was fantasy, then it would've been disproven already like the others. It's held true since the 1st century discovery. The only reason people do not take it more seriously in science is creation science has been systematically eliminated by the atheist scientists.

There is no creation science

Sure there is. You've been brainwashed. It's science that secular scientists believed in before the 1850s. They believed the universe and everything in it was due to creation per Genesis.

Creation science has very famous scientists in all the variety of sciences -- Creation scientists - creation.com.

That isn't science. It's abracadabra.

 

[bripat9643]

If God is moral, then how can he approve of slavery? Can anything be more clearly immoral than slavery?

Take it to religious board (then I can explain about King Nimrod). You are a non-scientific nut haha.

Obviously, you're afraid to answer the question.

The Bible isn't science. You keep whining when I ask you questions about the Bible, and then you constantly refer to the Bible when anyone asks you about your "creation science." If you don't want to talk about the Bible, then quit referring to it in this thread.

 

[james bond]

Yet, nobody has observed this happened for DNA --> RNA --> Proteins.

So what? Nobody has ever seen an electron, either.and most certainly nobody has ever seen magical sky daddy or a zombie King.

Nobody has seen an electron, but we've seen atomic level using electrons. All of that is being worked on at LHC where we still have not observed any universes being created .

What you are deliberately ignoring is DNA --> RNA --> Proteins only happens inside the cell. Only life begats life by Louis Pasteur. Or scientists start with the DNA or parts of the DNA in order to do their lab work as we learned from Sijbren Otto. Thanks for that link .

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

His group starts with a "nucleobase linked to the amino acid aspartic acid" which means they have part of the complex DNA and it forms complex ring structures and folding proteins.

Haha, that's not what that means at all. In fact, the article makes it plainly clear that that is precisely NOT what that is. You didn't even read the entire article. Just shut the **** up already.

 

[james bond]

Haha, that's not what that means at all. In fact, the article makes it plainly clear that that is precisely NOT what that is. You didn't even read the entire article. Just shut the **** up already.

Too much lying and wrongness. I hope you're still not in the 7th grade.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Haha, that's not what that means at all. In fact, the article makes it plainly clear that that is precisely NOT what that is. You didn't even read the entire article. Just shut the **** up already.

Too much lying and wrongness. I hope you're still not in the 7th grade.

You have no idea what that article says and didn't even read it. Else you would not have said something so wrong and stupid.

 

[bripat9643]

Haha, that's not what that means at all. In fact, the article makes it plainly clear that that is precisely NOT what that is. You didn't even read the entire article. Just shut the **** up already.

Too much lying and wrongness. I hope you're still not in the 7th grade.

Irony!