Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bishop Willard went from saber rattling over Iran to a dove with an olive branch in its mouth. Bishop Willard will start his apology tour next week.I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
not sure he put pay to tea party. they would want some stuff once in power and so will neo-consRomney, of course, was more moderate last night.
1. The center, not the far right, has the votes to make him President.
2. He is, essentially, a moderate Republican, not much different than Ford or Nixon, who has had to play to the doofi section our disharmonious party.
Once elected, he puts paid to the Tea Party: about time.
not sure he put pay to tea party. they would want some stuff once in power and so will neo-consRomney, of course, was more moderate last night.
1. The center, not the far right, has the votes to make him President.
2. He is, essentially, a moderate Republican, not much different than Ford or Nixon, who has had to play to the doofi section our disharmonious party.
Once elected, he puts paid to the Tea Party: about time.
we see but hope he leads from center.
promblem is that with reid and peroisi still leading dems in congress on one side and mconnel and bohenir on the other, it be hard to bring those factions together to get anything doneAll he needsd are their votes this time, because he intends to make deals with the Dems that Bush, Boehner, and McConnell would not.
not sure he put pay to tea party. they would want some stuff once in power and so will neo-consRomney, of course, was more moderate last night.
1. The center, not the far right, has the votes to make him President.
2. He is, essentially, a moderate Republican, not much different than Ford or Nixon, who has had to play to the doofi section our disharmonious party.
Once elected, he puts paid to the Tea Party: about time.
we see but hope he leads from center.
promblem is that with reid and peroisi still leading dems in congress on one side and mconnel and bohenir on the other, it be hard to bring those factions together to get anything doneAll he needsd are their votes this time, because he intends to make deals with the Dems that Bush, Boehner, and McConnell would not.
not sure he put pay to tea party. they would want some stuff once in power and so will neo-cons
we see but hope he leads from center.
congress still going to be very hard to work with in next four years. Romney need hope paul ryan can charm paints of dems and tea party people in congress
I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
President Obama blasted Mitt Romney at the foreign policy debate, saying he had given no correct answers on national security.
"Gov. Romney, I'm glad you recognize al-Qaeda is a threat, because a few months ago when you were asked what is the biggest geopolitical group facing America, you said Russia — not al-Qaeda. And the 1980's are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back — because the Cold War has been over for 20 years. But Governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980's, just like the social policy of the 1950's, and the economic policies of the 1920's.
"You say that you're not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq but just a few weeks ago, you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now. And the challenge we have, I know you haven't been in a position to actually execute foreign policy, but every time you've offered an opinion, you've been wrong. You said we should have gone into Iraq despite the fact there were no weapons of mass destruction. You said that we should still have troops in Iraq to this day. You indicated that we shouldn't be passing nuclear treaties with Russia despite the fact that 71 senators, Democrats and Republicans, voted for it. You said that first we should not have a time line in Afghanistan. Then you said we should. Now you say maybe. Or it depends. Which means not only were you wrong but you're also confusing in sending mixed messages to our troops and our allies.
"So what we need to do with respect to the middle east is strong, steady leadership, not wrong and reckless leadership that is all over the map. And unfortunately, that is the kind of opinions that you've offered throughout this campaign. And it is not a recipe for american strength or keeping america safe."
I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
The President's strongest approval numbers have been foreign policy.
The strategy by Romney was to try to erase the distinction between the 2 of them, so Romney can in effect coattail off Obama in an area where he can't win by disagreeing with the President generally.
Don't forget, too, Romney knows about as much about foreign policy as Sarah Palin did in 2008.
promblem is that with reid and peroisi still leading dems in congress on one side and mconnel and bohenir on the other, it be hard to bring those factions together to get anything doneAll he needsd are their votes this time, because he intends to make deals with the Dems that Bush, Boehner, and McConnell would not.
congress still going to be very hard to work with in next four years. Romney need hope paul ryan can charm paints of dems and tea party people in congress
It will be much different when they are both minority party next year.
Exactly, after Bishop Willard accused Obama of "leading from behind" on foreign policy, Bishop Willard has chosen to lead from behind Obama!!!I could have sworn that Mitt was saying the same things Obama was saying. This dude gets more moderate as the debates go on. Good thing for him this was the last one. One more and he would be a democrat.
The President's strongest approval numbers have been foreign policy.
The strategy by Romney was to try to erase the distinction between the 2 of them, so Romney can in effect coattail off Obama in an area where he can't win by disagreeing with the President generally.
Don't forget, too, Romney knows about as much about foreign policy as Sarah Palin did in 2008.
