Was Iowa Caucus fixed?

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Nov 2, 2015
739
393
940
CAUCUS-MICROSOFT-FRAUD.jpg



Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?
That is the question The Political Insider and others are asking now.
Sinister Plot EXPOSED To RIG IOWA CAUCUS! (And Steal Victory Away From Trump?)

Without Cruz campaign workers spreading the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race, it's doubtful he could have won. That puts Cruz's character into serious question but first there is the question of Marco Rubio.

I cannot believe that Marco Rubio was in a close tie with Donald Trump for 2nd place. Rubio has been consistently trailing behind Cruz and Carson and now he is almost tied with the GOP frontrunner for 2nd place? There simply isn't any evidence to support the numbers Rubio received. Trump's calling card has been his ability to draw large crowds. Iowa reported an unusually large turnout. What happened?

Stalin once said, “The people who cast the votes do not decide an election, the people who count the votes do."

So who tallied the votes at the Iowa Caucus?
Bill Gates - Microsoft.

According to a news report from The Political Insider, Bill Gates volunteered to provide the technology for tallying caucus votes at the Iowa Caucus. Bill Gates is a major political donor and pro-amnesty advocate. The news source reported that Microsoft wanted to see Rubio's HB-1 visas for guests become law. Gates is the 12th largest employer of HB-1 workers and the the 2nd largest contributor to Sen. Marco Rubio since 2011.

Senator Ted Cruz has also come out in support of expanding HB-1.

Donald Trump is funding his own campaign and is against HB-1.
Mr. Trump calls it “job theft.”

One of Rubio's biggest financial backers, who supports HB-1, was in charge of tallying Iowa Caucuses.
One of Marco Rubio's Biggest Financial Backers to Tally Iowa Caucuses - Breitbart

We the People, take it for granted that fair elections are a certainty because we do not see what is going on behind the scenes. Is it possible that the Iowa Caucus could have been fixed?

After Al Franken stole an election from Norm Coleman in front of the entire nation (and got away with it), anything is possible. Lawlessness doesn't begin on the streets. It begins at the very top.

There should be a paper trail for every vote. I believe a serious examination of how the votes are counted and by whom, is in order. By all accounts, Trump should have won.

Trump has consistently had the largest turn out by far, of all the candidates. There was an unexpected large turn out for the Iowa Caucus. What happened?

If the American people do not already realize there is a concerted effort to stop Trump from being nominated, something is wrong. We need to be vigilant in defending the truth no matter the cost. Expect to be mocked by Clinton, Rubio and Cruz supporters who will take a win even if it took cheating to get there. Politics is known to be a dirty business and the powerful Corporations that lobby for their own agenda are cut from the same cloth.

The numbers simply do not add up in the story of the Iowa Caucus. The Political Insider just may be onto something. Time will tell.

As a Christian, I believe that Ted Cruz revealed a serious lack of character in permitting his own campaign workers to spread the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race. The votes Ben Carson would have received went to Ted Cruz. That should be factored in when looking at the story of how Cruz won Iowa.



I don't believe the Iowa Caucus proved anything except perhaps how easy it is to corrupt a poll or an election.

As the media continues to reserve its worst attacks for Donald Trump, it is apparent Trump is becoming stronger, not weaker. The American people will need to be careful not to buy into the illusion that Trump has been “pierced.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

The stakes are high and some are willing to do anything to win.
Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?
 
The election was fair, I believe.

And if it was not, the commission will discover who was involved and take legal action
 
The election was fair, I believe.

And if it was not, the commission will discover who was involved and take legal action
Sure it was fair, 6 out of 6 coin tosses went to the vagina. I mean whenever I do a coin toss, I never get 6 out of 6 for 1 side.


6 out of 6 is proof that God wants Hillary to win.
Or 6 out of 6 is proof that the liberals are stupid enough to vote for a vagina but not stupid enough to vote for a TRUE socialist who wants to tax everyone 90%.
 
parts of the process are good, but for the democrats in the first of the nation contest to count as nonviable anyone under 15% is a mistake......Iowa democrats should, at least in what they publicize, go with the initial vote breakdown, then if they want to consolidate for later determination of delegates fine. But first in the nation should just give how the initial vote went.

I mean I would like to have known how much support O'maly had,...not reported.
 
Drumpf is whining that Cruz cheated and demands a recount.
Bernie is asking for a re-count as well. I think he was cheated as well.
Democrats never cheat, lie or steal. Didn't you know that? ROTFLMAO
Well its like that "Luddly" idiot on this thread saying cross party this or that. Its not even a cross party issue. That comes later. It was IN party cheating and that idiot is either missing it or in denial of it.

Did Cruz try and cheat Carson? Yes.
Was it illegal? No.

Did Hillary try and cheat Bernie? Yes.
Was it illegal? Maybe.

Since it was IN party cheating the issue is NOT partisan but ethics IN the parties and BOTH sides showed a lack of them. It only becomes partisan when party hack quacks like "Luddly" make it so to derail the topic.

And I think the topic the OP is going for IS both sides IN party CHEATING.
 
parts of the process are good, but for the democrats in the first of the nation contest to count as nonviable anyone under 15% is a mistake......Iowa democrats should, at least in what they publicize, go with the initial vote breakdown, then if they want to consolidate for later determination of delegates fine. But first in the nation should just give how the initial vote went.

I mean I would like to have known how much support O'maly had,...not reported.
The DNC should ALLOW democrats to vote. That system they are using is perfect for scams and theft.
 
CAUCUS-MICROSOFT-FRAUD.jpg



Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?
That is the question The Political Insider and others are asking now.
Sinister Plot EXPOSED To RIG IOWA CAUCUS! (And Steal Victory Away From Trump?)

Without Cruz campaign workers spreading the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race, it's doubtful he could have won. That puts Cruz's character into serious question but first there is the question of Marco Rubio.

I cannot believe that Marco Rubio was in a close tie with Donald Trump for 2nd place. Rubio has been consistently trailing behind Cruz and Carson and now he is almost tied with the GOP frontrunner for 2nd place? There simply isn't any evidence to support the numbers Rubio received. Trump's calling card has been his ability to draw large crowds. Iowa reported an unusually large turnout. What happened?

Stalin once said, “The people who cast the votes do not decide an election, the people who count the votes do."

So who tallied the votes at the Iowa Caucus?
Bill Gates - Microsoft.

According to a news report from The Political Insider, Bill Gates volunteered to provide the technology for tallying caucus votes at the Iowa Caucus. Bill Gates is a major political donor and pro-amnesty advocate. The news source reported that Microsoft wanted to see Rubio's HB-1 visas for guests become law. Gates is the 12th largest employer of HB-1 workers and the the 2nd largest contributor to Sen. Marco Rubio since 2011.

Senator Ted Cruz has also come out in support of expanding HB-1.

Donald Trump is funding his own campaign and is against HB-1.
Mr. Trump calls it “job theft.”

One of Rubio's biggest financial backers, who supports HB-1, was in charge of tallying Iowa Caucuses.
One of Marco Rubio's Biggest Financial Backers to Tally Iowa Caucuses - Breitbart

We the People, take it for granted that fair elections are a certainty because we do not see what is going on behind the scenes. Is it possible that the Iowa Caucus could have been fixed?

After Al Franken stole an election from Norm Coleman in front of the entire nation (and got away with it), anything is possible. Lawlessness doesn't begin on the streets. It begins at the very top.

There should be a paper trail for every vote. I believe a serious examination of how the votes are counted and by whom, is in order. By all accounts, Trump should have won.

Trump has consistently had the largest turn out by far, of all the candidates. There was an unexpected large turn out for the Iowa Caucus. What happened?

If the American people do not already realize there is a concerted effort to stop Trump from being nominated, something is wrong. We need to be vigilant in defending the truth no matter the cost. Expect to be mocked by Clinton, Rubio and Cruz supporters who will take a win even if it took cheating to get there. Politics is known to be a dirty business and the powerful Corporations that lobby for their own agenda are cut from the same cloth.

The numbers simply do not add up in the story of the Iowa Caucus. The Political Insider just may be onto something. Time will tell.

As a Christian, I believe that Ted Cruz revealed a serious lack of character in permitting his own campaign workers to spread the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race. The votes Ben Carson would have received went to Ted Cruz. That should be factored in when looking at the story of how Cruz won Iowa.



I don't believe the Iowa Caucus proved anything except perhaps how easy it is to corrupt a poll or an election.

As the media continues to reserve its worst attacks for Donald Trump, it is apparent Trump is becoming stronger, not weaker. The American people will need to be careful not to buy into the illusion that Trump has been “pierced.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

The stakes are high and some are willing to do anything to win.
Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?

Republicans didn't care when the GOP stole Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. Maybe they'll care when the GOP decides who the nominee will be, not Republican voters.

It's ok when your side steals an election.

And I've told you all yes this is all for show. Ben Carson was never a serious contender except for religious nuts who apparently decide the Iowa caucus'. So winning Iowa is just to make the religious right think that the GOP cares and is trying to represent them. Ultimately the GOP will give you Rubio and the religious right will swallow it and vote for that RINO.
 
CAUCUS-MICROSOFT-FRAUD.jpg



Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?
That is the question The Political Insider and others are asking now.
Sinister Plot EXPOSED To RIG IOWA CAUCUS! (And Steal Victory Away From Trump?)

Without Cruz campaign workers spreading the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race, it's doubtful he could have won. That puts Cruz's character into serious question but first there is the question of Marco Rubio.

I cannot believe that Marco Rubio was in a close tie with Donald Trump for 2nd place. Rubio has been consistently trailing behind Cruz and Carson and now he is almost tied with the GOP frontrunner for 2nd place? There simply isn't any evidence to support the numbers Rubio received. Trump's calling card has been his ability to draw large crowds. Iowa reported an unusually large turnout. What happened?

Stalin once said, “The people who cast the votes do not decide an election, the people who count the votes do."

So who tallied the votes at the Iowa Caucus?
Bill Gates - Microsoft.

According to a news report from The Political Insider, Bill Gates volunteered to provide the technology for tallying caucus votes at the Iowa Caucus. Bill Gates is a major political donor and pro-amnesty advocate. The news source reported that Microsoft wanted to see Rubio's HB-1 visas for guests become law. Gates is the 12th largest employer of HB-1 workers and the the 2nd largest contributor to Sen. Marco Rubio since 2011.

Senator Ted Cruz has also come out in support of expanding HB-1.

Donald Trump is funding his own campaign and is against HB-1.
Mr. Trump calls it “job theft.”

One of Rubio's biggest financial backers, who supports HB-1, was in charge of tallying Iowa Caucuses.
One of Marco Rubio's Biggest Financial Backers to Tally Iowa Caucuses - Breitbart

We the People, take it for granted that fair elections are a certainty because we do not see what is going on behind the scenes. Is it possible that the Iowa Caucus could have been fixed?

After Al Franken stole an election from Norm Coleman in front of the entire nation (and got away with it), anything is possible. Lawlessness doesn't begin on the streets. It begins at the very top.

There should be a paper trail for every vote. I believe a serious examination of how the votes are counted and by whom, is in order. By all accounts, Trump should have won.

Trump has consistently had the largest turn out by far, of all the candidates. There was an unexpected large turn out for the Iowa Caucus. What happened?

If the American people do not already realize there is a concerted effort to stop Trump from being nominated, something is wrong. We need to be vigilant in defending the truth no matter the cost. Expect to be mocked by Clinton, Rubio and Cruz supporters who will take a win even if it took cheating to get there. Politics is known to be a dirty business and the powerful Corporations that lobby for their own agenda are cut from the same cloth.

The numbers simply do not add up in the story of the Iowa Caucus. The Political Insider just may be onto something. Time will tell.

As a Christian, I believe that Ted Cruz revealed a serious lack of character in permitting his own campaign workers to spread the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race. The votes Ben Carson would have received went to Ted Cruz. That should be factored in when looking at the story of how Cruz won Iowa.



I don't believe the Iowa Caucus proved anything except perhaps how easy it is to corrupt a poll or an election.

As the media continues to reserve its worst attacks for Donald Trump, it is apparent Trump is becoming stronger, not weaker. The American people will need to be careful not to buy into the illusion that Trump has been “pierced.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

The stakes are high and some are willing to do anything to win.
Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?

Republicans didn't care when the GOP stole Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. Maybe they'll care when the GOP decides who the nominee will be, not Republican voters.

It's ok when your side steals an election.

And I've told you all yes this is all for show. Ben Carson was never a serious contender except for religious nuts who apparently decide the Iowa caucus'. So winning Iowa is just to make the religious right think that the GOP cares and is trying to represent them. Ultimately the GOP will give you Rubio and the religious right will swallow it and vote for that RINO.

The state counted the votes in Florida the way Gore wanted and Gore lost. Had they counted them the way Bush wanted them counted Bush would have lost.

But that is not the OP's topic now is it? Try again idiot.
 
CAUCUS-MICROSOFT-FRAUD.jpg



Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?
That is the question The Political Insider and others are asking now.
Sinister Plot EXPOSED To RIG IOWA CAUCUS! (And Steal Victory Away From Trump?)

Without Cruz campaign workers spreading the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race, it's doubtful he could have won. That puts Cruz's character into serious question but first there is the question of Marco Rubio.

I cannot believe that Marco Rubio was in a close tie with Donald Trump for 2nd place. Rubio has been consistently trailing behind Cruz and Carson and now he is almost tied with the GOP frontrunner for 2nd place? There simply isn't any evidence to support the numbers Rubio received. Trump's calling card has been his ability to draw large crowds. Iowa reported an unusually large turnout. What happened?

Stalin once said, “The people who cast the votes do not decide an election, the people who count the votes do."

So who tallied the votes at the Iowa Caucus?
Bill Gates - Microsoft.

According to a news report from The Political Insider, Bill Gates volunteered to provide the technology for tallying caucus votes at the Iowa Caucus. Bill Gates is a major political donor and pro-amnesty advocate. The news source reported that Microsoft wanted to see Rubio's HB-1 visas for guests become law. Gates is the 12th largest employer of HB-1 workers and the the 2nd largest contributor to Sen. Marco Rubio since 2011.

Senator Ted Cruz has also come out in support of expanding HB-1.

Donald Trump is funding his own campaign and is against HB-1.
Mr. Trump calls it “job theft.”

One of Rubio's biggest financial backers, who supports HB-1, was in charge of tallying Iowa Caucuses.
One of Marco Rubio's Biggest Financial Backers to Tally Iowa Caucuses - Breitbart

We the People, take it for granted that fair elections are a certainty because we do not see what is going on behind the scenes. Is it possible that the Iowa Caucus could have been fixed?

After Al Franken stole an election from Norm Coleman in front of the entire nation (and got away with it), anything is possible. Lawlessness doesn't begin on the streets. It begins at the very top.

There should be a paper trail for every vote. I believe a serious examination of how the votes are counted and by whom, is in order. By all accounts, Trump should have won.

Trump has consistently had the largest turn out by far, of all the candidates. There was an unexpected large turn out for the Iowa Caucus. What happened?

If the American people do not already realize there is a concerted effort to stop Trump from being nominated, something is wrong. We need to be vigilant in defending the truth no matter the cost. Expect to be mocked by Clinton, Rubio and Cruz supporters who will take a win even if it took cheating to get there. Politics is known to be a dirty business and the powerful Corporations that lobby for their own agenda are cut from the same cloth.

The numbers simply do not add up in the story of the Iowa Caucus. The Political Insider just may be onto something. Time will tell.

As a Christian, I believe that Ted Cruz revealed a serious lack of character in permitting his own campaign workers to spread the word that Dr. Ben Carson had dropped out of the race. The votes Ben Carson would have received went to Ted Cruz. That should be factored in when looking at the story of how Cruz won Iowa.



I don't believe the Iowa Caucus proved anything except perhaps how easy it is to corrupt a poll or an election.

As the media continues to reserve its worst attacks for Donald Trump, it is apparent Trump is becoming stronger, not weaker. The American people will need to be careful not to buy into the illusion that Trump has been “pierced.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

The stakes are high and some are willing to do anything to win.
Was the Iowa Caucus fixed?

Republicans didn't care when the GOP stole Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. Maybe they'll care when the GOP decides who the nominee will be, not Republican voters.

It's ok when your side steals an election.

And I've told you all yes this is all for show. Ben Carson was never a serious contender except for religious nuts who apparently decide the Iowa caucus'. So winning Iowa is just to make the religious right think that the GOP cares and is trying to represent them. Ultimately the GOP will give you Rubio and the religious right will swallow it and vote for that RINO.

I guess you didn't know that there were 7 recounts on the hanging chad, that Al Gore just couldn't believe didn't go his way? Each of those recounts cost US taxpayers money, and finally the supreme court said that 7 was the magic number and the election went to Bush. God you liberals are dumber than a box of rocks.
 
... I mean whenever I do a coin toss, I never get 6 out of 6 for 1 side.
Here's some FACTS for you to chew on:

FACT:
There were more than a dozen coin tosses.

FACT: The ratio of Clinton to Sanders wins was closer to 50-50

FACT: Even *if* Clinton won what was initially reported - 6 out of 6 - which she didn't - it would make little difference in the outcome. The effect of these coin tosses is negligible.

FACT: There are 1,681 precincts in Iowa

FACT: A tie could have happened at any one of these 1,681 caucus locations, and the rules call for a coin toss in case of a tie.

FACT: The awarding of delegates at these precincts is for county delegates, not actual final convention delegates

FACT: There are 99 counties in Iowa.

FACT: 11,065 delegates from precinct caucuses go to the county conventions.

FACT: Those 11,065 delegates is narrowed down to 1,406 who will attend congressional district conventions and later, state conventions.

FACT: Complicated, isn't it? But to get us to the awarding of actual national delegates (Iowa gets 44) ... have these FACTS given you an indication of just how silly the premise of this newest con-spearOh!see? theory is?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top