Wall Street Democrats..

[Lumpy 1]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

 

[uscitizen]

Of course the dems sucked up the donations. Only fools thought Palin would win.

Who wants to bet on the losing horse in a 2 horse race?

 

[VaYank5150]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

Yet strangely enough, it was a Republican President who bailed them out. And let's not forget the effort of the GOP Presidential candidate who actually suspended his POTUS campaign just to ensure this deal went through.

 

[Oddball]

This cartoon is prescient in all of these Wall Street threads...Get used to seeing it.

 

[uscitizen]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

Yet strangely enough, it was a Republican President who bailed them out. And let's not forget the effort of the GOP Presidential candidate who actually suspended his POTUS campaign just to ensure this deal went through.

Yeah but did not work to well for McCain did it?
Wall street knew who would win.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

Yet strangely enough, it was a Republican President who bailed them out. And let's not forget the effort of the GOP Presidential candidate who actually suspended his POTUS campaign just to ensure this deal went through.

Well.. I guess that makes it okay with you then......

hmm... how did that vote go again..

my..my and who controlled the purse strings..

ah.. memories..

 

[Lumpy 1]

Of course the dems sucked up the donations. Only fools thought Palin would win.

Who wants to bet on the losing horse in a 2 horse race?

Ah yes winning.. nothing else matters.....

 

[uscitizen]

Of course the dems sucked up the donations. Only fools thought Palin would win.

Who wants to bet on the losing horse in a 2 horse race?

Ah yes winning.. nothing else matters.....

To corporation and politicians yes.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Of course the dems sucked up the donations. Only fools thought Palin would win.

Who wants to bet on the losing horse in a 2 horse race?

Ah yes winning.. nothing else matters.....

To corporation and politicians yes.

Oh... that's what you meant...

 

[uscitizen]

Ah yes winning.. nothing else matters.....

To corporation and politicians yes.

Oh... that's what you meant...

Umm you lost me on that.

 

[Lumpy 1]

More on the.. in your face... Masters of smoke and mirrors..

I guess Democrats are so used of the press colluding with them, they've lost their fear of discovery..

Most Wall Street firms are heavy contributors to members of the democratic party:

President Obama (Open Secrets)
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
UBS AG $543,219
Morgan Stanley $514,881

Harry Reid (Open Secrets)
Apollo Advisors $66,900
JPMorgan Chase $61,100
Blackstone Group $55,700
Fidelity (FMR Corp) $43,200

Chuck Schumer (Open Secrets)
Credit Suisse Group $63,650
New York Life Insurance $49,300
MBF Clearing Corp $48,000
Pershing Square Capital Management $36,999 (Hedge Fund)
Blue Ridge Capital $36,000 (Hedge Fund)
Newmark Knight Frank $35,700

Democratic Party Problems with Goldman Sachs – Obama accepted $994,795 in campaign contributions. | Monroerising.com

 

[Flopper]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

Wall Street just like most big corporate donors go with the winner. They start off contributing to both campaigns. As the elections approaches and they think they know the winner, they will increase contributions unless they feel additional donations won't buy them anything. This holds true for all parties and all elections.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Well... you could talk about Bush and Enron contributions but then that was just pocket change compared to Obama and the Democrats...but I'm guessing Democrats no longer care... a convenience of memory..

--------------------------------------------

When President Barack Obama's vast new regulatory state is completed, Wall Street firms ought to have a competition over the naming rights.

Will it be the CitiDeal? Or the Goldman Society? Or the UBS/J.P. Morgan Joint Initiative for the Establishment of a Social Democracy

The Democratic majority was bought and paid for by Wall Street and corporate money. The Masters of the Universe helped give us the Masters of the Beltway, in a synergistic exercise that would have dumbfounded even Lenin.

Democrats beat Republicans in the Wall Street money chase in 2006, and kept on going. In the 2008 election cycle, Democrats garnered 73 percent of the political donations of Goldman Sachs, as well as the majority of donations from other financial giants such as UBS and Citigroup. They soaked up most of the hedge-fund money, and won the battle for donations from industries as varied as health care, defense, and law.

RealClearPolitics - The Wall Street Democrats

Wall Street just like most big corporate donors go with the winner. They start off contributing to both campaigns. As the elections approaches and they think they know the winner, they will increase contributions unless they feel additional donations won't buy them anything. This holds true for all parties and all elections.

I can hardly disagree but do you recognize the hypocrisy? (by the the way, I hate the word hypocrisy)

 

[Lumpy 1]

 

[VaYank5150]

More on the.. in your face... Masters of smoke and mirrors..

I guess Democrats are so used of the press colluding with them, they've lost their fear of discovery..

Most Wall Street firms are heavy contributors to members of the democratic party:

President Obama (Open Secrets)
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
UBS AG $543,219
Morgan Stanley $514,881

Harry Reid (Open Secrets)
Apollo Advisors $66,900
JPMorgan Chase $61,100
Blackstone Group $55,700
Fidelity (FMR Corp) $43,200

Chuck Schumer (Open Secrets)
Credit Suisse Group $63,650
New York Life Insurance $49,300
MBF Clearing Corp $48,000
Pershing Square Capital Management $36,999 (Hedge Fund)
Blue Ridge Capital $36,000 (Hedge Fund)
Newmark Knight Frank $35,700

Democratic Party Problems with Goldman Sachs – Obama accepted $994,795 in campaign contributions. | Monroerising.com

Point?

 

[jillian]

Of course the dems sucked up the donations. Only fools thought Palin would win.

Who wants to bet on the losing horse in a 2 horse race?

why wouldn't dems have taken donations?

what a stupid idea....

 

[uscitizen]

The right is just whining because they did nto get the contributions.

 

[jillian]

The right is just whining because they did nto get the contributions.

they should have nominated romney for VP instead of letting the religious right shape their agenda... then they'd have gotten the donations.

treating people like they were stupid enough to vote for palin because she wore a skirt was simply insulting.

 

[VaYank5150]

The right is just whining because they did nto get the contributions.

And there are all those lesbian sex act show bills piling up too!

 

[VaYank5150]

The right is just whining because they did nto get the contributions.

they should have nominated romney for VP instead of letting the religious right shape their agenda... then they'd have gotten the donations.

treating people like they were stupid enough to vote for palin because she wore a skirt was simply insulting.

Oh, so are you saying women voters in the US won't vote for a ticket just because they put ANY woman on it?