w0w....RECORD cooling over last 8 months!!!

skookerasbil

Platinum Member
Aug 6, 2009
37,962
6,380
1,140
Not the middle of nowhere
Co2 levels are going up, but the enso has switched from nino to nina. This means that the energy remains in the oceans of the pacific instead of moving into the atmosphere.

Anyone that doesn't understand this is a moron and a idiot.
 
Co2 levels are going up, but the enso has switched from nino to nina. This means that the energy remains in the oceans of the pacific instead of moving into the atmosphere.

Anyone that doesn't understand this is a moron and a idiot.
Not to mention scientifically illiterate and gullible.
.
 
Anyone who believes that atmospheric CO2 levels will be 900 ppm by the year 2100 and the sea level will raise by 1 meter by the year 2100 is a fool.
The sea level will rise by a meter long before the 900 ppm level is reached, and modern civilization will be a shattered wreck long before the 900 ppm level could be reached.
.
 
Anyone who believes that atmospheric CO2 levels will be 900 ppm by the year 2100 and the sea level will raise by 1 meter by the year 2100 is a fool.
The sea level will rise by a meter long before the 900 ppm level is reached, and modern civilization will be a shattered wreck long before the 900 ppm level could be reached.
.
You do realize that the IPCC has more than one forecast right? If so, then do you realize that the one you believe will happen is their most pessimistic case, right?
 
Anyone who believes that atmospheric CO2 levels will be 900 ppm by the year 2100 and the sea level will raise by 1 meter by the year 2100 is a fool.
The sea level will rise by a meter long before the 900 ppm level is reached, and modern civilization will be a shattered wreck long before the 900 ppm level could be reached.
.



but nobody is caring s0n.............. :popcorn:......theyve been hearing this shit about CO2 for decades and nothing happens :spinner::spinner:. A majority of the folks don't believe in AGW.



Oh.....notice......the religion doesn't believe in the satellite data. Only their data.:2up:



ghey




more losing:boobies:
 
Can't be science behind a group that believes CO2 is the driver in climate change, yet doesn't model correctly or show direct cause. You guys basically have a cult going.
 
If you can't realize that we just came off the biggest nino in recorded history. I really feel sorry for you. Dumb.
And yet no step increase in GAT.. So either your cult leaders have lied and doctored the data or we have seen the end of cycle spike and cooling is now happening rapidly..

My bet is on Cooling and natural change is happening rapidly now. Arctic temps have dropped now and are 2 deg C below average..

Hold on for the ride..
 
Anyone who believes that atmospheric CO2 levels will be 900 ppm by the year 2100 and the sea level will raise by 1 meter by the year 2100 is a fool.
The sea level will rise by a meter long before the 900 ppm level is reached, and modern civilization will be a shattered wreck long before the 900 ppm level could be reached.
.
You do realize that the IPCC has more than one forecast right? If so, then do you realize that the one you believe will happen is their most pessimistic case, right?
You do realize that all of the IPCC predilections have failed by a factor of >6 Standard derivations, Right? in other words their model outputs are TRASH......
 
Co2 levels are going up, but the enso has switched from nino to nina. This means that the energy remains in the oceans of the pacific instead of moving into the atmosphere.

Anyone that doesn't understand this is a moron and a idiot.

You don't have a dam clue about the charge /discharge cycles of the oceans..
 
Anyone who believes that atmospheric CO2 levels will be 900 ppm by the year 2100 and the sea level will raise by 1 meter by the year 2100 is a fool.
The sea level will rise by a meter long before the 900 ppm level is reached, and modern civilization will be a shattered wreck long before the 900 ppm level could be reached.
.
You do realize that the IPCC has more than one forecast right? If so, then do you realize that the one you believe will happen is their most pessimistic case, right?
You do realize that all of the IPCC predilections have failed by a factor of >6 Standard derivations, Right? in other words their model outputs are TRASH......
Yes, I do.
 
Co2 levels are going up, but the enso has switched from nino to nina. This means that the energy remains in the oceans of the pacific instead of moving into the atmosphere.

Anyone that doesn't understand this is a moron and a idiot.

You don't have a dam clue about the charge /discharge cycles of the oceans..

More than you do. Child. The fact that you're arguing the enso when the national weather service says otherwise shows that you don't.
 


Click for high-resolution image. —Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center



Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

Now that really looks like a cooling, right? Arctic sea ice almost 3 standard deviations below normal. And the Antarctic Sea Ice is also almost 3 standard deviations below normal. And 2016 will be the third year in a row breaking record temperatures globally. Once again, jc, Silly Billy, and Mr. Westwall have all declared that we began a cooling years ago. Wonder what alternative universe they are living in.
 

Forum List

Back
Top