Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Baloney..........if I'd been accused of rape when I was innocent I'd go to jail for knocking your lights out.Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.Oddly enough, I supported him through the entire process, even her testimony, until he opened his asinine mouth. The performance that he put on in front of the committee was not something that I would support going to the bench.
Because what? You think an emotionless robot, who reacts in a completely inhuman, unnatural way to being accused of being a RAPIST, is somehow desirable? Tell me how calm YOU would have been in the same position.
Btw, anyone who thinks judges don't routinely get pissy, bad-tempered, and downright angry has never actually met a judge, and is talking out of his ass.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He was actually much calmer then I'd ever been................I would have told you to shove the job up your ass........Have filed law suits against the accuser for Slander and Deformation of Character....................and taken a job for millions a year at a law firm in his shoes.
This entire Circus was a joke..........Ford's testimony was a joke..........Can't say when or where........and all the people supposedly there don't remember a dang thing...............Laughed out of court had they tried.......
If she has REAL EVIDENCE..........File a complaint in Maryland with REAL evidence and they will charge him............She isn't going to do that because this whole thing is a lie.
Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.Oddly enough, I supported him through the entire process, even her testimony, until he opened his asinine mouth. The performance that he put on in front of the committee was not something that I would support going to the bench.I don’t like Kavanaugh but he is qualified. I don’t think opposing him on purely partisan lines is good for the courts. It IS the president’s prerogative to be able to fill a vacancy, despite the shameful behavior of the Republicans.
Because what? You think an emotionless robot, who reacts in a completely inhuman, unnatural way to being accused of being a RAPIST, is somehow desirable? Tell me how calm YOU would have been in the same position.
Btw, anyone who thinks judges don't routinely get pissy, bad-tempered, and downright angry has never actually met a judge, and is talking out of his ass.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.Oddly enough, I supported him through the entire process, even her testimony, until he opened his asinine mouth. The performance that he put on in front of the committee was not something that I would support going to the bench.
Because what? You think an emotionless robot, who reacts in a completely inhuman, unnatural way to being accused of being a RAPIST, is somehow desirable? Tell me how calm YOU would have been in the same position.
Btw, anyone who thinks judges don't routinely get pissy, bad-tempered, and downright angry has never actually met a judge, and is talking out of his ass.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.Because what? You think an emotionless robot, who reacts in a completely inhuman, unnatural way to being accused of being a RAPIST, is somehow desirable? Tell me how calm YOU would have been in the same position.
Btw, anyone who thinks judges don't routinely get pissy, bad-tempered, and downright angry has never actually met a judge, and is talking out of his ass.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
Get over what?Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
Executive priveledge wasnt cited in a demand for similar documents from Kagen. As a result the Republicans got a full picture of her and 80 some days for their hearings. partusan double standards? Lack of transparency?Get over what?
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
I mean documents.
Many unreleased documents were covered by executive privilege.
Why would the White House release those?
Executive priveledge wasnt cited in a demand for similar documents from Kagen. As a result the Republicans got a full picture of her and 80 some days for their hearings. partusan double standards? Lack of transparency?He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
I mean documents.
Many unreleased documents were covered by executive privilege.
Why would the White House release those?
Executive priveledge wasnt cited in a demand for similar documents from Kagen. As a result the Republicans got a full picture of her and 80 some days for their hearings. partusan double standards? Lack of transparency?He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
I mean documents.
Many unreleased documents were covered by executive privilege.
Why would the White House release those?
And, dickwad?Get over what?Calm is not the problem. The problem was the asinine shit that he did say as well as waffling all over the place about who he actually was as a kid. If he would have stood up and simply stated that he was a drinker and liked to party then I would have had respect for that. Instead he tried to play the choir boy in school and I that does not pass muster.Oddly enough, I supported him through the entire process, even her testimony, until he opened his asinine mouth. The performance that he put on in front of the committee was not something that I would support going to the bench.
Because what? You think an emotionless robot, who reacts in a completely inhuman, unnatural way to being accused of being a RAPIST, is somehow desirable? Tell me how calm YOU would have been in the same position.
Btw, anyone who thinks judges don't routinely get pissy, bad-tempered, and downright angry has never actually met a judge, and is talking out of his ass.
Also, the BS he was pulling with the call for the FBI investigation was BS as well. He should have simply stated no because the extra time dragging his name through the mud. What is so hard about simply stating the truth rather than avoiding the question entirely.
Either you want a fighter or you don't but Kav did not display that he was a fighter there like many on the right are stating - all I seen was someone acting like the traditional lying politician. I don't want another politician on the court - I want someone that is straight forward and that I think will fight for what is RIGHT rather than play word games to pander. I got NOTHING of that from his statements. i would have preferred him to just tell the committee that he was not going to play ball because he felt it was a character assassination attempt and then answered no questions at all. At least then he would not have come off as a slimy politician.
Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
It is the new normal.Get over what?Ummmmmm, a Supreme Court Justice has no reason to be “a fighter”
Seriously, get over it.
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
It is the new normal.Get over what?
That is the defense of Kav, that he was a fighter. Clearly he was not.
He won dickwad. But again, Justices are not placed to fight.
Nor should they be campaigned for and against by donor money...that rather bothers me. As did his contemptuous attitude towards Congress and their questions prior to letter coming out, the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see, all left a very bad taste in the way the process was conducted before it got dirty.
Justices don’t win. They don’t lose. It is not how it should be viewed imo.
the rushed process, and the refusal to releases documents Congress had a right to see
You mean the documents covered by executive privilege?
I mean documents. Similar were released for Kagen and not at the last minute so there was no time to read them. Pretty dirty.
Why release any documents at all anymore? The ONLY thing those documents are used for is to justify already held positions. The idea is that those documents are supposed to be part of the decision process. That has not really been true for awhile now though.
