Vance puts Walz on notice regarding Billions in welfare fraud In Minnesota….referral to DOJ

[Independent thinker]

what I am saying is that regardless of their politics (lefty or righty) many people are corrupt and want to scam/fraud people to put money in their pockets! Duh!

You didn't know that? Oh, sorry, your bias prevents you from seeing anything different to what you believe! I forgot.

I'm not the one making biased threads on here day after day after day. That would be YOU.

 

[Lockback]

Of course not. He will have a blue jury in a blue city in a blue state. And, he's a nice old man.

Exactly.
Oh yes. The "justice" system is totally broken. At least in blue cities.

 

[Luckyone]

I'm not the one making biased threads on here day after day after day. That would be YOU.

You mean that all the data, statistics, and facts that I present in every one of my OP's is biased?

Wow, your post is even further on the biased scale that I could ever imagine

 

[Frankeneinstein]

do you think Walz will be convicted?

not the point of lawfare [just a side benefit if it occurs] see: "watergate"...it's to tie up your political opponent in court in the hopes it drives or keeps him/her/they from office.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

who are you talking to con.man from Ga.?

depends on the judge..."hey guys" watch this contortion

Z

Of course not. He will have a blue jury in a blue city in a blue state. And, he's a nice old man

Of course not. He will have a blue jury in a blue city in a blue state. And, he's a nice old man.

Ha ha. I called it. This one folded in a heartbeat. He knows he’s just spreading bullshit on a message board so he saves himself from the embarrassment of yet another DOJ #fail. And that is after telling us that Blanche was the real deal and now we would see the dominoes start to fall.

 

[Lockback]

Ha ha. I called it. This one folded in a heartbeat. He knows he’s just spreading bullshit on a message board so he saves himself from the embarrassment of yet another DOJ #fail. And that is after telling us that Blanche was the real deal and now we would see the dominoes start to fall.

Laugh while you can, Fake Screen Name. The Big Payback is just starting.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Z

"HEY GUYS" ^here^ is the proper acceptable response to con.mans question for "independent thinker"

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

not the point of lawfare [just a side benefit if it occurs] see: "watergate"...it's to tie up your political opponent in court in the hopes it drives or keeps him/her/they from office.

Haha. Second one to fold. Dependent Thinker use the excuse that it’s gonna be a blue jury and therefore Walz will not be convicted
Now this other troll tells us that you see, Walz is actually not guilty but the point of charging him is to…keep him out of office or something.

After hyping a referral by a Trumper,, they drop one by one admitting this ain’t going anywhere. All I have to do is remind them that the courts are not a conservative message board.

 

[Independent thinker]

You mean that all the data, statistics, and facts that I present in every one of my OP's is biased?

Wow, your post is even further on the biased scale that I could ever imagine

View attachment 1267288

Well, you just admitted you were guessing about the future. "What analysts say". You know darned well that every financial statement is backed with an asterisk and fine print, warning you that you can't depend on what analysts say.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Laugh while you can, Fake Screen Name. The Big Payback is just starting.

Well, one out of three trolls thinking Walz will be convicted isn’t so bad. I’ll ask you for conviction updates periodically if you don’t mind.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

I'll get excited when someone is put behind bars. BTW, when do they begin prosecuting Walz and the mayor of Minneapolis for the illegal and orchestrated effort to release private license plate info and other sensitive data about who, where and when ICE agents would be so that mobs of idiots like Good and Pretti could stalk them and be waiting for them to interfere in an arrest?

Note the hedge.
Toobfreak knows Walz won’t be convicted so he says he’ll be excited when “someone”. Not Walz, “someone” goes to jail.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Haha. Second one to fold. Dependent Thinker use the excuse that it’s gonna be a blue jury and therefore Walz will not be convicted
Now this other troll tells us that you see, Walz is actually not guilty but the point of charging him is to…keep him out of office or something.

After typing a referral,, they drop one by one admitting this ain’t going anywhere. All I have to do is remind them that the courts are not a conservative message board.

"HEY GUYS" like clockwork

 

[struth]

Well, one out of three trolls thinking Walz will be convicted isn’t so bad. I’ll ask you for conviction updates periodically if you don’t mind.

Geez man, convicted? This isn't some Xiden style political prosecution....this is a real criminal investigation. Let's see what it uncovers before we start talking convictions.

You demafascist really have lost your way

 

[WEATHER53]

You mean that all the data, statistics, and facts that I present in every one of my OP's is biased?

Wow, your post is even further on the biased scale that I could ever imagine

View attachment 1267288

The Al Gore chart

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Geez man, convicted? This isn't some Xiden style political prosecution....this is a real criminal investigation. Let's see what it uncovers before we start talking convictions.

You demafascist really have lost your way

Another shy guy hitting the brakes because he knows Tim Walz will not be convicted.

 

[struth]

Another shy guy hitting the brakes because he knows Tim Walz will not be convicted.

Sorry, I prefer actually following the rule of law, and not political prosecutions.

I get that's weird to a demafascsit.

 

[MarathonMike]

JD Vance refers evidence of Minnesota fraud, Walz inaction to DOJ for criminal inquiry

Vance announced criminal referral in a social media post in which he raised concerns that Walz's administration tried to retaliate against whistleblowers.

justthenews.com

Vice President JD Vance has referred evidence gathered by Congress that Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison failed to act against mass welfare fraud in their state to the Justice Department for possible criminal investigate.

Vance announced the criminal referral in a social media post late Monday in which he raised concerns that Walz's administration also tried to retaliate against state workers who blew the whistle on the welfare fraud scams in Minnesota, estimated by the House Oversight Committee to have cost taxpayers more than $9 billion.
.
.
.
Clearly Walz, Ellison, and Omar knew about THE BILLIONS IN FRAUD but chose to ignore it, OR MAYBE EVEN BENEFIT FROM IT.

BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF TAXPAYER MONEY STOLEN.

Good test for communists….let us pretend this happened in Florida….then you would not be ignoring it.

We'll see if Walz tries to use his "Sometimes I'm just a knucklehead" defense.

 

[Lockback]

Well, one out of three trolls thinking Walz will be convicted isn’t so bad. I’ll ask you for conviction updates periodically if you don’t mind.

I don't count on convictions because your Soviet party is in control of that state.
Your party is completely corrupt and you're part of it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

No corruption I see because I am a communist.

 

[Luckyone]

Well, you just admitted you were guessing about the future. "What analysts say". You know darned well that every financial statement is backed with an asterisk and fine print, warning you that you can't depend on what analysts say.

You truly are blind-by-choice.

Everything everyone does in the stock market is "guessing about the future" because NOTHING is a sure thing. Nonetheless and in having been looking at charts over 47 years, there are things that CONSISTENTLY stand out and are repeated over and over again that have more meaning than others.

What I do (and everyone else as well) is go with the probabilities. This is NOT about being right or wrong but about being right more often than wrong.

What is so hard about that way of common sense thinking that it does not enter your brain?