Uvalde shooter legally bought his guns............

[bigrebnc1775]

Yet again numpt, nope. No one is a subject of the Crown, the Crown Estate answers to Parliament and it's yearly profits go to the treasury. Schooled again kid.

Sure thing as you bow kissing the asshole of the queen.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Sure thing as you bow kissing the asshole of the queen.

And you lick your presidents ring piece.

 

[Dagosa]

And if you believe that then it would apply to ALL amendments including the first therefore no electronic media would be protected under the free speech provision,

Wrong, because the constitutions does not refer to any particular mode of communications…it does with the 2a. It specifically says “arms”. It’s your choice. You can’t have it both ways.

 

[Dagosa]

Sure thing as you bow kissing the asshole of the queen.

You appear to be pretty ignorant of governance in UK, as you are in the US of A.

 

[Dagosa]

When this response is all you have, you know you're getting your ass kicked.

I can see you’re conceding. Emojis are a sure sign you have nothing honest or worthwhile to say.

 

[Dagosa]

Just using your "logic" applied to the First Amendment

“Logic“ is code in the Trump world for, you’re just effin guessing and groping at straws.

 

[Dagosa]

And if you believe that then it would apply to ALL amendments including the first therefore no electronic media would be protected under the free speech provision,

Wrong. “Arms” is a term used in the constitution is clearly defined and enumerated upon by subsequent rulings.
AAMOF, Heller clearly lays down a framework of restrictions for only those persons who are qualified. There VERY FEW persons who can legally posses a handgun in DC.. Any state is allowed to do exactly what DC does to this day.



The modes of communication by the press or anyone expressing himself is mearly restricted to non violence and on or in a public way by the SC. The modes by SC rulings clearly are not restricted. So your comments are irrelevant.

 

[Blues Man]

Wrong, because the constitutions does not refer to any particular mode of communications…it does with the 2a. It specifically says “arms”. It’s your choice. You can’t have it both ways.

There is no specific type of arm mentioned in the Second Amendment

Arms can mean swords, rifles, handguns, canon etc. The second does not say muskets

 

[Blues Man]

There is no specific type of arm mentioned in the Second Amendment

“Logic“ is code in the Trump world for, you’re just effin guessing and groping at straws.

FYI I didn't vote for Trump.

Personally I think he's a fucking idiot just like you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And you lick your presidents ring piece.

That bastard? I wouldn't piss on him to put out the fire if he was on fire.