Monk-Eye
Gold Member
- Feb 3, 2018
- 3,219
- 783
- 140
" Scope Of Claims "
* Contingencies Of Descriptors *
* Principle In Need Of Qualified Language *
* A Political Debate Post Viability But Not Prior To Viability *
* Contingencies Of Descriptors *
By such an argument , a viability policy is no longer a sufficient standard justifying proscription of abortion by a state because performing a c section to deliver alive would not produce an equal outcome , thereby implying that a state would need to apply an equal outcome standard for it to proscribe abortion .If the day comes when such a procedure is equal outcomes to the natural process, that would be a viable policy.
* Principle In Need Of Qualified Language *
Such a supposition be true post viability , but prior to viability the supposition is false and mute .Right now though, my point is that the PRINCIPLE of restricting abortions is accepted even by playtime. The question is one of judgement, and balancing benefit/cost and conflicting needs and interests.
* A Political Debate Post Viability But Not Prior To Viability *
Whether it is a rigid standard or parturition or whether it is a less rigid standard of viability , the constitution specifies birth as requirement for equal protection and that has everything to do with non enumerated wrights of an individual under us 9th amendment versus state wrights under us 10th amendment .It is a valid political debate, not a matter of "rights" vs government oppression, as playtime and her ilk like to pretend.