Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When Wall Street banks borrow from the Fed at less than 1% rates and then loan those funds to consumers at 27%, I'm more concerned with restoring some semblance of consumer protection than with transfer balance fees.Let's look at financial transactions. What transactions do you speak of? Last time DumBama messed with that, he created policy that credit card companies could no longer lay heavy fines and increased interest rates for their Democrat.....
What are you talking about? My argument is about equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States.So, with the destruction of "at will" employment
You simply need to manage your money better. And, "payment in kind" is not mere money.Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the lawswhat is ".....EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS...." ?????
Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
What are you talking about? My argument is about equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States.So, with the destruction of "at will" employment
You simply need to manage your money better. And, "payment in kind" is not mere money.Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
When Wall Street banks borrow from the Fed at less than 1% rates and then loan those funds to consumers at 27%, I'm more concerned with restoring some semblance of consumer protection than with transfer balance fees.Let's look at financial transactions. What transactions do you speak of? Last time DumBama messed with that, he created policy that credit card companies could no longer lay heavy fines and increased interest rates for their Democrat.....
Citigroup Has Made a Sap of the Fed: It’s Borrowing at 0.35 % from the Fed While Charging Struggling Consumers 27.4 % on Credit Cards
Employment is at the will of either party. The State has no authority to deny or disparage our privileges and immunities for unemployment compensation through unequal protection of the law.Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
can you expand on your objection to my statement,
D. Palos?
Employment at-will laws.What are you talking about? My argument is about equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States.So, with the destruction of "at will" employment
What laws do you feel are being enforced unequally?
You are merely quibbling under Capitalism.You simply need to manage your money better. And, "payment in kind" is not mere money.Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
the secret to non-poverty is not actually "money management" ------it is LIFE-STYLE MANAGEMENT
A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the lawswhat is ".....EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS...." ?????
Quite obviously, you are not using that technology to actually further your education on the subject of economics. If anything, you are finding videos and articles that confirm your bias, but are not learning. While you're at it, the defense mandate must cover any given contingency in a top down and bottom up manner, which naturally gives the government the green light to do whatever it wants with our military, including using it to fight illegal drug use.I thank goodness for modern broadband times and videos on the subjects I want to learn more about. All you have is fallacy not any valid arguments.I've lectured you on economics on dozens of occasions. University of Phoenix used to pay me to lecture morons like you on basic economic principles, no one pays me to educate your ignorant ass so I shan't bother.
And, our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner, we also have a Commerce Clause and even a central bank, what else is there to know under our form of Capitalism?
A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the lawsA person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the lawswhat is ".....EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS...." ?????
oh---you mean "equal protection under the law"-----yes----VERY IMPORTANT------have you ever been to court on a life, liberty, or property question. I have.
THEIR AIN'T NONE (the 'equal' thing) Court decisions regarding "life, liberty, property" are
POLITICAL in my town-----increasingly.
Daniel believes that he's not getting equal protection under the law because Unemployment Compensation doesn't cover people who simply refuse to work a job. He thinks the word "Unemployment" means unemployed for any reason at all. And you will never convince him otherwise.A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the lawswhat is ".....EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS...." ?????
oh---you mean "equal protection under the law"-----yes----VERY IMPORTANT------have you ever been to court on a life, liberty, or property question. I have.
THEIR AIN'T NONE (the 'equal' thing) Court decisions regarding "life, liberty, property" are
POLITICAL in my town-----increasingly.
I resort to the fewest fallacies. So obviously, you have nothing but projection on your part.Quite obviously, you are not using that technology to actually further your education on the subject of economics. If anything, you are finding videos and articles that confirm your bias, but are not learning. While you're at it, the defense mandate must cover any given contingency in a top down and bottom up manner, which naturally gives the government the green light to do whatever it wants with our military, including using it to fight illegal drug use.I thank goodness for modern broadband times and videos on the subjects I want to learn more about. All you have is fallacy not any valid arguments.I've lectured you on economics on dozens of occasions. University of Phoenix used to pay me to lecture morons like you on basic economic principles, no one pays me to educate your ignorant ass so I shan't bother.
And, our welfare clause is General and must cover any given contingency in a top down manner, we also have a Commerce Clause and even a central bank, what else is there to know under our form of Capitalism?
IOW, you don't get to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution you promote and which you ignore.
Yes, Daniel, the state absolutely has that authority because the State owes you nothing.Employment is at the will of either party. The State has no authority to deny or disparage our privileges and immunities for unemployment compensation through unequal protection of the law.Poverty which can be solved with mere money. Means tested welfare should be for those for whom mere money, may not be enough.can you define "simple poverty"?
so true-----mere money is almost never ENOUGH.
INFLATED minimum wage is MERE MONEY.
Freebee food is also MERE MONEY
can you expand on your objection to my statement,
D. Palos?
Not where I live.You can very easily.... EASILY live a 1960s life style on minimum wage today.
As I recall, in 1967 the California minimum wage was $1.75 a hour; my rent was $75 a month in Santa Monica which was (and is) a relatively high rent area. My car was 7 years old, and a single minimum wage job allowed me to pay it off and maintain it. I haven't been able to afford a car since 1993. My home technology was limited to a landline and a radio. Today in California the minimum wage is $12 an hour, and it would barely cover the market rent on any apartment similar to the one I lived in half-a-century ago.
Right, but you are in a socialist hell hole. Yeah, in California you can't live on nearly anything.
But that is because you voted for socialists idiots that ruined your cities.
You, and those like you, voted for socialism in California, through controls and regulations.
You screwed yourself.
This is why I'm entirely against government bailing out California. You did this to yourself.
Here is the the problem:
People being able to afford our first world economy means more people able to afford housing costs and more builders being able to build or upgrade more housing. What do landlords believe the minimum wage should be?
328 million Americans * $1,000/month = $328 billion/month.
$328 billion/month * 12 months = $3.9 trillion/year.
Fun times indeed. Where is the almost $4 trillion going to come from, Bill Gates?
That's McConnell's response that kills the whole thing.
