Understanding The Politics of The Nazis…

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
…and of the Fascists, Communists, Liberals or Progressives.



1.The preeminent Progressive, Woodrow Wilson, wrote in an 1890 essay “Leaders of Men,” “Resistance is left to the minority. And such as will not be convinced are crushed.”

The philosophical understanding that rights are created by political power requires a government with nearly unlimited power effect those rights, a government with the power to “crush” those who stand in the way of “progress.” Upon this foundation, this philosophical understanding of power, is built the left-wing penchant for violence.

Herein we find the echo of the Progressives’ inspiration, Hegel, who said of a leader: “But so mighty a form must trample down many an innocent flower or crush to pieces many an object in its path.”
This is the doctrine of Nazis….and of Progressvies.


These are your politics if you vote Democrat.


2.If you are a Progressive, a Modern Liberal, a Communist or a Democrat, your views come not from England, but from Germany, from Hegel, Marx and Nazi Germany. The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives….from Locke, the island nation, Britain.

By late 19th century, the political theories of Germany had insinuated its way into academia, and the majority of early Presidents, most of whom were taught by German-influenced tutors and teachers. Neither Theodore Roosevelt nor Woodrow Wilson felt wedded to the Constitution, or to the individual over the collective. Germanic concepts.



3. “[Democrat racist Woodrow] Wilson was the first President to criticize the American founding, which he did with a root-and-branch thoroughness. Few people nowadays recognize the radicalism of the Wilsonian and progressive repudiation of the Founder’s project. For progressives then and now, moving up from the Founder’s cramped, premodern, and unscientific vision of political possibilities is central to the very definition of progress.”
George Will, “The Conservative Sensibility,” p.68





4. Due to the binary nature of our political system, there are only two parties that have a chance to win national election. The choice is always to pick the one closest to the constellation of one’s political beliefs and wishes.

Woodrow Wilson, as the consummate Progressive, you can choose either Wilson or Teddy Roosevelt as the first, but Wilson made his loathing of the Founders most clear, and here are his problems with those who founded this nation:

The Founders claimed universality for their most basic principles.

Wilson claimed that there are no self-evident rights for American citizens.

The Founders: all men are equally endowed with certain inalienable rights.

For Wilson, we have only the rights that government decides to give us, and they can be withdrawn.

For the Founders, government’s function is to secure and maintain those rights.

For the Founders, the power of government is based on the consent of the governed.

The powers of government are spelled out in the Constitution, a fixes document and the only one the people have consented to be governed by.

For Progressives, the Constitution is a ‘living’ document, that changes with the times, or when government says it does.

For the Founders, human nature was set and immutable.

For Wilson and the Progressives, it can and must be made plastic and malleable.





5. It is clear which party is closer to the views of the Founders, and which is closer to Wilson and Progressives, and the Nazis.

It is up to thinking individuals to make the determination as to which system of beliefs they find closer to their clearly thought out views. Of course, as a government school grad, you may simply be more comfortable following order than thinking about the agenda behind those orders.
 
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.

Then the rest of the OP is just a morass of confused ramblings. For the founders human nature was “set and immutable” and for progressives “plastic” and malleable”writes the OP.

That is is just psychobabble from someone with way too much time on their hands.
 
Last edited:
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.
What spectrum?

To the right of what?

To use a scale, the scale has to be measuring something, so what is being measured to put the National Socialists to the right of something?
 
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.


1. "Fascism is right-wing"
Of course it isn't; that the cover story they feed you in government school.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism




3. "Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

Now, watch me ram the truth down your ignorant throat:

Teddy Roosevelt gave a speech, “Who is a Progressive,” in 1912. This, from the speech: “…stand for the forward movement, the men who stand for the uplift and betterment of mankind,… We of to-day who stand for the Progressive movement here in the United States are not wedded to any particular kind of machinery, save solely as means to the end desired.” http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1199

a. Does this sound like one who values the Constitution, which enumerates the way things are to be done, rather than what is to be done? And Teddy explains that Progressives care not about the means, as long as his ‘ends’ are accomplished.


And his view of the Constitution? ‘Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!" Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands."’ 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (p. 139) see 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask, by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. | David Gordon



Bet that put a cork in your ignorant pie hole.
 
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.

Then the rest of the OP is just a morass of confused ramblings. For the founders human nature was “set and immutable” and for progressives “plastic” and malleable”writes the OP.

That is is just psychobabble from someone with way too much time on their hands.



Here's another spanking you deserve:


"The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, "


Let's compare their programs:

Workers Welfare Programs:

In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.

a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.

b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.

c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.

d) 5 day week.

e) Free Public Health.

f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.

g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools

h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.




and....

During the 12 years of Hitler’s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia


The very same socialists that you are.

Do I say 'good day,' or would you prefer Sieg Heil?
 
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.


1. "Fascism is right-wing"
Of course it isn't; that the cover story they feed you in government school.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism




3. "Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

Now, watch me ram the truth down your ignorant throat:

Teddy Roosevelt gave a speech, “Who is a Progressive,” in 1912. This, from the speech: “…stand for the forward movement, the men who stand for the uplift and betterment of mankind,… We of to-day who stand for the Progressive movement here in the United States are not wedded to any particular kind of machinery, save solely as means to the end desired.” http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1199

a. Does this sound like one who values the Constitution, which enumerates the way things are to be done, rather than what is to be done? And Teddy explains that Progressives care not about the means, as long as his ‘ends’ are accomplished.


And his view of the Constitution? ‘Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!" Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands."’ 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (p. 139) see 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask, by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. | David Gordon



Bet that put a cork in your ignorant pie hole.
Just more tripe and garbage from someone who just takes snippets of quotes puts them together without understanding what the hell she is talking about.

First of all Nazism did not believe in the collective. Nazism was a nationalist ideology. If they were left wing they would not have sent all their socialist and Communists and other left-wing opponents of theirs to the gas chambers.

Second, your second statement just shows even greater stupidity. American progressives did not disavow fascism until after the Holocaust was found out? That statement is just utterly ignorant. Who waged the war against the Nazis? It was FDR. Those who opposed going to war with the Nazis were right-wingers like Henry Ford.

Third, TR was a progressive but your analysis of progressiveness is so skewed it amounts to nothing more than babble. As I said you use snippets of other people’s work and link them together in an incoherent mess.
 
Last edited:
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.


1. "Fascism is right-wing"
Of course it isn't; that the cover story they feed you in government school.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism




3. "Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

Now, watch me ram the truth down your ignorant throat:

Teddy Roosevelt gave a speech, “Who is a Progressive,” in 1912. This, from the speech: “…stand for the forward movement, the men who stand for the uplift and betterment of mankind,… We of to-day who stand for the Progressive movement here in the United States are not wedded to any particular kind of machinery, save solely as means to the end desired.” http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1199

a. Does this sound like one who values the Constitution, which enumerates the way things are to be done, rather than what is to be done? And Teddy explains that Progressives care not about the means, as long as his ‘ends’ are accomplished.


And his view of the Constitution? ‘Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!" Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands."’ 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (p. 139) see 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask, by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. | David Gordon



Bet that put a cork in your ignorant pie hole.
Just more tripe and garbage from someone who just takes snippets of quotes puts them together without understanding what the hell she is talking about.

First of all Nazism did not believe in the collective. Nazism was a nationalist ideology. If they were left wing they would not have sent all their socialist and Communists and other left-wing opponents of theirs to the gas chambers.

Second, your second statement just shows even greater stupidity. American progressives did not disavow fascism until after the Holocaust was found out. That statement is just utterly ignorant. Who waged the war against the Nazis? It was FDR. Those who opposed going to war with the Nazis were right-wingers like Henry Ford.

Third, TR was a progressive but your analysis of progressiveness is so skewed it amonts to nothing more than babble. As I said you use snippets of other people’s work and link them together in an incoherent mess.



Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

You are simply a government school ignoramus who is fearful of not agreeing with everything your masters demand you believe.


Grow a spine and face facts: you've been convinced to agree to the same views as Nazis and Bolsheviks.


And, you're hopeless.
 
Democrats defeated the Nazis

Conservative Americans, like PC support Hitler
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JLW
Fascism is right-wing For starters. Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

The definition of tripe is making comparisons to Democrats and Nazis, especially when Nazis are on the right-wing of the spectrum.


1. "Fascism is right-wing"
Of course it isn't; that the cover story they feed you in government school.

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.



2. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism. “Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism




3. "Stating that Theodore Roosevelt did not feel “wedded to the Constitution”” has to be the among the most inane comments I have read.

Now, watch me ram the truth down your ignorant throat:

Teddy Roosevelt gave a speech, “Who is a Progressive,” in 1912. This, from the speech: “…stand for the forward movement, the men who stand for the uplift and betterment of mankind,… We of to-day who stand for the Progressive movement here in the United States are not wedded to any particular kind of machinery, save solely as means to the end desired.” http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1199

a. Does this sound like one who values the Constitution, which enumerates the way things are to be done, rather than what is to be done? And Teddy explains that Progressives care not about the means, as long as his ‘ends’ are accomplished.


And his view of the Constitution? ‘Well known is TR's outburst, when told the Constitution did not permit the confiscation of private property: "To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!" Less well known is that at one point TR summoned General John M. Schofield, instructing him: "I bid you pay no heed to any other authority, no heed to a writ from a judge, or anything else except my commands."’ 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask. By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (p. 139) see 33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask, by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. | David Gordon



Bet that put a cork in your ignorant pie hole.
Just more tripe and garbage from someone who just takes snippets of quotes puts them together without understanding what the hell she is talking about.

First of all Nazism did not believe in the collective. Nazism was a nationalist ideology. If they were left wing they would not have sent all their socialist and Communists and other left-wing opponents of theirs to the gas chambers.

Second, your second statement just shows even greater stupidity. American progressives did not disavow fascism until after the Holocaust was found out. That statement is just utterly ignorant. Who waged the war against the Nazis? It was FDR. Those who opposed going to war with the Nazis were right-wingers like Henry Ford.

Third, TR was a progressive but your analysis of progressiveness is so skewed it amonts to nothing more than babble. As I said you use snippets of other people’s work and link them together in an incoherent mess.



Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

You are simply a government school ignoramus who is fearful of not agreeing with everything your masters demand you believe.


Grow a spine and face facts: you've been convinced to agree to the same views as Nazis and Bolsheviks.


And, you're hopeless.
No, you have engaged in babble and illogic. Even you last statement linking Nazis and Bolsheviks just shows that your knowledge of political theory is spurious and weak. Take a class In political science 101 then come back to me.
 
America was created with great respect for the individual.
Not so with the collectivist disciplines.
Note how Democrat Progressive Woodrow Wilson.....it seems redundant to say 'Democrat' and 'racist'......viewed his citizens, versus the Führer ....er, 'Leader.'


6. “Men are like clay, to be molded, having no such fixed human nature, as the Founders believed.”

In his 1890 essay, “Leaders of Men,” Wilson explained that a “true leader” uses the masses like “tools.” He must inflame their passions with little heed for the facts. “Men are as clay in the hands of the consummate leader.” “No doubt a lot of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle,” wrote Wilson, attacking the very individual rights that have made America great. He rejected the principles of “separation of powers” and “checks and balances” that are the foundation of American government: “Government does now whatever experience permits or the times demand….” wrote Wilson in The State.

And the Constitution should be tossed away, as the brilliant and beneficent leaders need no instructions nor restrictions:

Justly revered as our great Constitution is, it could be stripped off and thrown aside like a garment, and the nation would still stand forth in the living vestment of flesh and sinew, warm with the heart-blood of one people, ready to recreate constitutions and laws. … Woodrow Wilson [Woodrow Wilson
"The Modern Democratic State" (1885; first published in 1966)
The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, Volume 5]

Every year, Wilson said, new constitutions should be written ‘afresh.’



In a different time, he might have said “I don’t need a Constitution when I have a pen and a phone.”
 
…and of the Fascists, Communists, Liberals or Progressives.



1.The preeminent Progressive, Woodrow Wilson, wrote in an 1890 essay “Leaders of Men,” “Resistance is left to the minority. And such as will not be convinced are crushed.”

The philosophical understanding that rights are created by political power requires a government with nearly unlimited power effect those rights, a government with the power to “crush” those who stand in the way of “progress.” Upon this foundation, this philosophical understanding of power, is built the left-wing penchant for violence.

Herein we find the echo of the Progressives’ inspiration, Hegel, who said of a leader: “But so mighty a form must trample down many an innocent flower or crush to pieces many an object in its path.”
This is the doctrine of Nazis….and of Progressvies.


These are your politics if you vote Democrat.


2.If you are a Progressive, a Modern Liberal, a Communist or a Democrat, your views come not from England, but from Germany, from Hegel, Marx and Nazi Germany. The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives….from Locke, the island nation, Britain.

By late 19th century, the political theories of Germany had insinuated its way into academia, and the majority of early Presidents, most of whom were taught by German-influenced tutors and teachers. Neither Theodore Roosevelt nor Woodrow Wilson felt wedded to the Constitution, or to the individual over the collective. Germanic concepts.



3. “[Democrat racist Woodrow] Wilson was the first President to criticize the American founding, which he did with a root-and-branch thoroughness. Few people nowadays recognize the radicalism of the Wilsonian and progressive repudiation of the Founder’s project. For progressives then and now, moving up from the Founder’s cramped, premodern, and unscientific vision of political possibilities is central to the very definition of progress.”
George Will, “The Conservative Sensibility,” p.68





4. Due to the binary nature of our political system, there are only two parties that have a chance to win national election. The choice is always to pick the one closest to the constellation of one’s political beliefs and wishes.

Woodrow Wilson, as the consummate Progressive, you can choose either Wilson or Teddy Roosevelt as the first, but Wilson made his loathing of the Founders most clear, and here are his problems with those who founded this nation:

The Founders claimed universality for their most basic principles.

Wilson claimed that there are no self-evident rights for American citizens.

The Founders: all men are equally endowed with certain inalienable rights.

For Wilson, we have only the rights that government decides to give us, and they can be withdrawn.

For the Founders, government’s function is to secure and maintain those rights.

For the Founders, the power of government is based on the consent of the governed.

The powers of government are spelled out in the Constitution, a fixes document and the only one the people have consented to be governed by.

For Progressives, the Constitution is a ‘living’ document, that changes with the times, or when government says it does.

For the Founders, human nature was set and immutable.

For Wilson and the Progressives, it can and must be made plastic and malleable.





5. It is clear which party is closer to the views of the Founders, and which is closer to Wilson and Progressives, and the Nazis.

It is up to thinking individuals to make the determination as to which system of beliefs they find closer to their clearly thought out views. Of course, as a government school grad, you may simply be more comfortable following order than thinking about the agenda behind those orders.
Thanks for yet ANOTHER fantastic post, PC. Nicely done.
 
7. If you are a Progressive, you can never refer to the Declaration of Independence in a positive way.

“Wilson therefore sought a reinterpretation of the Founding—a reinterpretation grounded in historical contingency. To the Founding’s ahistorical notion that government is rooted in an understanding of unchanging human nature, Wilson opposed the historical argument that the ends, scope, and role of just government must be defined by the different principles of different epochs and that, therefore, it is impossible to speak of a single form of just government for all ages.

This was a self-conscious reinterpretation, as [Democrat Progressive] Wilson even suggested that the Declaration ought to be understood by excluding from it the foundational statements on equality and natural rights contained in its first two paragraphs.

In a 1911 address, Wilson remarked that “the rhetorical introduction of the Declaration of Independence is the least part of it…. If you want to understand the real Declaration of Independence, do not repeat the preface.” The Heritage Foundation



This is what Woodrow Wilson refused to respect:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.


Today’s Democrat Party is closer to Lee Harvey Oswald, than to John F. Kennedy.
 
8. Where did Wilson, and the Progressive vision, originate. Certainly not in America, and not with the men who founded this nation.



“The influence of German political philosophy is evident not only from looking at the ideas espoused by progressives, but also from the historical pedigree of the most influential progressive thinkers. Almost all of them were either educated in Germany in the nineteenth century or had as teachers those who were. This fact reflects the sea of change that had occurred in American higher education in the second half of the nineteenth century, a time when most Americans who wanted an advanced degree went to Europe to get one.

By 1900, the faculties of American colleges and universities had become populated with European PhDs, and the historical thinking that dominated Europe (especially Germany) in the nineteenth century came to permeate American higher education. Johns Hopkins University, founded in 1876, was established for the express reason of bringing the German educational model to the United States, and produced several prominent progressives, including Wilson…” American Progressivism | Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism



Among other things, American progressives took from the Germans (and especially from the German philosopher G. W. F. Hegel and his disciples) their critique of natural law, individual rights, and social compact theory, and their organic or “living” notion of the national state."
Ibid.


The attitude of Hegel in the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”

From a speech delivered on the Senate floor

May 14, 1943
Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions
 
9. Voters have an opportunity and an obligation to understand the most basic beliefs of their party and their leaders. That is far more important than the campaign promise, nearly all of which are lies.

Contrary to recent discussion, no President has made a greater effort to ‘fundamentally transform’ America, than the spawn of George Hegel, the Democrat racist (is that redundant?) Woodrow Wilson.



Wilson saw no need for a legislative body, but rather an all powerful presidency, who saw Congress as an imposition to the efficiency of change that the great man would produce.

“The functions of government are in a very real sense independent of legislation, and even constitutions, because [they are] as old as government and inherent in its very nature. The bulk and complex minuteness of our positive law, which covers almost every case that can arise in Administration, obscures for us the fact that Administration cannot wait upon legislation, but must be given leave, or take it, to proceed without specific warrant in giving effect to the characteristic life of the State.” Wilson, "Notes for Lectures," in PWW, Vol. 7, p. 121.


He wanted the Constitution tossed and new ones written each year.



He denied any natural rights, as per the Declaration of Independence, and echoed the French Revolution’s desire to destroy any who stood in the way of the great man’s efforts to reflect the ‘general will.’

Although attributed to Rousseau, it was Diderot who gave the model for totalitarianism of reason: “We must reason about all things,” and anyone who ‘refuses to seek out the truth’ thereby renounces his human nature and “should be treated by the rest of his species as a wild beast.” So, once ‘truth’ is determined, anyone who doesn’t accept it was “either insane or wicked and morally evil.” It is not the individual who has the “ right to decide about the nature of right and wrong,” but only “the human race,” expressed as the general will.
Himmelfarb, “The Roads to Modernity,” p. 167-68

Woodrow Wilson: Resistance is left to the minority. And such as will not be convinced are crushed.”
Sound 'woke' ahead of his times.




These are the values of Progressives, Liberals, Democrats….certainly not those of America.







 
Nazi Fascism and Bolshevik communism were both far left ideologies with very little differences. ... :cool:


Absolutely!


And allies, with Staling providing the resources for Hitler up until June 21, 1941.


Hitler didn't have the supplies nor resources he needed, so August 23, 1939, Soviet Russia' Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop and Soviet leader Josef Stalin look on, while standing under a portrait of Lenin –materials to be provided in later economic agreements.

a. "1939- At the same time, Stalin helps supply the German war effort, providing the Nazi regime with oil, wood, copper, manganese ore, rubber, grain, and other resources under a trade agreement between the two nations. Stalin views the war against Germany as a conflict "between two groups of capitalist countries", saying there is "nothing wrong in their having a good fight and weakening each other." Website no longer available | Heroes and killers of the 20th century

September 1, 1939, Hitler attacked Poland....on September 17, Stalin attacks from the East. The Soviet radio transmitter in Minsk guided the Nazi bombers attacking Polish cities. Newsreel footage showed the Red Army in Nazi helmets, marching side by side with the SS. One photo shows the hammer and sickle along side the swastika.
1596730690450.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top