Understanding Brexit: "The Doom Coffin(?)!"

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
More likely these were the Sanders voters of UK. Leaving the Eurozone actually costs the "Leave" voters a bundle. A promise of the "Leave" campaign was to put the Euro funding money to social and health benefits uses directly in the UK. Possibly Brussels had to better understand where the Eurozone needed to spend more money.

That is more of Social Democracy, Sanders voter type of redistribution campaign. Lincoln freed the slaves in the USA, but provided no remedy for the economic subjugation, of the ancient arithmetic even commencing with the Moses Atrocity in Deuteronomy 23:19-20. The Euro-affluent were getting the money from somewhere, using the investment and usury arithmetic. Usury itself had likely started out beneficial--spreading around food technology, 5000 years ago. Arithmetic happened, so Code of Hammurabi allowed for a primitive Socialist solution--selling the wife and kids in slavery. That outcome was easily humanitarian. The wife and kids could be fed, clothed, housed, and put to productive civilization. There was no precise computing of the number or health of the wife in kids in the Law. There was no precise computing of the amount of indebtedness. There is likely a three-year indentured term. The arithmetic was basically nominal. Genesis One had presented a nominal scaling of the order of creation, with no count of years, minutes, hours or seconds included. There are seven "Days," not seven epochs. Even Hollywood understands about epics(?). A few dozen people can become, "A cast of thousands." The epic itself is just an epic. There is no precise computing of much of anything involved , at all(?)!

In the Code of Hammurabi, mostly anyone can surmise a caring response to an arithmetic problem, likely not much known about at the time.

Jesus exposes the Moses Atrocity in Matthew 25:14-30. The servant with the one talent cannot possibly keep up with the other two, with more talents. Usury is shown to be arithmetic, with an outcome. The Pythagorean Theorem can even be applied. In Matthew 20:1-16, an equal amount remedy is presented, noting that the remedy is not usual arithmetic--"You have made them equal unto us, who have borne the heat and slime of the day," or some such wording--probably not put in English, in the original presentation(?). That would be said, "God's Plan," since there is no such thing(?). Food supply creating usury, in God's Plan, would clearly become sin, in Israel. As for the foreign, "Go ahead and screw 'em," is right there in the Testament, likely recorded by Moses. Just weights and measures--not example nominal naming--would also be described, likely recorded by Moses. Moses was skilled in the subjugation arts of Imperial enslaving, Pharaoh, (Acts 7:22). That is the basis of much of Western faith and religion.

But see where London and Brussels went wrong(?)! Moses wasn't even there(?)! Obama-Biden-Pelosi-Reid created the "Make Work Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," just like in Matthew 20:1-16, regardless if the tax filer had worked all the year or not. The Republicans took the Christian remedy away, which is possibly of Greek invention, at any rate. Anyone can create a rectangle with basis in Matthew 20:1-16. The equal amounts are little dots from the left side to the right side, all perpendicular to both. A diagonal from the lower left to the upper right presents an ancient arithmetic. The total of the little dots can be put into tables, easily called, "The Total Credit Market," or "Total Net Debt," or "A Boat Load of Money!" When the total spills into a fifth quadrant outside the box, then repayment of credit is way more tenuous. The balance of debt against the basis personal income sources of repayment--is no longer. U. S. Total Credit easily exceeds by now, $60.0 tril.

Mostly, the Hollywood Description applies. In nominal terms, that is easily "Epic." The five quadrant geometry can also be called, "The Doom Coffin!"

Mohammed, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, and everyone else makes no notice of the arithmetic. Keynes was gay, and that math of usury now famously runs the place: "For he bade the people bend over, and await the Public Works(?)!" Mostly, the textbooks do not so-state. Jesus doesn't raise too much havoc about Moses, even.

Lots of little Brexits, may now happen--even as Sanders proceeds to the Democratic National Convention.
Conservative in Europe is still a relatively big nose, with moustache--really badly needing glasses! You never know what really might work, for Bernie(?)! Or even Hillary(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lands of Many Nations put a War Bonnet on it: Call in Great Spirit, "Seven Come Eleven!")
 
The OP is bullshit. In 2015 Britain paid over 12 billion pounds to the EU and only got back 4.5 billion pounds. That's one hell of a price tag to belong in a club.
 
"Dear Philip, Thank you for your thorough and helpful briefing on the 1996 Default of the U. S. Federal Government. Depression is certainly due. . . .Bill Clinton, February. 1992" Secretary Reich had understood a similar concept, but is likely still advising Sanders.

It is not clear how Sanders managed to come up with the concept of a federally funded aristocracy of college faculty, however. Mostly, it would have been better to get the Defense Contractors out of the federally funded, aristocracy, instead. That was the Reagan Revolution. Send all the federal deficit money to them. President George Bush One inherited the neglect of the lower income, lower and middle class. The unemployment rate was already past Mach 7.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(It take might big tom-tom to drown out many noise-makers(?)! From NRA, "A nuclear missile silo, in every front lawn! Two atomic cannon in every garage!" Amendment Two is sacred to many White Eyes, even now(?)!)
 
Last edited:
It is not true that it would be so bad for the UK to leave the European Union. You can say what you want about the EU but is not built very well for obtaining economic growth. There are simply too many problems within the union to create sustainable high growth.

Face the facts, the European Union has from 2005- 2015 (11 years) had only an average GDP growth of 0,8% annually.
Almost all developing nations in the world that are outside the EU beat this by far, even the countries in Europe.

Average annual GDP growth rate between 2005 and 2015
Australia - 2,8%
Iceland - 2,3%
New Zealand - 2%
Switzerland - 2%
Canada - 1,8%
Norway - 1,4%
The European Union - 0,8%

This is seriously bad number. Well then you might think that Germany must have had really good growh the same period. Germany had only 1,4% in annual average GDP growth in this period.
The best country of the relative rich countries in Europe in this period was Sweden that had 1,9% average GDP growth.

Being in the European union seems to be worse for economic growth than being inside. So please stop bladdering about that so many jobs will be lost.
All in all it is not true. Most likely the UK will gain being outside the EU in the long run because the EU has too many built in problems that hinders economic prosperity.

There is a good article about the problems of the European union here. Just use google translate to read the article.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top