Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 72,152
- 60,422
- 3,615
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
TWO WAYS Trump could still win
- Thread starter emilynghiem
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #22
FB post based on a Constitutional Attorney who is a professor at UM Law....
"This is going to the Supreme Court.
Where they can easily rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale.
It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is The law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi.
This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen.
So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. ...
[Remember they called] Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner.
And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed."
=============================================================================
NOTE: It should be noted that some people may argue Barrett should recuse herself from voting because Trump publicly stated specifically that he appointed her for this reason. The way Murkowski said it when she voted to confirm Barrett: she didn't agree with the process, but she didn't think that should be held against Barrett. In this case, I don't think it should be held against Trump that Barrett was appointed by him. I think her judgment could easily find for or against "mass fraud" regardless of any politics or bias. It either is proven or it is not. Only if there wasn't enough proof, and someone called it fraud anyway due to political bias that would be clearly a political conflict of interest. But it wouldn't be fair if the case truly present indisputable evidence of mass fraud, but "just because a justice was appointed by Trump" the ninth vote is eliminated and this affects the outcome. That is hurting the case due to politics, which is just as unfair as helping the case. As long as the decision can be made objectively based on uncontested evidence that is not political propaganda but digitally documented where anyone can see it was fraudulent, there should be no question of political bias affecting the case.
"This is going to the Supreme Court.
Where they can easily rule that the election is invalid due to fraud or mistakes on a country wide scale.
It will go one of two ways, either they will rule that all the unconstitutional mail in ballots will be removed and the states ordered to recount without them or they will simply rule the election is invalid due to mass voter fraud and at that point it will be sent to the congress and senate for a vote. This is where it gets good. The house/congress votes on who the President will be. It has nothing to do with what party that has power. Every State gets one vote and 30 States are held by Republicans.and 19 by Democrats. They have to vote down party lines, they have no choice due to the 12th Amendment of the Constitution and the Senate votes for the Vice President where a similar even will take place. This is The law. This is why the Democrats are so mad at Nancy Pelosi.
This will all happen in January. The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen.
So stop watching the fake news and don’t let your heart be troubled and live your life knowing this will all work out. ...
[Remember they called] Gore the President Elect for 30 days in 2000 until the courts ruled against him and declared Bush the winner.
And two people that were part of that decision was none other that new Supreme Court Justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Why do you think the Democrats tried so hard to keep them from being confirmed."
=============================================================================
NOTE: It should be noted that some people may argue Barrett should recuse herself from voting because Trump publicly stated specifically that he appointed her for this reason. The way Murkowski said it when she voted to confirm Barrett: she didn't agree with the process, but she didn't think that should be held against Barrett. In this case, I don't think it should be held against Trump that Barrett was appointed by him. I think her judgment could easily find for or against "mass fraud" regardless of any politics or bias. It either is proven or it is not. Only if there wasn't enough proof, and someone called it fraud anyway due to political bias that would be clearly a political conflict of interest. But it wouldn't be fair if the case truly present indisputable evidence of mass fraud, but "just because a justice was appointed by Trump" the ninth vote is eliminated and this affects the outcome. That is hurting the case due to politics, which is just as unfair as helping the case. As long as the decision can be made objectively based on uncontested evidence that is not political propaganda but digitally documented where anyone can see it was fraudulent, there should be no question of political bias affecting the case.
- Thread starter
- #23
IF CONTESTED STATES
SPLIT THEIR ELECTORAL VOTES because they are so close to 50/50
that the margin of error in irregularities in counting or confirming ballots,
makes that system unreliable in measuring such a narrow difference between the candidates,
(where it isn't guaranteed 100% accurate in determining if Biden or Trump has an undisputed majority),
then the Electoral Count could TIE as 269 to 269
If neither candidate received 270,
the vote goes to the House and Senate,
where each State receives 1 vote, the House
votes for President and the Senate for Vice President.
If so, we the people can petition Congress to
vote for both Biden and Trump to share duties of
executive office, in order to better represent all States
and people of All parties across America inclusively.
That way 99% of the voters will get the candidate they voted for into office,
instead of 50%.
SPLIT THEIR ELECTORAL VOTES because they are so close to 50/50
that the margin of error in irregularities in counting or confirming ballots,
makes that system unreliable in measuring such a narrow difference between the candidates,
(where it isn't guaranteed 100% accurate in determining if Biden or Trump has an undisputed majority),
then the Electoral Count could TIE as 269 to 269
If neither candidate received 270,
the vote goes to the House and Senate,
where each State receives 1 vote, the House
votes for President and the Senate for Vice President.
If so, we the people can petition Congress to
vote for both Biden and Trump to share duties of
executive office, in order to better represent all States
and people of All parties across America inclusively.
That way 99% of the voters will get the candidate they voted for into office,
instead of 50%.
| BIDEN | TRUMP | ||
| Alabama | 9 | ||
| Alaska | 3 | ||
| Arizona | 6 | 5 | CONTESTED |
| Arkansas | 6 | ||
| California | 55 | ||
| Colorado | 9 | ||
| Connecticut | 7 | ||
| Delaware | 3 | ||
| Florida | 29 | ||
| Georgia | 8 | 8 | CONTESTED |
| Hawaii | 4 | ||
| Idaho | 4 | ||
| Illinois | 20 | ||
| Indiana | 11 | ||
| Iowa | 6 | ||
| Kansas | 6 | ||
| Kentucky | 8 | ||
| Louisiana | 8 | ||
| Maine | 2 | 2 | SPLIT |
| Maryland | 10 | ||
| Massachusetts | 11 | ||
| Michigan | 8 | 8 | CONTESTED |
| Minnesota | 10 | ||
| Mississippi | 6 | ||
| Missouri | 10 | ||
| Montana | 3 | ||
| Nebraska | 1 | 4 | SPLIT |
| Nevada | 6 | ||
| New Hampshire | 4 | ||
| New Jersey | 14 | ||
| New Mexico | 5 | ||
| New York | 29 | ||
| North Carolina | 15 | ||
| North Dakota | 3 | ||
| Ohio | 18 | ||
| Oklahoma | 7 | ||
| Oregon | 7 | ||
| Pennsylvania | 10 | 10 | CONTESTED |
| Rhode Island | 4 | ||
| South Carolina | 9 | ||
| South Dakota | 3 | ||
| Tennessee | 11 | ||
| Texas | 38 | ||
| Utah | 6 | ||
| Vermont | 3 | ||
| Virginia | 13 | ||
| Washington | 12 | ||
| West Virginia | 5 | ||
| Wisconsin | 5 | 5 | CONTESTED |
| Wyoming | 3 | ||
| W DC | 3 | ||
269 | 269 |
Last edited:
1. A. First if lawsuits pending in court are enough to order contested states to throw out ballots proven illegal or invalid,
and B. the reduced vote counts is enough to change the majority winner in enough states
then C. Trump could potentially flip enough states back to his original lead or
D. prevent Biden from getting to 270
It is still possible this approach may still leave Biden with 270
because it is not likely that complainants of fraud can meet legal court standards
on proving enough ballots were fraudulent
That would be very hard to identify enough votes in enough states
to throw out enough to change the votes to where Trump has more than Biden
2. The irregularities in voting and ballots cause some other rejection
of votes or counts, where neither Trump nor Biden receive 270.
And the decision goes to the House and Senate to vote on President and Vice President.
Since every State gets their representatives to cast 1 vote,
Trump could still win that way.
Or if the Electors for any other reasons
decide to cast votes in such a way that neither Trump nor Biden receive 270,
this could still happen even if the courts don't order any states to recount or void votes
in such a way as to change the outcome and affect the Electoral Votes.
The Electors could still choose to vote in a different way
than "winner take all" with Biden slated to receive 270 votes.
Neither is likely to happen.
Biden will be sworn in as the 46th President in January.
Biden contests NC. He wins.IF CONTESTED STATES
SPLIT THEIR ELECTORAL VOTES because they so close to 50/50
that the irregularities or inaccuracies in counting or confirming ballots
make it unfair or undeterminable if Biden or Trump has a clear majority,
then the Electoral Count could TIE as 269 to 269
If neither candidate received 270,
the vote goes to the House and Senate,
where each State receives 1 vote, the House
votes for President and the Senate for Vice President.
BIDEN TRUMP Alabama Alaska Arizona CONTESTED Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia CONTESTED Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine SPLIT Maryland Massachusetts Michigan CONTESTED Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska SPLIT Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania CONTESTED Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin CONTESTED Wyoming W DC
- Banned
- #26
The Electors could still choose to vote in a different way
than "winner take all" with Biden slated to receive 270 votes.
Election is over and Biden's perform has a won battle.
The military to exalt probably tasks.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 34
- Views
- 711
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 573
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 905
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 532
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 88
- Views
- 622
- Replies
- 66
- Views
- 311
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 146
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8037
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-