Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thank you for explaining that....I thought it was pretty self explanatory.The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
There is still attempts by courts to destroy the 2nd amendment.The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
I don't think that a conservative court would be able to overturn that ruling since it has already been in place for as long as it has.
And, if they did, there would be a serious backlash against them.
Trump’s FIRST Order: Anyone Burning An American Flag To Be Charged With TREASON
BAM! Take it lefties! 5-4 advantage in supreme court more than like a 6-3 or 7-2 in the long run and this WILL come to fruition.Gitmo awaits you!
I see you have no idea what is "free speech " But then, as a leftie, I know you don't understand freedom of religion or the right to bear arms either.Kinda makes me think I want to travel to Trump Tower and burn a flag in front of it.
Free speech is protected speech, even if you don't like what people are saying.
Me? I don't care if you burn a flag in front of me, I spent 20 years in the Navy defending this country so that you could do that if you wanted.
However....................I do have the right to respond to your free speech with a bit of my own.
There is still attempts by courts to destroy the 2nd amendment.The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
I don't think that a conservative court would be able to overturn that ruling since it has already been in place for as long as it has.
And, if they did, there would be a serious backlash against them.
The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
The point the article is trying to make is, free speech is protected speech because the Supreme Court said so. Burning the flag is free speech because the Supreme Court said so.
A conservative court might not say so.
I don't think that a conservative court would be able to overturn that ruling since it has already been in place for as long as it has.
And, if they did, there would be a serious backlash against them.
Trump’s FIRST Order: Anyone Burning An American Flag To Be Charged With TREASON
BAM! Take it lefties! 5-4 advantage in supreme court more than like a 6-3 or 7-2 in the long run and this WILL come to fruition.Gitmo awaits you!
I would tend to agree with you but burning the rainbow flag, the mexican flag and even the isis flag are hate crimes and highly illegal. If I own a flag shouldn't I be able to burn it?Flags are private property.
I would tend to agree with you but burning the rainbow flag, the mexican flag and even the isis flag are hate crimes and highly illegal. If I own a flag shouldn't I be able to burn it?Flags are private property.
