Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When he speaks, he lies.Because you say so, yet you can't tell us what his lies are!
Good rule of thumb for ya sparky.
I can’t stand to hear a President lie so much.Trump, the guy you just KNOW is lying, though you just admitted you never listen to him.
And yet, whenever you are challenged to directly quote a few of the alleged lies, and prove that they are lies, you draw a blank.The OP is correct. Drumpf has not lied 20k times. ITs more like 45K times not including his life prior to endangering the public by becoming the most incompetent fuckup of a POTUS I can ever remember.
The Washington "Jimmy's" World Post says that Trump is lying every time he says we are building a new border wall. Over 900 times. They count that as hundreds of lies.According to The Washington Post fact-checker database, President Trump has told 20,000 “false and misleading” claims through July 9 of this year – an astonishing average of nearly 16 false or misleading statements a day. But that claim is bullshit.
The problem is that any cursory inspection of the Post database reveals that the idea that Trump has told 20,000 “false or misleading” statements is itself false and misleading. Vast quantities of the 20,000 are redundancies – statements, however tendentious, that Trump has repeated ad nauseum. More problematic is that thousands of statements The Washington Post labels as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication. Further, a great many of the Post’s objections to Trump’s statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really “fact checks.” [IOW, opinions and allegations]
Just to start, here’s one of Trump’s most oft-repeated “lies,” according to Washington Post fact checkers: “My job was made harder by phony witch hunts, by ‘Russia, Russia, Russia’ nonsense.” The Post dings Trump for some variation of this claim 227 times – more than 1% of Trump’s alleged untruths. Yet, the Post’s justification for why Trump is wrong to say this is pure pettifogging.
Much of it essentially consists of a defense of the probe conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller. However, the most tangible results from the Mueller investigation – criminal charges for Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort for unrelated work in Ukraine and fecklessly charging (and then quietly dropping the charges) against a bunch of Russian nationals for hacking and other dirty computer tricks – don’t come close to proving Trump colluded with Russia to steal an election.
Then there's this:
Setting aside 2016, the Post fact checker is also wading into the current election. How the Post justifies calling this Trump statement misleading is a head-scratcher: “We need security, we can't defund our police and we can't abolish the police. They want to abolish our police.” (Again, the Post’s 20,000 total falsehoods registers Trump saying some variation of this eight different times.)
According to the Post this is false because “Biden does not support ‘defunding police,’ according to the candidate and the campaign.” However, the context of the Sean Hannity interview in which Trump makes the statement in no way suggests Trump is directly referring to Biden. “They” seems to mean the Democratic Party or the left more generally.
In addition, Biden has also said he’s “absolutely” in favor of redirecting funds from the police – which is the definition many “defund the police” supporters are using. Regardless, it’s true that numerous prominent Democrats and progressive activists have come out in favor of “defunding the police,” whatever that loaded phrase is supposed to mean. A New York Times article last month, headlined “Biden Said, ‘Most Cops Are Good.’ But Progressives Want Systemic Change,” testifies to the fact this is a significant intraparty tension. (See also this other Times op-ed from a progressive activist, “Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police.”)
Opinion | Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police (Published 2020)
Because reform won’t happen.www.nytimes.com
And this:
Other allegedly misleading claims are simply insulting to readers, such as this one Trump’s been rung up for eight times: “We have tremendous African American support.” Trump exceeded expectations with his share of the African American vote in 2016. Regardless, is he supposed to call his own supporters lackluster? If this statement is “false or misleading,” what level of wishful political rhetoric is acceptable?
No, Trump Hasn't Made 20,000 'False or Misleading' Claims | RealClearPolitics
There are now 21 on-the-record denials rebutting The Atlantics bombshell alleging President Trump called American soldiers losers and suckers....www.realclearpolitics.com
And on and on. None of this is to claim that Trump has not misled or been mistaken or wrong. But so has Biden, every single day. So did Obama, "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor". But 20,000? That s pure bullshit. A false statement is not always a lie, sometimes it is a misstatement. Every politician takes liberties with the truth, all of 'em. It ain't good, but it is reality and pointing the finger at one pol alone is, well you guessed it. Bullshit.
According to The Washington Post fact-checker database, President Trump has told 20,000 “false and misleading” claims through July 9 of this year – an astonishing average of nearly 16 false or misleading statements a day. But that claim is bullshit.
The problem is that any cursory inspection of the Post database reveals that the idea that Trump has told 20,000 “false or misleading” statements is itself false and misleading. Vast quantities of the 20,000 are redundancies – statements, however tendentious, that Trump has repeated ad nauseum. More problematic is that thousands of statements The Washington Post labels as untrue or misleading are more properly considered the habitual verbal excess for a man known for his immoderate form of communication. Further, a great many of the Post’s objections to Trump’s statements amount to argumentative quibbles that aren’t really “fact checks.” [IOW, opinions and allegations]
Just to start, here’s one of Trump’s most oft-repeated “lies,” according to Washington Post fact checkers: “My job was made harder by phony witch hunts, by ‘Russia, Russia, Russia’ nonsense.” The Post dings Trump for some variation of this claim 227 times – more than 1% of Trump’s alleged untruths. Yet, the Post’s justification for why Trump is wrong to say this is pure pettifogging.
Much of it essentially consists of a defense of the probe conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller. However, the most tangible results from the Mueller investigation – criminal charges for Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort for unrelated work in Ukraine and fecklessly charging (and then quietly dropping the charges) against a bunch of Russian nationals for hacking and other dirty computer tricks – don’t come close to proving Trump colluded with Russia to steal an election.
Then there's this:
Setting aside 2016, the Post fact checker is also wading into the current election. How the Post justifies calling this Trump statement misleading is a head-scratcher: “We need security, we can't defund our police and we can't abolish the police. They want to abolish our police.” (Again, the Post’s 20,000 total falsehoods registers Trump saying some variation of this eight different times.)
According to the Post this is false because “Biden does not support ‘defunding police,’ according to the candidate and the campaign.” However, the context of the Sean Hannity interview in which Trump makes the statement in no way suggests Trump is directly referring to Biden. “They” seems to mean the Democratic Party or the left more generally.
In addition, Biden has also said he’s “absolutely” in favor of redirecting funds from the police – which is the definition many “defund the police” supporters are using. Regardless, it’s true that numerous prominent Democrats and progressive activists have come out in favor of “defunding the police,” whatever that loaded phrase is supposed to mean. A New York Times article last month, headlined “Biden Said, ‘Most Cops Are Good.’ But Progressives Want Systemic Change,” testifies to the fact this is a significant intraparty tension. (See also this other Times op-ed from a progressive activist, “Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police.”)
Opinion | Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police (Published 2020)
Because reform won’t happen.
And this:
Other allegedly misleading claims are simply insulting to readers, such as this one Trump’s been rung up for eight times: “We have tremendous African American support.” Trump exceeded expectations with his share of the African American vote in 2016. Regardless, is he supposed to call his own supporters lackluster? If this statement is “false or misleading,” what level of wishful political rhetoric is acceptable?
No, Trump Hasn't Made 20,000 'False or Misleading' Claims | RealClearPolitics
There are now 21 on-the-record denials rebutting The Atlantics bombshell alleging President Trump called American soldiers losers and suckers....
And on and on. None of this is to claim that Trump has not misled or been mistaken or wrong. But so has Biden, every single day. So did Obama, "if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor". But 20,000? That s pure bullshit. A false statement is not always a lie, sometimes it is a misstatement. Every politician takes liberties with the truth, all of 'em. It ain't good, but it is reality and pointing the finger at one pol alone is, well you guessed it. Bullshit.
The impeached president trump is a liar, plain and simple. It's only his devoted fanatics that are unwilling to face this fact.
Because you say so, yet you can't tell us what his lies are!
