Trump claims presidents can declassify documents ‘even by thinking about it

If there are no paper documents today (as opposed to the 70's) then what were the classified documents collected as a function of the search warrant in the MAL store room and in the FPOTUS's desk draw on August 8th with highly classified cover sheets and documents (evidence photo submitted to the court)?

Of course there are still paper copies of documents and multiple controlled copies in multiple locations.

WW
I didn’t say hard copies didn’t exist. I said there arent a limited number of hard copies that someone catalogs and tracks. Im not sure where everyone got the idea that that’s the way things work in that world. Movies I suspect, but having worked in the IC my entire adult life I can assure you it doesn’t.
 
I provided a long post and you took the time to go through it and address different points, that is appreciated even though I definitely disagree with some of them. That is the nature of a discussion board.

However I will take exception to this one statement as it references me personally, no where does my posting indicate that I disagree with the concept that the President has ultimate classification and declassification if legally permissible. For example a President can't classify documents for strictly political gain
I'm guessing that presidents of both parties classify things for political gain pretty frequently. If you could prove it, it could be an impeachable offense, if congress thought so, but I'm not sure there is a criminal statute that says that.
or to hide evidence of a crime.
Hiding evidence of a crime is a crime in itself, outside of classification. So that doesn't affect any debate about presidential powers to classify. I have the sole power to spend my paycheck. If I hire a contract killer with my paycheck, that is a crime, but that doesn't change the fact that I have sole power to spend it.

However when it comes to national security information as a function of government, I have no problem with the President having ultimate authority.

However for something to actually be classified or declassified the President cannot secretly and mentally do it. (S)he must tell someone so they can execute a legal order or document such classification or declassification actions again so that the procedures as it impacts derivative (yes, better word then subordinate - thank you.) classified information.
The president would best be served to tell someone about a declassification decision if they need to know about the declassification decision. In the case at point, it is a president deciding in his mind that documents that he wishes to take with him to the white house residence, and in the end to the future office of the former president, he only need make the decision and order them taken.

Or just put them in his briefcase and take them himself.

He doesn't have to explain himself to anyone - when it comes to classification and declassification - because he is the president.

If he decided in his mind to declassify documents, and ordered a subordinate to take the documents to an unsecure location without telling him they are declassified, the subordinate would have a solid defense if the FBI arrested him on the way to his car. He doesn't need a signed paper, or a recording of the president saying "I declassify these." The fact that the president ordered him to take them to an unsecure locations makes it reasonable for him to presume the president declassified them.

Just like Biden does when he takes documents to his beach house. There is no ceremony where Biden announces the temporary declassification of each document.

All this was decided by the USSC. The debate on here is between people who accept that truth and people who do not.

WW

(Note I use "ultimate" and you use "sole". There are others with legislative authority under the law and via the EO who have classification and declassification authority, so I use ultimate meaning the highest level.)
You're not wrong to use ultimate, but it is just as correct to say "sole." In particular because as my upstream article stated about the Obama administration, far to many subordinates take it upon themselves to put classification stamps on material that the president has not ordered classified.

It reminds me very much of people in the administration going to congress and claiming executive privilege. Perfectly fine and correct, if the president has invoked it. But with many of those witnesses, they presume the answer to every question is executive privileged. That is not right. The president has the privilege and should invoke it or not invoke it and be able to be held accountable for it.

That is a problem under administrations from both parties for at least the last thirty years.
 
More than a little ironic that those who profess not to understand that a president has sole authority over classification and that if he thinks a document is declassified, then for his purposes it is also profess to believe that a person can change their sex by mere "thinking" that they are now female.
ho8bix1csfca1.jpg
 
More than a little ironic that those who profess not to understand that a president has sole authority over classification and that if he thinks a document is declassified, then for his purposes it is also profess to believe that a person can change their sex by mere "thinking" that they are now female.
I believe you should actually read ( and hopefully comprehend ) Executive Order 12356 of April 2nd., 1982. It covers all the classification and declassification regulations. You keep saying the president has sole authority over classification, that is not true. The president, the vice president, agency and department heads all can classify and declassify government documents. One person couldn't handle the workload. In 2014 alone the government produced 77.4 million classified documents.
 
I believe you should actually read ( and hopefully comprehend ) Executive Order 12356 of April 2nd., 1982. It covers all the classification and declassification regulations. You keep saying the president has sole authority over classification, that is not true. The president, the vice president, agency and department heads all can classify and declassify government documents. One person couldn't handle the workload. In 2014 alone the government produced 77.4 million classified documents.
Yup, but let’s pretend he wants to reclassify material and assume he has the authority to do so.

Even if the president did, it has to be relabeled and dated and relocated in the archives. It isn’t like a president can change a classification……then keep it a secret. That’s bull shit and not the proper procedure.

Trump by his own admission did no such thing as he did it in his mind, then declared, they were his to keep after he took them. Of course he took them AFTER he had left office on his way out the door. So he is a crook committing a federal crime and is without a pardon.

Let’s assume the right’s story about presidential authority is true, and while president Biden can do anything he wants. Biden is president, he just pardon himself for having the documents and tells the right to kiss his ass. I’m fine with that.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top