What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Trump calls for immediate release of Warrant

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1,625
Points
163
did i say they did? of course he made this Stalinist attack public…democracy dies in darkness


there was a criminal investigation…but like most things the demafasict do it was a shame. Obama directly interfered to protect clinton….they stalinist think they are above the law
And now you’re just making shit up.

The investigation was completely reviewed after it was completed. There was no interference from Obama. The DoJ made their decision independently. They explained their rational completely and no one has been able to challenge it.

It would have been easy for Trump’s appointed prosecutors to indict her, but they didn’t because they made the right decision.
 

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
26,282
Reaction score
15,839
Points
1,288
And now you’re just making shit up.

The investigation was completely reviewed after it was completed. There was no interference from Obama. The DoJ made their decision independently. They explained their rational completely and no one has been able to challenge it.

It would have been easy for Trump’s appointed prosecutors to indict her, but they didn’t because they made the right decision.
haha of course there was! he literally gave an interview and said she was innocent in the middle of the “investigation.”

yes it would of been easy to get an indictment…comey did a great job laying out indictment. trump was kind enough not to prosecute, largely because he didn’t want to prosecute political rivals …that’s what stalinist do.
 

Marener

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
1,625
Points
163
haha of course there was! he literally gave an interview and said she was innocent in the middle of the “investigation.”

yes it would of been easy to get an indictment…comey did a great job laying out indictment. trump was kind enough not to prosecute, largely because he didn’t want to prosecute political rivals …that’s what stalinist do.
Trump had no problem sending Ukraine after Biden, but I digress.

You’re claiming that Trump is the reason that politicians are above the law. I thought he was pro-law and order. Now you say he’s not. Your anger about her lack of prosecution is just as much with Comey as it is with Trump.

In reality (the place where the rest of us live), Trump’s appointed prosecutors could have easily prosecuted her without asking Trump. No reasonable prosecutor would have for exactly the reasons that Comey outlined. He was right.
 

struth

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2021
Messages
26,282
Reaction score
15,839
Points
1,288
Trump had no problem sending Ukraine after Biden, but I digress.

You’re claiming that Trump is the reason that politicians are above the law. I thought he was pro-law and order. Now you say he’s not. Your anger about her lack of prosecution is just as much with Comey as it is with Trump.

In reality (the place where the rest of us live), Trump’s appointed prosecutors could have easily prosecuted her without asking Trump. No reasonable prosecutor would have for exactly the reasons that Comey outlined. He was right.
i have no idea what you are rambling on about in this post.

Sending Ukraine after Xiden? Ukraine has issues with Xiden dating back to when he backmailed then to get a prosecutor fired…

I never claimed Trump was above the law, ans he certainly isn’t the reason demafasict believe they are

Yes any reasonable prosecutor could easily prosecute her…i agree. But trump didn’t want to…so his DOJ didn’t. It should of been prosecuted by the obama regime but they protected her…trump just wanted the long national nightmare over…frankly that was the biggest mistake of his admin.
 

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
68,420
Reaction score
26,105
Points
2,250
Location
In a Republic, actually
The warrant really isn't going to provide much information so............

What is needed is the argument to get the warrant and that isn't going to be released so both sides are once again playing the people.
Disagree.

The warrant will demonstrate the search was perfectly lawful and Constitutional – neither ‘partisan’ nor a ‘witch hunt.’

The warrant will demonstrate the search was perfectly appropriate and necessary given the serious nature of the documents.

And the warrant will demonstrate the search was in no manner an ‘abuse of power.’
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
49,018
Reaction score
16,680
Points
2,210
Disagree.

The warrant will demonstrate the search was perfectly lawful and Constitutional – neither ‘partisan’ nor a ‘witch hunt.’

Everyone despite what they say know it was legal.

The warrant will demonstrate the search was perfectly appropriate and necessary given the serious nature of the documents.

And the warrant will demonstrate the search was in no manner an ‘abuse of power.’

The warrant will note what they were after, not that they found them.
 

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
21,859
Reaction score
11,236
Points
1,265
Location
USA
Didn't say anything about any mole, Butch....Fact remains that someone had to swear out an affidavit in order to fulfill the probable cause requirement.

When is that going to be released?
If you folks believe all of the judges, all of the FBI, everyone is corrupt -- why woud they have to have an affidavit at all??

Yall already said they planted evidence on Trump...so why believe they had some sworn affidavit?
 
OP
EvilEyeFleegle

EvilEyeFleegle

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2017
Messages
11,567
Reaction score
5,273
Points
415
If you folks believe all of the judges, all of the FBI, everyone is corrupt -- why woud they have to have an affidavit at all??

Yall already said they planted evidence on Trump...so why believe they had some sworn affidavit?
Have you not learned that logic holds no sway with these people?
 

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2018
Messages
21,859
Reaction score
11,236
Points
1,265
Location
USA
Everyone despite what they say know it was legal.



The warrant will note what they were after, not that they found them.
Do you have this attitude towards all FBI search warrants or just ones against Trump??

What scenario would be easier for the FBI to frame, plant evidence, etc -- one in which they do it against a random person with no power -- or against the former president of the US?
 

pknopp

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
49,018
Reaction score
16,680
Points
2,210
Do you have this attitude towards all FBI search warrants or just ones against Trump??

What scenario would be easier for the FBI to frame, plant evidence, etc -- one in which they do it against a random person with no power -- or against the former president of the US?

I said nothing concerning the planting of evidence.
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
86,094
Reaction score
68,901
Points
3,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top