Trump 2020



UNBELIEVABLE: Trump Rally Speech in Milwaukee Wisconsin

Trump 2020 !

He has made America Great Again , so rejoice !

then be at peace

Namaste

Aussie propagandist for Fat Donnie. WTF do you know?


Well much much more than you slowey ..

I was born on this planet and research Trump Derangement Syndrome and you

Are a Cronic Victim .. so Lol at that one sunshine

What happened to your head... radiation? Not your f'n sunshine you brain damaged oof.

Yeah I caught that, what the fock?
 
FARRELL: Spygate Could Make Watergate Look Like A Third-Rate Burglary

FARRELL: Spygate Could Make Watergate Look Like A Third-Rate Burglary
US-POLITICS-GOVERNMENT-JUSTICE

CHRIS FARRELLJUDICIAL WATCH
March 10, 20202:34 PM ET

FONT SIZE:
The Spygate scandal is shaping up to be the most significant political abuse of government power in history. And it may be even larger than people expect.
The investigation by U.S. Attorney John Durham into the origins of the FBI’s Russian collusion investigation – or as President Trump prefers to call it, the witch hunt – continues to expand. Durham reportedly opened criminal investigations last fall. And unlike the narrow Justice Department Inspector General’s review of the abuse of the FISA process, Durham is looking into the questionable activities of other government agencies, in particular the CIA and its former director John Brennan.

The widening scope involves not only the agencies being investigated, but who was being targeted and why. Earlier last week Sharyl Attkisson reported that, based on her sources in the intelligence and law enforcement communities, the authorizations to spy on Trump functionaries such as Carter Page or former campaign manager Paul Manafort were actually pretexts for a much more expansive web of surveillance that could include anyone in contact with Page, or even anyone twice removed from the ostensible target. Hence, thousands of people could have been unknowingly caught up in the Spygate web and are still unaware that their privacy had been violated under the severely compromised FISA process.
This ties into the whirlwind of “unmaskings” during the 2016-17 transition period. Names of people inadvertently caught up in this expansive web, which ordinarily would be classified and their privacy interests protected, were revealed and information sent to Democratic allies in Capitol Hill for “safe keeping.” Judicial Watch has chronicled how Obama’s United Nations Ambassador Samantha Power and National Security Adviser Susan Rice, among others, colluded in this effort to bolster the “insurance policy” to hobble the Trump presidency.
There is also the matter of President Obama finalizing rules in the closing days of his administration that opened the raw, unedited information feeds collected by the National Security Agency to all of the 16 other agencies in the Intelligence Community before any privacy protections are implemented. This ill-considered and unnecessary rule change vastly expanded the potential for abuse in the system and was a curious move for Obama to make in the waning days of his presidency.
However, it makes perfect sense if you believe that Obama officials were doing their utmost to put in place a bureaucratic infrastructure seeking to undermine the Trump administration before it began. Also, factor in the distrust of NSA head Admiral Michael S. Rogers, who met with President-elect Trump in November 2016 and allegedly blew the whistle on the Trump Tower wiretapping.
 
US continues crackdown on Huawei, adds charges to New York case - CNN

US charges Huawei with racketeering, escalating crackdown on tech giant




By Brian Fung and Clare Duffy, CNN Business



Updated 2314 GMT (0714 HKT) February 13, 2020


New York (CNN Business)The US government has charged Chinese technology giant Huawei with racketeering and conspiracy to steal trade secrets, according to a superseding indictment unsealed Thursday in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

A third charge alleges that Huawei engaged in wire fraud to steal intellectual property. The three new allegations supplement more than a dozen other charges already lodged against the company in a case originally unsealed last January. Huawei pleaded not guilty to the initial charges last March.
The Trump administration has been locked in a battle with Huawei for more than a year, as US officials have waged a campaign urging allies not to use Huawei's 5G equipment and enacted other measures aimed at stunting the company's growth.

The earlier charges alleged that Huawei committed bank fraud and violated economic sanctions against Iran, claims that the company has denied. Thursday's indictment also reveals new details about alleged Huawei business dealings in Iran and North Korea.
The Justice Department accuses Huawei of lying about its relationship with an affiliate business called Skycom, which allegedly helped Iran's government perform "domestic surveillance, including during the demonstrations in Tehran in 2009."
Federal prosecutors claim that when presented with evidence, "the defendants allegedly made repeated misstatements to US officials, including FBI agents and representatives from the US House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence," according to a press release from the Justice Department.
Huawei's CFO, Meng Wanzhou, is also named as a defendant in the case. The superseding indictment also charges other individuals whom the Justice Department said have not yet been apprehended and whose names have not been publicly released.
On Thursday, Huawei accused the US government of seeking to "irrevocably damage Huawei's reputation" for competitive reasons, after the Justice Department announced the additional allegations.
COMMUNIST FRONT CORPORATION: GCHQ discovered ‘nationally significant’ vulnerability in Huawei equipment.

Investigators at the UK’s Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) found an issue so severe that it was withheld from the company, according to an oversight report published on Thursday.
Vulnerabilities are usually software design failures which could allow hostile actors (in particular the Chinese state when it comes to Huawei) to conduct a cyber attack. They are not necessarily intentional and can’t be seen as an indication of any hostile intent on the part of the developers themselves.
Don’t trust China.
 

Forum List

Back
Top