To what degree is it appropriate for a sitting president to deprecate a SCOTUS decision?

The USSC has become another arm of the repub party...just like FOX news is the mouthpiece of the repub party. That is sad....

Thank you for being a complete and unqualified failure at answering the question...
 
So you're saying the people in my state should be able to make a religious based decision on whether abortion is available to women who live there? How odd.
That's the way it's set up. The federal government has washed its hands of the issue, and if they want to get involved again, they'll have to actually pass laws and get legislators onboard. Now, If people in a state want to use biology to determine that a human life is involved in a pregnancy and deserves protection, they can. The issue is no longer decided by 7 men on the SC.
 
"The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon the vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by the decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers."

Abraham Lincoln

A majority of Americans neither voted for SC justices nor the prez who appointed the last three.
 
"The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon the vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by the decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers."

Abraham Lincoln

A majority of Americans neither voted for SC justices nor the prez who appointed the last three.
1. The citizens have NEVER voted for SC justices, and none voted for the ones that Lincoln (who wrote that) appointed.
2. It's totally irrelevant how many popular votes the president received because he got the only ones that mattered, just like Lincoln did.
3. This action by the SC has taken power from the federal government and returned it to the people, who now can vote their conscience.
 
"The candid citizen must confess that if the policy of the Government upon the vital questions affecting the whole people is to be irrevocably fixed by the decisions of the Supreme Court, the instant they are made in ordinary litigation between parties in personal actions, the people will have ceased to be their own rulers."

Abraham Lincoln

A majority of Americans neither voted for SC justices nor the prez who appointed the last three.

I read that quote to be a call to action to seek appropriate legislation or constitutional amendment when it turns out the law is contrary to the will of the people. Not as encouragement to simply set aside the rule of law when you do not like the law.
 
Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

How should the men involved be dealth with that run away from their children leaving behind a single Mom?
 
It's so wrong to expect a demented president to have any consideration for the wisdom of The Supreme Court when he/she/it has no consideration for what his/her/its policies have done to reduce your children to hunger and a life of privation.

Now bow down or expect a knock on the door from the FBIstapo.
 
Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

Americans have a constitutional right to criticize their government.

End of story.
 
They lied

They specifically stated Roe v Wade was the law of the land and that they supported the precedence

If they thought Roe was UnConstitutional, they should have stated so when they were confirmed

Instead……They lied
When did they state that?
 
Americans have a constitutional right to criticize their government.

End of story.
But he’s not just an ordinary American. He’s the President of the United States, dumping on a co-equal branch of the government, and on foreign soil. Completely inappropriate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top