Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But he can easily say that, because the majority of voters, chose him to be President.Trump needs to act immediately. To see the Democrats come unhinged like they did with Kavanaugh, just weeks before the election, will remind people of who they really are. This is a no brainer for Trump.
Lyin, cheatin, Moscow Mitch:
"Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.
Run the most right wing sonofabitch we can find. Straight through the Judiciary Committee right to the Senate floor. They want to play their stupid little fuck, fuck impeachment games...we can play ours.I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
He needs to offer up several...so the dems can't villify one and use them as a rallying cry to get their base to vote--trump needs to have multiple races and special groups--then hold the vote right after the election--end of November.The day after that far left liberal loon is lowered into the ground.
Pres.Trump needs to present the person he has chosen to take her place. ..
Trump won 304-232But he can easily say that, because the majority of voters, chose him to be President.Trump needs to act immediately. To see the Democrats come unhinged like they did with Kavanaugh, just weeks before the election, will remind people of who they really are. This is a no brainer for Trump.
Lyin, cheatin, Moscow Mitch:
"Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.
President Trump doesn't have that luxury of support...
The people in this country, by majority, chose someone else to be President....the electoral college got him there....
Obama won both.
Precisely, if Hillary Clinton was President now... you bet your ass every single Democrat would be saying we need to replace her before the year ends. 100%Democrats want to pack the court.
They wouldn't think twice about doing this if the shoe was on the other foot.
What would harry reid do?
If Biden wins and Republicans try to go against the voice of the American voters and hold hearings before January, they will not have the votes to confirm. By December, Republicans could have 3 nay votes which might be enough to kill confirmation.Even if Biden were to win (perish the thought), Trump would still be POTUS for 3 more months and can select a justice before or after the election. I say do it immediately, to stop any leftist loon lower court decision already on the dockets.
Should be interesting to see Kamala Harris trying to knock down Trump's pick, like she outrageously did to Kavanaugh. Will give Trump and Pence lots of ammunition for the debates.
But he can easily say that, because the majority of voters, chose him to be President.Trump needs to act immediately. To see the Democrats come unhinged like they did with Kavanaugh, just weeks before the election, will remind people of who they really are. This is a no brainer for Trump.
Lyin, cheatin, Moscow Mitch:
"Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.
President Trump doesn't have that luxury of support...
The people in this country, by majority, chose someone else to be President....the electoral college got him there....
Obama won both.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAPI'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
That's one reason it will happen before the election.If Biden wins and Republicans try to go against the voice of the American voters and hold hearings before January, they will not have the votes to confirm. By December, Republicans could have 3 nay votes which might be enough to kill confirmation.Even if Biden were to win (perish the thought), Trump would still be POTUS for 3 more months and can select a justice before or after the election. I say do it immediately, to stop any leftist loon lower court decision already on the dockets.
Should be interesting to see Kamala Harris trying to knock down Trump's pick, like she outrageously did to Kavanaugh. Will give Trump and Pence lots of ammunition for the debates.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAPI'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...
The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anythingDemocrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAPI'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...
The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
As they should if Republicans confirm a new justice after the election should that happen. Who could blame them?It is a gamble either way it goes, and I'm inclined to have it completed before 2021.Oh, I agree, fully, Sunni, but it's the drip, drip, drip this close to the election with fresh meat on the table.The Dem's already go after Trump 24/7/365 over everything and anything. One more item on their TDS hate list really isn't going to make a difference. ...On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump won 2016 by putting pedal to the floor, balls to the wall, full steam ahead, no second guessing, never looking back.
2020, Trump starts making measured decisions, does the "sensible" thing and holds off replacing Ruth until after the election, then loses the election, Biden gets in and replaces Ruth with another Kagan.
You really want to gamble that?
Trouble is that if Harris gets in and the dems win the Senate, they could pack the
courts with liberals.
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
But he can easily say that, because the majority of voters, chose him to be President.Trump needs to act immediately. To see the Democrats come unhinged like they did with Kavanaugh, just weeks before the election, will remind people of who they really are. This is a no brainer for Trump.
Lyin, cheatin, Moscow Mitch:
"Elections have consequences"-Barry Hussein Obama.
President Trump doesn't have that luxury of support...
The people in this country, by majority, chose someone else to be President....the electoral college got him there....
Obama won both.
An election has consequences for a few years.............SCOTUS for decades.........
There is no comparison......and we should push it now. The last Presidential election's BIGGEST ISSUE was the Supreme Court...........to me.............as had we lost the ramifications of Judicial Activism by the left would have been on steroids.........Not to mention Ginsberg would have retired under Hillary as well.
That would have been a disaster for this nation.
RAM IT HOME........damn the torpedoes.
If that were to happen, then the most recent ruling by a lower court would stand. So no, there would be no Constitutional crisis.Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAPI'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
