To all French citizens and appeasers...

[preemptingyou03]

My father hit the beaches of Normandy, he was there to help liberate Paris, getting shot twice. French citizens hugged and kissed him that day. When he returned to France on vacation in 1994, for the 50th anniversary of D-Day, he was treated like a king, because he was wearing his VFW uniform. He was given free meals and French men and women would shake his hand in the street.

Now, my question is this: Why is it, that today, French citizens view the United States of America as the biggest threat to the world? My question is, why are French citizens vandalizing World War II grave yards? My question is, why are French citizens over looking the financial ties your leader and government had with a mass murdering dictator?

We fought two World Wars for you. We lost hundreds of thousands of lives. We gave you billions and billions of dollars in economic, reconstruction, and military aid. We risked nuclear war for you, for over 40 years, against the Soviet Union. We defeated imperialism, Nazism, and communism on your behalf. From 1914 until 1989, our entire mindset was to keep your nation as well as your continent free from tyranny.

We were attacked on 9/11 from a terrorist group. Nineteen men with box cutters hijacked four planes and flew them into our buildings.

Why the passivity on your part? We wish to confront all forms of terror. Why is your government going to African nations ready to veto our resolution? Why are you opposing us, for financial and political, and cynical reasons? Saddam violated 17 war treaties. He funded terrorist groups. He slaughtered hundreds of thousands. And we believed, as did your country, (as did almost every nation in the UN) that he had WMD, and he still might have had them. If he didn't have them, he wished to and would have had them very soon. In fact, according to FRENCH and GERMAN intelligence, Saddam would have had THREE NUCLEAR WEAPONS by 2005.

So why aren't you supporting us in Iraq? Why are you supporting us so half-assed in Afghanistan? Why, after us devoting a century to your security, are you opposing us? Why did you inflame anti-Americanism on such a grand scale?

Could it be Bush's economic policies like not joining your socialist "save the whale" policies? Could it be your ties to Iraqi oil? Please defend your nation.

 

[Jmarie]

I could not have said that any better..WAY TO GO!!!!!

 

[Zhukov]

More likely it's because they are scared witless of their large and growing muslim population.

 

[preemptingyou03]

Yet they ban Muslim girls from wearing their religious symbols in school?

When will the French get it? When will they do something whole-assed?

 

[Zhukov]

Well, I guess we can say one thing for certain:

The French are absolutely, positively, without a doubt, NOT afraid of little girls. I suppose that is a start.

 

[preemptingyou03]

Hahahaha. Classic.

Honestly... can a French citizen explain why they have been such assholes to us?

 

[Zhukov]

Who cares? I'm sure it's all our fault.

 

[Jmarie]

Originally posted by preemptingyou03
Hahahaha. Classic.

Honestly... can a French citizen explain why they have been such assholes to us?

because they think we should stay out of everything like them and plus they think we owe them..As if we owe anyone anything..this is what I think of France :finger: :chains: :firing:

 

[insein]

Originally posted by preemptingyou03
Yet they ban Muslim girls from wearing their religious symbols in school?

When will the French get it? When will they do something whole-assed?

That about sums up the french, lol.

 

[maria5583]

There are so many inconsistencies in this post that I don't even know where to begin. For the record I am not French, I am Canadian, but I feel that I have to say something because some of these claims are outright ridiculous. First off, France like Canada have always been great allies of the U.S., make no mistake about that. But your best friends are the ones that tell you that you are making an ass out of yourself, and that is what the U.S. has been doing with this war. Iraq is on the verge of a civil war, which the U.S. can't control. The United States have lost many young men and women and killed many others and will continue to do so until they leave Iraq. And for what? WMD, that have not been found, and will NEVER be found because Iraq did NOT have WMD. They had them in the 1980s because the U.S. sold them WMDs NOT France. France has been acitve in the war against terrorism as has Canada but both countries know that this is an illegal war because it has no UN approval and that's why the U.S has not received the support that it expected, not because France and the rest of the world is anti-American. Although France is a ally of the U.S. as is Canada, it does not always have to agree with American polices because it might be hard to believe, but the U.S,. is NOT always right.
Consequently, these claims that France should help the U.S. because the U.S. helped France are ludicris because the truth of the matter is that France was in serious danger because of the Germans as was the rest of the world, including the U.S. And although I feel indebted to men and women like your father, because he truly is a hero, inspite of the desperate pleas from the Allies, the U.S. only joined the war after the Allies were seen as about to lose the war to the Germans, and the U.S. had invested so much money of them, and if the lost they knew they would never get the money back. Futhermore, Iraq did not pose any danger to the U.S. because it did not have weapons of mass destruction nor would it have had 3 by 2005 because they are very difficult to acquire. Only about 8 countries have them because they are seen as very destructive and are very difficult to build and even the richest countries in the world can't build them, let alone Iraq, and they are even difficult to acquire from other countries because countries are extremely careful with them. Although, the French have vandalized American properity, American's have done the same to French interests. Oh, and by the way, French fries are not from France but from Belguim!Huessin did NOT establish terrorist organizations that is the most ridiculous thing that I have ever heard in my life, who comes up with these things? Huessin's regime was secular in ever sense, and although he was an evil dictator that killed many people, there are worse dictators in the world. Ask Mr.Bush for their numbers, he is really good friends with them.

 

[jimnyc]

Hmmm, yeah, ok

Imported Weapons to Iraq 1973-2002 (% share by country):

USSR: 57%
France: 13%
China: 12%
Czechoslovakia: 7%
Poland: 4%
Brazil: 2%
Egypt: 1%
Romania: 1%
Denmark: 1%
Libya: 1%
USA: 1%
UK: 0%

 

[maria5583]

Maybe you should learn how to read. I was referring to weapons of mass destruction not simply "weapons" that can be anything. And if Iraq has so many weapons why did so few Iraqi soldiers have weapons to fight with when they were defending their country when the U.S. illegally invaded their country? I have checked your sources, these are merely conventional weapons NOT WMDs. Do you even know what are classified as weapons of mass destruction? Duh!

 

[jimnyc]

Originally posted by maria5583
Maybe you should learn how to read. I was referring to weapons of mass destruction not simply "weapons" that can be anything. And if Iraq has so many weapons why did so few Iraqi soldiers have weapons to fight with when they were defending their country when the U.S. illegally invaded their country?

Maybe YOU should learn how to read. I never stated anything either way. I simply pointed out that the french pussies were more interested in money than doing the right thing.

I don't care what you believe and what you don't. The cowardly french were making 5.1 billion dollars in sales per year to Iraq as one of their biggest suppliers of arms.

I guess it's best for them to sell their weaponry to those who aren't afraid to use it!

And if the invasion was illegal, where are the charges? C'mon, twit, show me what action has been taken thus far against these illegal activities. Surely the worlds other powers wouldn't just allow this to slide by if they had anything actionable.

 

[jimnyc]

Originally posted by maria5583
I have checked your sources

Oh really? And what exactly was my sources, stupid?

 

[jimnyc]

Read more about the french pussies and why they vowed to veto a resolution before even viewing it:

In 1945, British and U.S. troops paid a heavy price to liberate France from the yoke of Nazi oppression and domination.

Most Americans find it puzzling and extremely disappointing that France seems ungrateful for those sacrifices. Many of us will never forget those sacrifices because we have fathers and grandfathers and brothers and uncles who never came home from that mission. They are still there beneath French soil. We wonder how France could have forgotten – how it could have turned against us in favor of a tinpot Middle East dictator who was raised from the age of 10 by a leader of the Nazi cause in the region.

Why did France assume the leading role internationally as Saddam Hussein's protectorate?

It's business and it's personal – and the story begins a long time ago.

In 1975, when Jacques Chirac first served as prime minister of France, he visited Baghdad – even before Saddam Hussein had assumed his full dictatorial powers.

Chirac helped pave the way for a very lucrative deal for French oil companies in developing Iraq's No. 1 export – besides terrorism, that is. Those oil companies negotiated a 23 percent stake in Iraqi oil.

Shortly thereafter, Saddam Hussein visited Chirac in Paris – the first and last time he visited a Western nation.

Chirac approved the construction of Iraq's first nuclear reactor. Remember that one? In 1981, the Israeli air force had the good sense to destroy it before it ever went online. Where would we be today – 23 years later – if Iraq had been able to reprocess the plutonium in that plant and turn it into a nuclear bomb factory?
.....

These are not the short-range SCUDS or the Al Samoud 2 missiles we're hearing about in the news. These would be much bigger, much more powerful missiles that could easily carry weapons of mass destruction to distant countries. French businesses are involved in supplying materials to Iraq to develop these weapons despite the United Nations embargo against them.

Not only is the French government winking as French businesses help China and Syria smuggle these illicit materials to Iraq, but some are actually producing components of advanced missile systems under contract to Iraq.

Clearly France is protecting some very old, very deep relationships it has cultivated in Iraq. These are very lucrative relationships. And they are very dangerous and destructive relationships for the rest of the world.

Ironically, it is these compromising business and personal relationships that are causing the French today to be the major international roadblock to the liberation by British and U.S. troops of the Iraqi people from a Nazi disciple named Saddam Hussein.

What does France hope to achieve? Chirac thinks he can persuade Saddam Hussein to step aside – not in a way that will free the Iraqi people from tyranny, but to transition to a new generation of tyranny, one that will maintain the free flow of oil revenues to France, one that will maintain and even increase France's influence in the region, one that will keep Iraqi markets open to French goods, especially arms.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31552

 

[maria5583]

No maybe you should learn how to read and in engage in a mature conversation without childish name calling. Those numbers are for conventional weapons NOT weapons of mass destruction. Do you even know the difference? And yes buddy the war Iraq is an illegal war because there are certain regulations that a country must take into consideration before engaging in a war. It needs a UN approval, which the U.S. did not get. And the reason why there are no charges is simply because there is no world government, only a world court and the U.S. continues to claim immunty, time will tell if they will be charged with anything. So what country cares more about money then doing the right thing? Although, the U.S. hasn't been Iraq's major trading partner in CONVENTIONAL weapons, it was the U.S. that armed Iraq with WMDs, which it did no longer have in 2003 when they invaded. So who cares more about money than doing the right thing.

 

[jimnyc]

Originally posted by maria5583
No maybe you should learn how to read and in engage in a mature conversation without childish name calling. Those numbers are for conventional weapons NOT weapons of mass destruction. Do you even know the difference?

Are you really this dense? Where did I state those numbers had anything to do with WMD? The french are a bunch of pussies that were more interested in their billions of dollars in sales than in preventing terrorism.

And yes buddy the war Iraq is an illegal war because there are certain regulations that a country must take into consideration before engaging in a war. It needs a UN approval, which the U.S. did not get. And the reason why there are no charges is simply because there is no world government, only a world court and the U.S. continues to claim immunty, time will tell if they will be charged with anything. So what country cares more about money then doing the right thing? Although, the U.S. hasn't been Iraq's major trading partner in CONVENTIONAL weapons, it was the U.S. that armed Iraq with WMDs, which it did no longer have in 2003 when they invaded. So who cares more about money than doing the right thing.

You are seriously delusional but I didn't expect much less. The war is quite legal and your theories amount to a big pile of shit. There are no charges because there is nothing actionable.

 

[maria5583]

http://www.queensjournal.ca/article.php?point=vol131/issue1/features/lead2

This website has the number you presented and it takes note of conventional weapons, and that it says that Iraq acquired biological weapons. If they did, where are they now?

 

[jimnyc]

Originally posted by maria5583
http://www.queensjournal.ca/article.php?point=vol131/issue1/features/lead2

This website has the number you presented and it takes note of conventional weapons, and that it says that Iraq acquired biological weapons. If they did, where are they now?

Many have been destroyed by inspectors and some by Iraqi's themselves. Did you not read the inspection reports?

 

[maria5583]

Dude, why would coventional weapons pose a threat to the U.S.? If that is the case, we should be really be watching out for the U.S. and not Iraq. You arguments lack convincing power because you insult people without really providing arguments, maybe you should brush up on your political science instead of calling people names, because if you did you would see that it is an illegal war and many of your presidents are war criminals.