This is why we have gun crime...2 times convicted gun felon, fires illegal gun while on bond for another illegal gun case.

[2aguy]

If the democrats would stop releasing violent gun criminals into black neighborhoods......someone please explain why they keep doing that..........then our gun crime rate would be reduced 95%.....

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

The Lincoln (20th) Police District praised its tactical team on Twitter for a “persistent and dedicated investigation” of the case which it said involved shots fired at the hospital guards. Charges were filed this week.

Two security guards escorted Justin Cortes, 31, from the hospital on October 8 because he was acting erratically, Assistant State’s Attorney Loukas Kalliantasis said.

Cortes allegedly drove up to the hospital a short time later, pointed a gun at one of the guards, and said something to the effect of, “I got something for you.” A second guard witnessed the interaction.

Cortes then sped away and fired shots while heading through the parking lot, narrowly missing someone in the area, Kalliantasis said. He did not say Cortes shot at security guards.
----

Cops arrested Cortes when he showed up for a routine court appearance in his pending Class X armed habitual criminal case on February 28.

He is charged with a new count of Class X armed habitual criminal, reckless discharge of a firearm – endangering others, and aggravated assault of a peace officer with a firearm.

Kalliantasis said Cortes was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon in 2018, felony domestic battery in 2013, felony domestic battery by strangulation in 2013, and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon by a gang member in 2010.

#68: Twice-convicted gun offender fired shots, threatened hospital guards while on bond for felony gun case, prosecutors say

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

cwbchicago.com

 

[BULLDOG]

If the democrats would stop releasing violent gun criminals into black neighborhoods......someone please explain why they keep doing that..........then our gun crime rate would be reduced 95%.....

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

The Lincoln (20th) Police District praised its tactical team on Twitter for a “persistent and dedicated investigation” of the case which it said involved shots fired at the hospital guards. Charges were filed this week.

Two security guards escorted Justin Cortes, 31, from the hospital on October 8 because he was acting erratically, Assistant State’s Attorney Loukas Kalliantasis said.

Cortes allegedly drove up to the hospital a short time later, pointed a gun at one of the guards, and said something to the effect of, “I got something for you.” A second guard witnessed the interaction.

Cortes then sped away and fired shots while heading through the parking lot, narrowly missing someone in the area, Kalliantasis said. He did not say Cortes shot at security guards.
----

Cops arrested Cortes when he showed up for a routine court appearance in his pending Class X armed habitual criminal case on February 28.

He is charged with a new count of Class X armed habitual criminal, reckless discharge of a firearm – endangering others, and aggravated assault of a peace officer with a firearm.

Kalliantasis said Cortes was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon in 2018, felony domestic battery in 2013, felony domestic battery by strangulation in 2013, and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon by a gang member in 2010.

#68: Twice-convicted gun offender fired shots, threatened hospital guards while on bond for felony gun case, prosecutors say

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

cwbchicago.com

Statistics show that the woman you describe is more likely to shoot herself or an innocent bystander than she is to shoot the attacker. It is also more likely that the attacker would take the gun from her.

 

[2aguy]

Statistics show that the woman you describe is more likely to shoot herself or an innocent bystander than she is to shoot the attacker. It is also more likely that the attacker would take the gun from her.

And you would have to show those statistics…which you can’t… it thanks for playing.


And nothing you just posted is true or accurate……you idiots make things up and just expect it to be true…….

 

[2aguy]

Statistics show that the woman you describe is more likely to shoot herself or an innocent bystander than she is to shoot the attacker. It is also more likely that the attacker would take the gun from her.

You mean research like this…..?

However, most recent studies with improved methodology are consistently showing that the more forceful the resistance, the lower the risk of a completed rape, with no increase in physical injury. Sarah Ullman's original research (Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1998) and critical review of past studies (Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1997) are especially valuable in solidifying this conclusion.

I wish to single out one particular subtype of physical resistance: Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance. This conclusion is drawn from four types of information.

First, a 1989 study (Furby, Journal of Interpersonal Violence) found that both male and female survey respondents judged a gun to be the most effective means that a potential rape victim could use to fend off the assault. Rape "experts" considered it a close second, after eye-gouging.

Second, raw data from the 1979-1985 installments of the Justice Department's annual National Crime Victim Survey show that when a woman resists a stranger rape with a gun, the probability of completion was 0.1 percent and of victim injury 0.0 percent, compared to 31 percent and 40 percent, respectively, for all stranger rapes (Kleck, Social Problems, 1990).

Third, a recent paper (Southwick, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2000) analyzed victim resistance to violent crimes generally, with robbery, aggravated assault and rape considered together. Women who resisted with a gun were 2.5 times more likely to escape without injury than those who did not resist and 4 times more likely to escape uninjured than those who resisted with any means other than a gun. Similarly, their property losses in a robbery were reduced more than six-fold and almost three-fold, respectively, compared to the other categories of resistance strategy.

Fourth, we have two studies in the last 20 years that directly address the outcomes of women who resist attempted rape with a weapon. (Lizotte, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1986; Kleck, Social Problems, 1990.) The former concludes, "Further, women who resist rape with a gun or knife dramatically decrease their probability of completion." (Lizotte did not analyze victim injuries apart from the rape itself.) The latter concludes that "resistance with a gun or knife is the most effective form of resistance for preventing completion of a rape"; this is accomplished "without creating any significant additional risk of other injury."

The best conclusion from available scientific data, then, is when avoidance of rape has failed and one must choose between

Guns Effective Defense Against Rape

Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance.

www.tysknews.com

 

[BULLDOG]

You mean research like this…..?

However, most recent studies with improved methodology are consistently showing that the more forceful the resistance, the lower the risk of a completed rape, with no increase in physical injury. Sarah Ullman's original research (Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1998) and critical review of past studies (Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1997) are especially valuable in solidifying this conclusion.

I wish to single out one particular subtype of physical resistance: Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance. This conclusion is drawn from four types of information.

First, a 1989 study (Furby, Journal of Interpersonal Violence) found that both male and female survey respondents judged a gun to be the most effective means that a potential rape victim could use to fend off the assault. Rape "experts" considered it a close second, after eye-gouging.

Second, raw data from the 1979-1985 installments of the Justice Department's annual National Crime Victim Survey show that when a woman resists a stranger rape with a gun, the probability of completion was 0.1 percent and of victim injury 0.0 percent, compared to 31 percent and 40 percent, respectively, for all stranger rapes (Kleck, Social Problems, 1990).

Third, a recent paper (Southwick, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2000) analyzed victim resistance to violent crimes generally, with robbery, aggravated assault and rape considered together. Women who resisted with a gun were 2.5 times more likely to escape without injury than those who did not resist and 4 times more likely to escape uninjured than those who resisted with any means other than a gun. Similarly, their property losses in a robbery were reduced more than six-fold and almost three-fold, respectively, compared to the other categories of resistance strategy.

Fourth, we have two studies in the last 20 years that directly address the outcomes of women who resist attempted rape with a weapon. (Lizotte, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1986; Kleck, Social Problems, 1990.) The former concludes, "Further, women who resist rape with a gun or knife dramatically decrease their probability of completion." (Lizotte did not analyze victim injuries apart from the rape itself.) The latter concludes that "resistance with a gun or knife is the most effective form of resistance for preventing completion of a rape"; this is accomplished "without creating any significant additional risk of other injury."

The best conclusion from available scientific data, then, is when avoidance of rape has failed and one must choose between

Guns Effective Defense Against Rape

Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance.

www.tysknews.com

Percent of victim injury 0.0% ? You know tht's not right, don't you?

 

[2aguy]

Percent of victim injury 0.0% ? You know tht's not right, don't you?

Still waiting for your stats...........

 

[1stNickD]

Statistics show that the woman you describe is more likely to shoot herself or an innocent bystander than she is to shoot the attacker. It is also more likely that the attacker would take the gun from her.

And who wrote those statistics and how did they come up with their numbers. Statistics show that when a violent criminal is shot dead in the act, they never commit another violent crime, and the victim is still alive.

 

[2aguy]

And who wrote those statistics and how did they come up with their numbers. Statistics show that when a violent criminal is shot dead in the act, they never commit another violent crime, and the victim is still alive.

He doesn't have those stats....they never do.......

Guns Effective Defense Against Rape

A woman using a gun is less likely to be raped and less likely to be injured during the attack....

Guns Effective Defense Against Rape


However, most recent studies with improved methodology are consistently showing that the more forceful the resistance, the lower the risk of a completed rape, with no increase in physical injury. Sarah Ullman's original research (Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1998) and critical review of past studies (Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1997) are especially valuable in solidifying this conclusion.

I wish to single out one particular subtype of physical resistance: Use of a weapon, and especially a firearm, is statistically a woman's best means of resistance, greatly enhancing her odds of escaping both rape and injury, compared to any other strategy of physical or verbal resistance. This conclusion is drawn from four types of information.

First, a 1989 study (Furby, Journal of Interpersonal Violence) found that both male and female survey respondents judged a gun to be the most effective means that a potential rape victim could use to fend off the assault. Rape "experts" considered it a close second, after eye-gouging.

Second, raw data from the 1979-1985 installments of the Justice Department's annual National Crime Victim Survey show that when a woman resists a stranger rape with a gun, the probability of completion was 0.1 percent and of victim injury 0.0 percent, compared to 31 percent and 40 percent, respectively, for all stranger rapes (Kleck, Social Problems, 1990).

Third, a recent paper (Southwick, Journal of Criminal Justice, 2000) analyzed victim resistance to violent crimes generally, with robbery, aggravated assault and rape considered together. Women who resisted with a gun were 2.5 times more likely to escape without injury than those who did not resist and 4 times more likely to escape uninjured than those who resisted with any means other than a gun. Similarly, their property losses in a robbery were reduced more than six-fold and almost three-fold, respectively, compared to the other categories of resistance strategy.

Fourth, we have two studies in the last 20 years that directly address the outcomes of women who resist attempted rape with a weapon. (Lizotte, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1986; Kleck, Social Problems, 1990.) The former concludes,"Further, women who resist rape with a gun or knife dramatically decrease their probability of completion." (Lizotte did not analyze victim injuries apart from the rape itself.) The latter concludes that "resistance with a gun or knife is the most effective form of resistance for preventing completion of a rape"; this is accomplished "without creating any significant additional risk of other injury."

The best conclusion from available scientific data, then, is when avoidance of rape has failed and one must choose between being raped and resisting, a woman's best option is to resist with a gun in her hands.

 

[Woodznutz]

Death penalty would greatly reduce rapes.

 

[miketx]

Statistics show that the woman you describe is more likely to shoot herself or an innocent bystander than she is to shoot the attacker. It is also more likely that the attacker would take the gun from her.

Praying you are the bystander, liar.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

If the democrats would stop releasing violent gun criminals into black neighborhoods......someone please explain why they keep doing that..........then our gun crime rate would be reduced 95%.....

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

The Lincoln (20th) Police District praised its tactical team on Twitter for a “persistent and dedicated investigation” of the case which it said involved shots fired at the hospital guards. Charges were filed this week.

Two security guards escorted Justin Cortes, 31, from the hospital on October 8 because he was acting erratically, Assistant State’s Attorney Loukas Kalliantasis said.

Cortes allegedly drove up to the hospital a short time later, pointed a gun at one of the guards, and said something to the effect of, “I got something for you.” A second guard witnessed the interaction.

Cortes then sped away and fired shots while heading through the parking lot, narrowly missing someone in the area, Kalliantasis said. He did not say Cortes shot at security guards.
----

Cops arrested Cortes when he showed up for a routine court appearance in his pending Class X armed habitual criminal case on February 28.

He is charged with a new count of Class X armed habitual criminal, reckless discharge of a firearm – endangering others, and aggravated assault of a peace officer with a firearm.

Kalliantasis said Cortes was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon in 2018, felony domestic battery in 2013, felony domestic battery by strangulation in 2013, and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon by a gang member in 2010.

#68: Twice-convicted gun offender fired shots, threatened hospital guards while on bond for felony gun case, prosecutors say

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

cwbchicago.com

It makes no difference.

You, the law abiding gun owner will be blamed and punished instead.
The Left worships huge, oppressive, authoritarian government and wants you helpless before it.

It makes absolutely ZERO difference how wrong they are. They couldn't care less who dies as long as you become a helpless pawn of your oppressive government.

 

[justoffal]

If the democrats would stop releasing violent gun criminals into black neighborhoods......someone please explain why they keep doing that..........then our gun crime rate would be reduced 95%.....

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

The Lincoln (20th) Police District praised its tactical team on Twitter for a “persistent and dedicated investigation” of the case which it said involved shots fired at the hospital guards. Charges were filed this week.

Two security guards escorted Justin Cortes, 31, from the hospital on October 8 because he was acting erratically, Assistant State’s Attorney Loukas Kalliantasis said.

Cortes allegedly drove up to the hospital a short time later, pointed a gun at one of the guards, and said something to the effect of, “I got something for you.” A second guard witnessed the interaction.

Cortes then sped away and fired shots while heading through the parking lot, narrowly missing someone in the area, Kalliantasis said. He did not say Cortes shot at security guards.
----

Cops arrested Cortes when he showed up for a routine court appearance in his pending Class X armed habitual criminal case on February 28.

He is charged with a new count of Class X armed habitual criminal, reckless discharge of a firearm – endangering others, and aggravated assault of a peace officer with a firearm.

Kalliantasis said Cortes was convicted of unlawful use of a weapon by a felon in 2018, felony domestic battery in 2013, felony domestic battery by strangulation in 2013, and aggravated unlawful use of a weapon by a gang member in 2010.

#68: Twice-convicted gun offender fired shots, threatened hospital guards while on bond for felony gun case, prosecutors say

Prosecutors say a twice-convicted gun offender was on bond for a pending Class X felony gun case when he threatened a Swedish Hospital security guard with a pistol and fired shots in the hospital parking lot, narrowly missing a bystander.

cwbchicago.com

Stop and think about this for a moment. You are assuming that well meaning judges are simply making the wrong and stupidly misinformed decision to release them. However I have more faith in them than that. Judges for the most part tend to be intelligent people. They usually know the score. So what's left? How about they purposely release, re-release and re-re-release the felons they know for sure are going to go out there and do it again. Not because they don't understand but because they DO UNDERSTAND. How many of them do you think might be beholding the SOROS bucks, Zucker bucks and Gates bucks? I'm betting that a large number of the judiciary are on the take in one form or another from these sources and others. I mean Soros is very active in all the states AG races....why wouldn't he and others also be active in the dirty money Judiciary too? I have always wondered about Roberts in that regard. HIs sometimes inexplicable positions that he does little or nothing to justify in writing have that look to them.

JO

 

[2aguy]

Stop and think about this for a moment. You are assuming that well meaning judges are simply making the wrong and stupidly misinformed decision to release them. However I have more faith in them than that. Judges for the most part tend to be intelligent people. They usually know the score. So what's left? How about they purposely release, re-release and re-re-release the felons they know for sure are going to go out there and do it again. Not because they don't understand but because they DO UNDERSTAND. How many of them do you think might be beholding the SOROS bucks, Zucker bucks and Gates bucks? I'm betting that a large number of the judiciary are on the take in one form or another from these sources and others. I mean Soros is very active in all the states AG races....why wouldn't he and others also be active in the dirty money Judiciary too? I have always wondered about Roberts in that regard. HIs sometimes inexplicable positions that he does little or nothing to justify in writing have that look to them.

JO

Nope....I am not assuming anything...I know they are intentionally releasing violent criminals over and over again because these judges and prosecutors are mentally ill.......