This Is What Democrats Voted For

[PoliticalChic]

1. Let it be stipulated that no Democrat voter has been able to answer this question:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



2. A corrollary to that query is this:
Why did Obama et al make that no inspections of Iran nuclear facilities were ever accomplished .....or even allowed by the "deal"?????

Israel specified exactly where Iran was breaking the deal....to no avail:

"In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im

3. This is Iran, wedded to the Democrat Party.​

Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism'​

https://www.rferl.org › u-s-state-department-iran-remai...
— Iran remains "the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism," funding international terrorist groups and engaging in "its own terrorist ...



4. Just minutes ago, in a radio interviw, Larry Kudlow bemoaned the 'deal,' and said it has been completed:

"Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say​

Thu, March 3, 2022, 8:06 PM
An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.

Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of the remaining disputes: Iran's insistence that an investigation into its undeclared nuclear activity be dropped. The success of failure of Grossi's visit could determine the fate of the deal."

Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say

An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of...

news.yahoo.com

5.

 

[Donald H]

Why is Iran even negotiating? They have every right to peaceful use of nuclear energy, and as much right as any other country to nuclear weapons hon. It's not as if they don't know the fate of other countries that didn't have the nuclear deterrent!

Good faith and honesty of Iran's leadership has to be the reason, after Trump destroyed a better agreement than will ever be had again.

 

[DGS49]

Under the U.S. Constitution, there is no such thing as a "deal" (or a "Proclamation," for that matter). Without Senate ratification, it is meaningless.

Without making this yet another thread about Trump, this whole situation typifies the difference between the politician-President and the businessman-President. Any businessman knows that no deal is better than a bad deal. For politicians, they are afraid to walk away from a negotiation without a deal for fear of being called out for failure. Trump would never have acceded to the main points in this deal, because he is a businessman who knows the aforementioned principle.

 

[candycorn]

Very happy with my vote for Biden. Looking forward to voting for him again in 2024.

 

[Donald H]

Under the U.S. Constitution, there is no such thing as a "deal" (or a "Proclamation," for that matter). Without Senate ratification, it is meaningless.

There's no cookie monster mentioned in that constitutiion either.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why is Iran even negotiating? They have every right to peaceful use of nuclear energy, and as much right as any other country to nuclear weapons hon. It's not as if they don't know the fate of other countries that didn't have the nuclear deterrent!

Good faith and honesty of Iran's leadership has to be the reason, after Trump destroyed a better agreement than will ever be had again.

. What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



Contrary to what has been the policy of the civilized world for half a century, the back-stabbing crypto-Muslim, Hussein Obama, offers nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages of Iran.

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of ...
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia



Guns are never the problem....whose hands hold the guns is where the problems arise. The same is true of nuclear weapons. But, perhaps that's too nuanced for you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Under the U.S. Constitution, there is no such thing as a "deal" (or a "Proclamation," for that matter). Without Senate ratification, it is meaningless.

Without making this yet another thread about Trump, this whole situation typifies the difference between the politician-President and the businessman-President. Any businessman knows that no deal is better than a bad deal. For politicians, they are afraid to walk away from a negotiation without a deal for fear of being called out for failure. Trump would never have acceded to the main points in this deal, because he is a businessman who knows the aforementioned principle.

Let's not leave Hussein Obama out of the calculations.


The Democrat anti-Semite party has worked tirelessly to destroy Israel.

You voted to continue Obama's plan.


Barack Obama, the #1 funder of radical Islamic fundamentalism and of the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism, in the history of the world.
Missiles from Iran, which Obama funded and greenlighted, as he did with IEDs aimed at our soldiers.
Under Hussein Obama, the United States was the lead benefactor of Islamic terrorism
He gave his nod to ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons for 7th century barbarians.

Barack Obama, in addition to slowing the rise of the oceans, also made the world a safer place to be by funding the world’s worst state sponsor of terrorism while not restricting their ballistic missile program and, at the same time, supporting Hezbollah.
The best friend the homicidal maniacs in charge of Iran ever had was Barack Hussein Obama.
The big question about Hussein Obama was always was he Sunni or Shia…and with the Iran deal, we got answer.



The Democrats can stay in good graces with Hussein Obama, and continue the plan to obliterate Israel, the only nation he sent government-paid lawyers to de-stabilize.
. Hussein Obama:
March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.

Here's Biden's big chance to substantiate the anti-Semitism that was one pillar of the Wehrmacht.....er, Democrat, agenda.

 

[Donald H]

The Treaty on the of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-ProliferationTreaty or NPT,

Thank you for sharing that with us!

 

[Colin norris]

1. Let it be stipulated that no Democrat voter has been able to answer this question:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

I'll answer it ducky. The sanctions placed on them was crippling their economy. They threatened to continue with the programme until Obama gave them aid to help the economy.
What America got was no nuclear bombs dropped anywhere by Iran. Its that simple.
So don't bother asking silly questions again until you know the answer.

2. A corrollary to that query is this:
Why did Obama et al make that no inspections of Iran nuclear facilities were ever accomplished .....or even allowed by the "deal"?????

Israel specified exactly where Iran was breaking the deal....to no avail:

There was no need to antagonise them further.

"In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im

3. This is Iran, wedded to the Democrat Party.​

No they are not you idiot. That's just your hate filled atrophied little brain. You know nothing but hate.

Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism'​

https://www.rferl.org › u-s-state-department-iran-remai...
— Iran remains "the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism," funding international terrorist groups and engaging in "its own terrorist ...



4. Just minutes ago, in a radio interviw, Larry Kudlow bemoaned the 'deal,' and said it has been completed:

"Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say​

Thu, March 3, 2022, 8:06 PM
An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.

Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of the remaining disputes: Iran's insistence that an investigation into its undeclared nuclear activity be dropped. The success of failure of Grossi's visit could determine the fate of the deal."

Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say

An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of...

news.yahoo.com

5. View attachment 610781

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Let it be stipulated that no Democrat voter has been able to answer this question:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



2. A corrollary to that query is this:
Why did Obama et al make that no inspections of Iran nuclear facilities were ever accomplished .....or even allowed by the "deal"?????

Israel specified exactly where Iran was breaking the deal....to no avail:

"In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im

3. This is Iran, wedded to the Democrat Party.​

Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism'​

https://www.rferl.org › u-s-state-department-iran-remai...
— Iran remains "the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism," funding international terrorist groups and engaging in "its own terrorist ...



4. Just minutes ago, in a radio interviw, Larry Kudlow bemoaned the 'deal,' and said it has been completed:

"Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say​

Thu, March 3, 2022, 8:06 PM
An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.

Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of the remaining disputes: Iran's insistence that an investigation into its undeclared nuclear activity be dropped. The success of failure of Grossi's visit could determine the fate of the deal."

Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say

An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of...

news.yahoo.com

5. View attachment 610781

 

[Dragonlady]

1. Let it be stipulated that no Democrat voter has been able to answer this question:
What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by Obama's guaranteeing nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?



2. A corrollary to that query is this:
Why did Obama et al make that no inspections of Iran nuclear facilities were ever accomplished .....or even allowed by the "deal"?????

Israel specified exactly where Iran was breaking the deal....to no avail:

"In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im

3. This is Iran, wedded to the Democrat Party.​

Iran Remains 'World's Worst State Sponsor Of Terrorism'​

https://www.rferl.org › u-s-state-department-iran-remai...
— Iran remains "the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism," funding international terrorist groups and engaging in "its own terrorist ...



4. Just minutes ago, in a radio interviw, Larry Kudlow bemoaned the 'deal,' and said it has been completed:

"Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say​

Thu, March 3, 2022, 8:06 PM
An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.

Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of the remaining disputes: Iran's insistence that an investigation into its undeclared nuclear activity be dropped. The success of failure of Grossi's visit could determine the fate of the deal."

Iran nuclear deal near, diplomats say

An agreement to restore the 2015 Iran nuclear deal could be just days away, with negotiators from Europe and Iran making clear that they've reached the final hurdles.Driving the news: Rafael Grossi, the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, will travel to Tehran on Saturday to try to resolve one of...

news.yahoo.com

5. View attachment 610781

1. This is a complete and total lie and it negates reading any further in yet another piece of lying builds from the most obvious Russian troll on the board.

Iran is now weeks away from a nuclear weapon thanks to Donald Trump.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. This is a complete and total lie and it negates reading any further in yet another piece of lying builds from the most obvious Russian troll on the board.

Iran is now weeks away from a nuclear weapon thanks to Donald Trump.

Obama and the Democrats insisted Iran be guaranteed nuclear weapons.

Toward that end, they made certain that there were never any inspections.

You, being brainless, agree with giving the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction.



Your remedial lesson:

"Iran Caught Hiding Nuclear Work, Sparking Call for Full Sanctions ‘Snapback’"

Iran has been blocking inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from accessing key sites that the watchdog group has cited for having traces of undisclosed nuclear materials, fueling speculation that Tehran is again engaged in the secret construction of nuclear weapons-grade material.



Recently installed IAEA chief Rafael Griossi took the unprecedented step this week of going public about Iran's intransigence, telling Reuters on Tuesday the Islamic Republic is not living up to multiple commitments under the landmark nuclear accord.



"We have insisted and despite all our efforts we have not been able to get that [access], ..."

Iran Caught Hiding Nuclear Work, Sparking Call for Full Sanctions 'Snapback'





As I have always said, there were never meant to be any inspections.

=============================================================









"Americans and Israelis who hate the new nuclear agreement with Iran are already focusing on one part in particular: It doesn’t authorize snap, no-notice inspections of all locations. Israel’s hard-right Education Minister Naftali Bennett claims the accord is a “farce” because “in order to go and make an inspection, you have to notify the Iranians 24 days in advance.”



This is not exactly right, but close enough. (Iran’s declared nuclear sites will be under continuous monitoring. If the International Atomic Energy Agency wants to inspect a non-declared site and Iran refuses, Iran has 14 days to convince the IAEA it’s doing nothing wrong without providing access. If it can’t, the commission governing the agreement has seven days to vote on whether to force Iran to provide access, and if it does Iran has three more days to comply. The exact procedure is established in paragraphs 74-78 of the agreement text.)"

Why Is Iran’s Refusal to Allow No-Notice Inspections Legit? U.S. History With Iraq



==============================================



“Particularly troublesome, you have to wait 24 days before you can inspect.”

–Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), speaking to reporters about the international nuclear agreement with Iran, Aug. 10, 2015

“At non-designated sites it will take 24 days to get an inspection.”

–Schumer, speaking to reporters, Aug. 11

=======================================================




" The prime minister exhorted International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano to “go and inspect this atomic warehouse immediately,” before Iran hides its contents.

A week later, however, the IAEA rejected his suggestion. In a statement, the agency said, “All information obtained, including from third parties, is subject to rigorous review and assessed together with other available information to arrive at an independent assessment based on the agency’s own expertise.”

This wasn’t the first time the IAEA failed to investigate possible Iranian violations discovered by Israeli intelligence. "

... at least twice the IAEA has acknowledged it was not verifying compliance."
What the IAEA doesn't know — or want to know — about Iran’s nuclear program

==============================================================



Proof of the lack of inspections is right here:

“Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade

Another secret nuclear facility is revealed as Iran continues to push its nuclear program forward.

… Netanyahu’s press conference came hours after the International Atomic Energy Agency revealed that it found traces of uranium from Iran’s secret atomic warehouse.

This latest information comes a year and a half after Netanyahu first revealed Iran’s secret nuclear archive, which exposed Iran’s plan to develop five nuclear warheads as early as 2003. It also comes a year after he exposed an Iranian secret nuclear warehouse in Tehran and asked the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect the site, where he claimed Iran had once stored 33 pounds of radioactive material, which it disguised as rug cleaner. In April, Reuters reported that the agency had inspected the site and took samples for analysis.

A few hours before Netanyahu’s speech, the International Atomic Energy Agency announced the discovery of traces of uranium from the sample taken at the Tehran warehouse, the same element Iran is enriching and one of the only two fissile elements with which it is possible to develop a nuclear bomb.

Netanyahu responded to the discovery by calling it a direct violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. He also showed satellite images of the warehouse, which illustrate that Iran literally covered it up with gravel.” Netanyahu Exposes Iran’s Nuclear Facade
It was a bad agreement for the beginning. We said it years ago. And let me tell you a few examples about why it is a bad agreement. You cannot inspect the facilities. You have to let them know in advance if you want to come to inspect the military facilities. It's a joke. They continue with a ballistic missile program. Prime Minister Netanyahu exposed documents that we found in Tehran and we showed it to the world that they're continuing with their ballistic missile program. Third, is the issue of the expiration date. What will happen in five, six, seven years and the most important the President has talk about it is the funding. Today they have a lot of funding and they put into their military and sponsoring their proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. They're using that money that they're getting from the Europeans to sponsor terrorism all over the world. Rep. Michael McCaul on Iran deal flaws, immigration policy

==============================================================================









Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

US secretary of state calls blocking of UN official from nuclear site an ‘unwarranted act of intimidation,’ says alarmed by Tehran’s ‘lack of adequate cooperation’

Pompeo slams Iran’s ‘intimidation’ of IAEA inspector as ‘outrageous’

================================================================

“Israel's Iran documents show nuclear deal 'was built on lies'

The new secretary of state said the documents were proof "beyond any doubt" that "the Iranian regime was not telling the truth".

"Iran hid a vast atomic archive from the world and from the IAEA - until today," Mr Pompeo added.” Israel's Iran documents show nuclear deal 'was built on lies'

======================================================

“After Israel’s Netanyahu unveiled 100,000 files proving the existence of Iran’s secret nuclear weapons program, the Iran Deal’s defenders insisted that they had always known that Iran was lying.

Transparency and serious inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites: two things that the Iran Deal doesn’t have.

The first thing the Iran Deal did was lock away gobs of information, including about its own side deals. The IAEA’s inspections and Joint Commission’s proceedings are secret. The IAEA puts out information, like the number of inspections, but without specific locations, they have no context or meaning.

“The most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever,” Obama called it, “The most robust inspections and verification regime that we’ve ever had,” Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Iran echo chamber coordinator, claimed. And now it’s even more robust. “FACT: the #IranDeal mandates the most robust nuclear inspections ever peacefully negotiated,” Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz tweeted.

FACT: Obama, Rhodes and Moniz had already been caught lying about the Iran Deal. All you had to do was listen to the words coming out of their mouths at various times and compare them to each other.

“It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb,” Obama claimed of the deal. But he had also admitted that it would give Iran a zero breakout time to a bomb. Both statements can’t be true.

“Under this deal you will have anywhere, anytime 24⁄7 access,” Ben Rhodes told CNN. A few months later, he also told CNN, “We never sought in this negotiation the capacity for so-called anytime, anywhere where you could basically go anywhere in the country.”

Moniz, whom the Iran Deal echo chamber trotted out as their expert, didn’t just lie to the media. He had already been caught lying to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee when he claimed that Iran would only be allowed to keep “only 300 kilograms of low (3.67 percent) enriched uranium hexafluoride, and will not exceed this level for fifteen years.”

The truth was that a secret exemption allowed Iran to stockpile “unknown quantities” of LEU.

In 2015, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano announced that the IAEA had inspected the Parchin site, a likely home of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. Here’s how the incredibly robust inspection process went, according to Amano. “The Agency has, in certain circumstances, permitted States’ representatives to carry out activities in support of the Agency’s verification work… In the case of Parchin, the Iranian side played a part in the sample-taking process by swiping samples.”

What that actually meant was that the Iranians took the samples and gave them to the IAEA.

According to Iran’s atomic spokesman, the samples were collected “in the absence of the inspectors affiliated to the International Atomic Energy Agency.”

Frontpagemag

========================================================





I never lie....and you're going to help prove it: there are no inspections:


1. Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!


No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.



2. "The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections



3. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



4. § The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was not allowed to inspect or monitor Iran's military sites where nuclear activities were most likely being carried out. Among the many concessions that the Obama administration gave the Iranian government, one was accepting the Iranian leaders' demand that these military sites would be out of the IAEA's reach.

§ Due to this surrender, various high-profile Iranian sites such as the Parchin military complex, located southeast of Tehran, were free to engage in nuclear activities without the risk of inspection.

§ Once the authoritarian, anti-Semitic and anti-American government of Iran possess a nuclear bomb, no amount of actions will be able reverse the catastrophe.

§ Stop Iran From Going Nuclear




5. In 2015, President Obama promised when he tried to sell the deal to a skeptical American public that the Iranians agreed to the "most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime, ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history," based on "unprecedented verification." Moreover, Obama adviser Ben Rhodes reassured the public repeatedly that the deal included "anywhere, anytime" inspections and 24-7 access to Iran's key nuclear facilities.

But in reality, the administration repeatedly lied to the American public by misrepresenting the deal and the nature of the inspections Iran agreed to. The robust inspections referred only to Iran's declared nuclear sites. Other sites that the IAEA has suspicions about, including all military sites and undeclared nuclear sites, fell under a separate cheating-friendly procedure.

One of the most controversial issues in the 2015 negotiations was whether the U.N.'s IAEA would be able to visit military sites if they had questions about suspected nuclear activities or facilities within them. In the end, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khamenei on June 23, 2015 stated that granting access to Iran's military sites was a red line, and the U.S. and its partners gave in and agreed on language with Iran avoiding a direct mention of the military sites issue.

Instead, the deal stated that in order to allay IAEA concerns, Iran would give access within a 24-day time frame, after the IAEA made a request to visit a suspected site. Furthermore, the deal stated that if Iran refused the access, the Islamist state and the IAEA would have additional 14 days to resolve the agreement among themselves. If they failed to agree, a joint commission comprising the six member-nations who are parties to the agreement would consider the matter for an additional week.

In conclusion, according to the agreement, Iran can continue its uranium enrichment program and continue developing its weapon program at its many military sites, and every time the IAEA suspects anything, the Iranians can have 24 days at a minimum and 45 days maximum to delay the access, sanitize the sites, or transfer the unauthorized nuclear work to another unauthorized military site.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/05/obama_and_irans_nuclear_lies.html#ixzz5nH0Ua9im




Bet you feel pretty stooooooopid right now, huh?

===========================================================

“Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.” Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

• 
  
• 
  
• Anyone who maintains that Iran is living up to the agreement is a bald-faced liar!!!

No one knows, no one can tell…..because the deal prevents actual inspections.





"The deal's provisions for inspections of military facilities, or "undeclared sites," involve a complex process with plenty of opportunities for Iran to stall. Tehran can propose alternatives to on-site inspections, or reject the request, which would trigger a 24-day process for the Joint Commission countries to override the rejection.

That could drag on for months. And under ambiguities built into the deal, it's unclear whether Iran must allow IAEA inspectors into military sites, or whether the Iranians can take their own environmental samples and send them to the IAEA for testing, as was allowed under a 2015 side agreement that let Iran use its own experts to inspect the Parchin military site."
U.S. seeks to test Iran deal with more inspections





3. The starting point is the fact that no Liberal/Democrat has been able to answer this question successfully:
What possible benefit is there to America, or to the world, in awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


Contrary to the flaccid argument that Iran is in compliance with the agreement….and no matter who says it…..there is no way to know. The 7th century savages have a built-in dodge: Iran has 14 day to say whether to allow inspections asked for, and actually has the ability to delay any inspections up to 24 days.
There is no way of ascertaining whether or not Iran is adhering to the terms.

What sort of moron would on our side would sign that sort of deal???




There are no inspections and when requested, the savages can stall for 24 days.


Hence, the deal is a fraud to give the Iranians nuclear weapons.


"Obama's Unforgivable Betrayal

The president's nuclear accommodation of radical Islamist theocrats threatens Israel's survival.
[Obama] is no longer trying to stop Iran from going nuclear. “Never” has been slimmed down to 13 years – at best!"
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/arti...ar-deal-is-an-unforgivable-betrayal-of-israel


2. Obama's Iran Nuclear Deal Allows the Regime to Develop a Weapon ...
"Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon"
Read more at: Krauthammer’s Take: Obama ‘Caved’ on Inspections, Now Iran Is Developing a Nuclear Weapon



3. "...Obama had previously stated that “the deal we’ll accept” with Iran “is that they end their nuclear program” and abide by the U.N. resolutions that have been in place. Yet more enrichment will continue with 5,000 centrifuges per decade and all restraints will end in 15 years.

.... none of Iran’s nuclear facilities, including the Fordow center will be closed, as The Washington Post noted. Not one of the country’s 19,000 centrifuges will be dismantled. Tehran’s existing pile of enriched uranium will be “reduced” but not necessarily shipped out of the country. In effect, then, Iran’s nuclear infrastructure will remain intact ....." https://www.usnews.com/opinion/arti...ar-deal-is-an-unforgivable-betrayal-of-israel

 

[Colin norris]

1. This is a complete and total lie and it negates reading any further in yet another piece of lying builds from the most obvious Russian troll on the board.

Iran is now weeks away from a nuclear weapon thanks to Donald Trump.

Old chicky babe has some identity issues. She likes to see her name in print, plagairises everything then runs away when challenged. Very bitter and hate filled.