There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?

No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.

Edit: I just copied this from the link below.
“We are so proud of what the #WalkAway Campaign has done to address the divide in our country's political landscape. In fact, what began as a social media movement has grown to such proportions that we filed to become a 501c3 nonprofit foundation in late December 2018 and were awarded our IRS determination in August 2019.”

 
Last edited:
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.



You have about 12 or 15 people making videos and traveling around the country claiming to be the Walk Away movement. I have yet to see anyone that wasn't part of that core group. That's kinda odd, don't you think?
 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.

Edit: I just copied this from the link below.
“We are so proud of what the #WalkAway Campaign has done to address the divide in our country's political landscape. In fact, what began as a social media movement has grown to such proportions that we filed to become a 501c3 nonprofit foundation in late December 2018 and were awarded our IRS determination in August 2019.”


How many people did it require to file those papers?
 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.



You have about 12 or 15 people making videos and traveling around the country claiming to be the Walk Away movement. I have yet to see anyone that wasn't part of that core group. That's kinda odd, don't you think?

Really? Search a little. Here, for example. Just keep clicking more when you scroll to the bottom of each page.

 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.

Edit: I just copied this from the link below.
“We are so proud of what the #WalkAway Campaign has done to address the divide in our country's political landscape. In fact, what began as a social media movement has grown to such proportions that we filed to become a 501c3 nonprofit foundation in late December 2018 and were awarded our IRS determination in August 2019.”


How many people did it require to file those papers?

Probably an attorney or two, like it does for most legal applications.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.

There is none so blind as a dumbass that refuses to see.
 
The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

In more ways than one. It will be difficult for the GOP to take back the House until 2022 (after the 2020 Census), so the important action will be at the state level to determine who controls reapportionment for the next decade.
How do you figure? People are leaving blue states in droves and blue states are on the receiving end? Liberals are not leaving NYC!
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.

There is none so blind as a dumbass that refuses to see.

You just described every "Rumpster".
 
The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

In more ways than one. It will be difficult for the GOP to take back the House until 2022 (after the 2020 Census), so the important action will be at the state level to determine who controls reapportionment for the next decade.

The Census has no impact on state districts.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.

There is none so blind as a dumbass that refuses to see.

You just described every "Rumpster".

No, I just described the dumbass in this conversation and it is not me.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
It means that GOPs don't expect to retake the House Majority in the 2020 election.

I think it's just the opposite. These are tired, old RINOS getting while the getting's good and leaving openings for fresh, young conservatives, many of them vets.
The issue is Repubs have been removing RINOS for several election cycles and new ones crop up.


And Lose in the election. 2018 showed that the "Party of the Rump" is in serious peril. And it's just gotten worse. Those that you call RINOS are the real republicans. YOU are the real "JBS" or better knows as "The Party of the Rump". The sooner you are gone the better. Rump isn't the problem, he's just a symptom. You don't want to work with the rest of us, fine. Just don't complain when your "The Party of the Rump" is shown the door and the Republican Party has to rebuild from the embarrassment.

Your lack of knowledge of history is only exceeded by everything else, you incredible dumbass. Look at midterm elections throughout history.
 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.



You have about 12 or 15 people making videos and traveling around the country claiming to be the Walk Away movement. I have yet to see anyone that wasn't part of that core group. That's kinda odd, don't you think?
Anyone of a core group walked away in 2016.
 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.



You have about 12 or 15 people making videos and traveling around the country claiming to be the Walk Away movement. I have yet to see anyone that wasn't part of that core group. That's kinda odd, don't you think?
Anyone of a core group walked away in 2016.
I’m not sure I understand your point but taking it at face value, I’d say yeah, it was like there was a mass migration from all quarters.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
The Republican Party controls 3/5ths of all state legislatures and governorships in the United States. That's why Soros was putting so much $$$ into state attorney general races so Democrats can steal elections.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.
The American people can see his leadership during this "virus thing" and take one look at lost Joe Biden and they can thank God his stupid ass is not President right now. The only people criticizing OUR President is the liberal media propaganda machine and pin heads who believe what they say. It's why they were so shocked in 2016 when Trump won because they live in an alternate universe and a media bubble. There are millions in the vast silent majority who support Trump and they live outside large metropolitan areas which is where these polls come from.
 
Last edited:
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
It means that GOPs don't expect to retake the House Majority in the 2020 election.

I think it's just the opposite. These are tired, old RINOS getting while the getting's good and leaving openings for fresh, young conservatives, many of them vets.
The issue is Repubs have been removing RINOS for several election cycles and new ones crop up.


And Lose in the election. 2018 showed that the "Party of the Rump" is in serious peril. And it's just gotten worse. Those that you call RINOS are the real republicans. YOU are the real "JBS" or better knows as "The Party of the Rump". The sooner you are gone the better. Rump isn't the problem, he's just a symptom. You don't want to work with the rest of us, fine. Just don't complain when your "The Party of the Rump" is shown the door and the Republican Party has to rebuild from the embarrassment.

Your lack of knowledge of history is only exceeded by everything else, you incredible dumbass. Look at midterm elections throughout history.

What is showed was the close calls that got Rumps help all failed. Every single one of them. Rump is going to be a pariah this year
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.
The American people can see his leadership during this "virus thing" and take one look at lost Joe Biden and they can thank God his stupid ass is not President right now. The only people criticizing OUR President is the liberal media propaganda machine and pin heads who believe what they say. It's why they were so shocked in 2016 when Trump won because they live in an alternate universe and a media bubble. There are millions in the vast silent majority who support Trump and they live outside large metropolitan areas which is where these polls come from.

Because you say so. Fine. Just crown Rump for Life. Forget about elections.
 
So what do we know about these recent retirees other than the majority of them are from safe Republican districts? Well, age could have played a role in many of these departures. Combined, these seven retirees share about 150 years of experience in the House and Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, for instance, is the second-longest serving House member, having first been elected in 1978. But only two — King (75) and Sensenbrenner (76) — are actually older than 70. The others are still in their early-to-mid 60s, which isn’t that far off from 58, which is the average age of a congressional member in the 116th Congress. In fact, because Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois, Mac Thornberry of Texas and Greg Walden of Oregon are all still in their early 60s, the relatively young age of these retirees reinforces the idea that Republicans might have misgivings about winning back the House.

The article suggests that these retirements came about because they felt the GOP cannot win back the House in 2020. And, it’s my guess they’re Never Trumpers who know the president won’t support their reelection.

So, the question is: Will the RNC come up with viable, pro-Trump candidates for these positions? And, will they be able to beat the leftists the DNC and people like George Soros will put up to take their seats?

And, finally, will enough independents support the president to help elect his people to these and other seats?

The future of the country is going to be decided in 2020.

More of this @ There Are Now 18 House Republicans Retiring. What Does This Mean For 2020?
Means we will find out how deep Trump's coattails are in 2020.

His coat tails showed quite a bit of wear in 2018. And after the Virus thing, I don't see it getting better.
The American people can see his leadership during this "virus thing" and take one look at lost Joe Biden and they can thank God his stupid ass is not President right now. The only people criticizing OUR President is the liberal media propaganda machine and pin heads who believe what they say. It's why they were so shocked in 2016 when Trump won because they live in an alternate universe and a media bubble. There are millions in the vast silent majority who support Trump and they live outside large metropolitan areas which is where these polls come from.

Because you say so. Fine. Just crown Rump for Life. Forget about elections.
Nope. Trump likes winning.
 
No one knows. All we have to do is look at all the polls over the past several years to realize even the so called professionals haven’t a clue. However, I wrote to the DNC some months ago telling them I had had enough and that I would never be voting for anyone with a D by their name again. Their party needs to be removed from power, too many wannabe socialists and tyrants.

You never were a Democrat.

You know what? You don’t know me. So you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I was a registered Democrat and voted for Carter (in retrospect, I believe that was a mistake). I have voted for independent candidates, a number of Libertarian ones (Andre Marrou was the only presidential candidate I have ever been enthusiastic about) and republican ones since the democratic wing has gone off the cliff. I was registered in Maryland as a Libertarian until this election cycle and switched to Republican because the L party did not get enough representation in the state.

You should learn the difference between knowledge and belief and stick to what you actually know.

So, your pathetic ass voted for Jimmy Carter in 1976 or 1980 and never voted Democratic since then and you consider that being a Democratic Party member?

And being libertarian just means you're a selfish bastard. Can you point to one country that has successful used that greedy economic model with any success.


I know your type.

There you go again, being an arrogant know it all and in fact knowing nothing. I was a registered Democrat for a number of years. I also voted for McGovern but Carter was the only democrat I ever voted for that won. You don’t know my type because all you know of me is a few typed comments in a forum. I realize it’s probably difficult for you but try not to be so obtuse. There’s an entire movement called WalkAway that consists of people fed up with and leaving the Democratic Party.

Regarding the Libertarian party, learn what it is about. It’s about liberty, the ability to do, think, read, say, be, think anything you want unless and until it infringes those same rights in others. If you think the 2 parties we have now are that wonderful, it is you who is the pathetic ass. Crawl back under your rock and eat crow.

The entire WalkAway movement exists only in the minds of wishful right wingers. Otherwise, nobody has ever seen any sign of that so called movement.

Ha! Continue deluding yourself. Go to their site and have a look. Is it a movement sweeping the country in large numbers? No, probably not. Is it a movement? Duh, yeah.



You have about 12 or 15 people making videos and traveling around the country claiming to be the Walk Away movement. I have yet to see anyone that wasn't part of that core group. That's kinda odd, don't you think?
Anyone of a core group walked away in 2016.
I’m not sure I understand your point but taking it at face value, I’d say yeah, it was like there was a mass migration from all quarters.
The core group that walked away from Democratic Party was former industrial workers from the Rust Belt states. With the union and their jobs gone, why vote for a party that supports abortion and is anti 2nd Amendment...and nominated a candidate that went to West Virginia and Ohio to tell coal miners she was going to put them out of work?
 

Forum List

Back
Top