The Wuhan Fraud: The Truth Sneaks Out

[citygator]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

 

[daveman]

Did media censorship of stories harmful to Biden sway the election?

To measure the true effect of the media’s censorship on the election, the Media Research Center asked The Polling Company to survey 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin), six of which (all but North Carolina) were called for Biden (survey details below). We tested these voters’ knowledge of eight news stories — all important topics that our ongoing analysis had shown the liberal news media had failed to cover properly. We found that a huge majority (82%) of Biden voters were unaware of at least one of these key items, with five percent saying they were unaware of all eight of the issues we tested.

This lack of information proved crucial: One of every six Biden voters we surveyed (17%) said they would have abandoned the Democratic candidate had they known the facts about one or more of these news stories. A shift of this magnitude would have changed the outcome in all six of the swing states won by Joe Biden, and Donald Trump would have comfortably won a second term as president.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

"This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years."


False.

You were and are a sucker for the scam....

You might as well admit it, as it can't possibly do damage to your non-existent reputation.

Everyone who has had to suffer through your nonsense posts knows you will never say anything not authorized by your masters.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



"As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie

Now....try to pull your head out of that dark and remote location.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

1. I have posited that, as Trump's greatest asset in the campaign has been his miraculous economy, after Hussein 'masterminded' the slowest recovery in history, and the answer to this by the party of evil is to organize a nationwide shutdown of the economy through lock-downs, riots, and closing schools to keep parents from going back to work.

It is looking like suckers bought it like it was on sale, and it worked.

2. "Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S. Deleted After Publication
Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.



3. ... critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.

According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Wait, what? Really?



4. That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.

Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.

So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:



5. So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. "

UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.

Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by an article published by Johns Hopk...

pjmedia.com

It's fake news.

Of course you swallowed it whole because it supports your bias and you aren't self aware enough to question things that do.

I have no bias, you moron.
These are the facts.....you got suckered......not a particularly difficult endeavor.



This is simply the seasonal flu blown up by the Democrats and the media.
Every death was claimed due to the Chinese virus......it was a lie from the get-go.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry

Unfortunately for you your facts on history are indeed biased because you consider your warped OPINIONS as facts and they don’t go along with what actually happened like your lies that Reagan was the greatest president of the twentieth century when he was actually much more like the most corrupt,or your dismissal of the facts when you go off on your babble thst Obama was corrupt thst you omit the facts how he was just contiuning the corruption that your hero Bush got started.

you indeed have a bias towards the gop party refusing to admit their party is every bit as corrupt as the demorats sre,that you have earned the reputation where most posters laugh at you here at this site so it does not matter that the rare times that you DO tell the truth like this time that the covid deaths are inflated with those links you gave,people point out the obvious about you,your biased towards the gop party and always ignoring their corruption.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

"This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years."


False.

You were and are a sucker for the scam....

You might as well admit it, as it can't possibly do damage to your non-existent reputation.

Everyone who has had to suffer through your nonsense posts knows you will never say anything not authorized by your masters.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



"As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie

Now....try to pull your head out of that dark and remote location.

God I hate having to give one of USMBs most major biggest trolls here a thumbs up especially sense most posters laugh at her over her bias towards the gop party the fact she does the same thing with them that the Biden lovers do,turn the other cheek when facts of vote fraud and inflated deaths don’t go their way,especially sense she has never come to grips with reality on Reagan or bush being no differerent than Obama but I got to give her credit where credit is due,this is the ONE topic she is actually objective and non biased on,well two actually.the massive vote fraud that took place against trump.

If she would dedicate herself to being objective and non biased about eveything else thst took place in history instead of posting Bible length babble and propaganda her whole miserable life,then much more people around here would take serious instead of laughing at her as they do everyday.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. Alabama football coach tests positive…..so?







Nick Saban spoke to reporters on the weekly SEC coaches teleconference Wednesday morning shortly after the school announced he had tested positive again for COVID-19.

The school added Saban was experiencing mild symptoms and it will not be viewed as a potential false positive test.

Here is everything Saban, who sounded somewhat congested, said on the teleconference:

“I don’t really have any cardinal signs of the virus right now. I don’t have a fever. No loss of taste or smell. No fatigue. No muscle aches.”
What Saban said about COVID positive, missing Iron Bowl



'Tests positive' is how you recognize that it is a scam.

The only significant number is the mortality rate from the Wuhan.

And.....there, essentially is no such number:
The number of deaths from the Wuhan is no more than a rounding error.

Hill reporter Joe Consha said the following on Fox. 10/6:

"The CDC said that between the ages of zero and 19, 99.97% of people survive the Wuhan.

....between 20 and 45, 99.98%

....between 50 and 65, 99.5%

....and over 70, about 95%.

The chance of dying from the Wuhan Red Death is about.....zero.



Sooo ask yourself why the number reported is 'infections,' those positive tests, many of which are false positives.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oh and folks the ONLY reason she is objective and non biased here on the covid deaths being inflated same as she is on the rigged election,is because trump is gop. If trump wad a democrat,then she would be siding with all these other idiot clowns like gator boy and denying reality saying there was no vote fraud and she knows it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

1. I have posited that, as Trump's greatest asset in the campaign has been his miraculous economy, after Hussein 'masterminded' the slowest recovery in history, and the answer to this by the party of evil is to organize a nationwide shutdown of the economy through lock-downs, riots, and closing schools to keep parents from going back to work.

It is looking like suckers bought it like it was on sale, and it worked.

2. "Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S. Deleted After Publication
Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.



3. ... critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.

According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Wait, what? Really?



4. That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.

Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.

So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:



5. So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. "

UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.

Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by an article published by Johns Hopk...

pjmedia.com

It's fake news.

Of course you swallowed it whole because it supports your bias and you aren't self aware enough to question things that do.

Where the fuck is your support for your dumbassed statement.

This isn't a John Hopkins study ?

Pray tell....where is your link, shithead.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

1. I have posited that, as Trump's greatest asset in the campaign has been his miraculous economy, after Hussein 'masterminded' the slowest recovery in history, and the answer to this by the party of evil is to organize a nationwide shutdown of the economy through lock-downs, riots, and closing schools to keep parents from going back to work.

It is looking like suckers bought it like it was on sale, and it worked.

2. "Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S. Deleted After Publication
Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception has been directly challenged by a study published by Johns Hopkins University on Sunday, November 22.



3. ... critically analyzed the impact that COVID-19 had on U.S. deaths. According to her, the impact of COVID-19 on deaths in the United States can be fully understood by comparing it to the number of total deaths in the country.

According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

Wait, what? Really?



4. That’s what it says. And, it should come as no surprise that not long after the study was published it was deleted within days.

Luckily, a back-up copy remains on The Wayback Machine, and we can still read the study.

So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:



5. So, how exactly did the study conclude that COVID-19 has had “relatively no effect on deaths”? Here’s how the study made this determination:
Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same. "

UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.

Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by an article published by Johns Hopk...

pjmedia.com

It's fake news.

Of course you swallowed it whole because it supports your bias and you aren't self aware enough to question things that do.

I have no bias, you moron.
These are the facts.....you got suckered......not a particularly difficult endeavor.



This is simply the seasonal flu blown up by the Democrats and the media.
Every death was claimed due to the Chinese virus......it was a lie from the get-go.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry

He's a fucking hack from the sewers of Wichita.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

In other words, we don't like what she said because it fucks our view of the world.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Oh and folks the ONLY reason she is objective and non biased here on the covid deaths being inflated same as she is on the rigged election,is because trump is gop. If trump wad a democrat,then she would be siding with all these other idiot clowns like gator boy and denying reality saying there was no vote fraud and she knows it.

Who are you talking about ?

Who is she.

 

[Kondor3]

Johns Hopkins University itself repudiated the study...

They give their reasons here...

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

In other words, we don't like what she said because it fucks our view of the world.

If this was coming from a couple other posters around here thst have credibilty like yourself, I would understand them not believing her because she hss no more credibility than they do as I exposed in post number# 24 on here,as I said,most posters here laugh at her because her posts are almost always propaganda and she omits facts because she has an obvious bias towards the gop party as I proved.I guarantee you if trump was a democrat,she would be saying the same crap these two trolls have said the last four years saying it was russia collusion. She will never admit that truth of course.Look how she always dodges bush’s corruption.

but in this rare case she is being objective sense it is a gop involved and actually telling the truth so your post is so spot on about them.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oh and folks the ONLY reason she is objective and non biased here on the covid deaths being inflated same as she is on the rigged election,is because trump is gop. If trump wad a democrat,then she would be siding with all these other idiot clowns like gator boy and denying reality saying there was no vote fraud and she knows it.

Who are you talking about ?

Who is she.

The op,the thread starter,you must not know her history because the objective non biased that have been here for a long time,most here laugh at her everyday because she has a bias towards the gop party,she ignores that for decadesnow it’s always been a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.

she ignores how until this last year,the gop was as evil and corrupt as the dem party is and has been for decades,I have checkmated her too many times to remember that the gop party is o differerent than the dems but because my facts don’t go along with her warped opinions,she ignores them as she does with anybody who comes on here and exposes the corruption of the gop party.

she will always lie that I did not take her to school in posts #24.

I wish this thread had been done by someone like you instead of her,someone that does not lie all the time how the dem party is corrupt but the gop can do no wrong,that bullshit.

 

[keepitreal]

It's fake news.

Of course you swallowed it whole because it supports your bias and you aren't self aware enough to question things that do.

From left to right...
This shows the last 2 wks of 2019 through wk 45 2020

Starting from the left, the numbers in the column highlighted
with red to the left, yellow to the right, are total deaths

The next column is Pneumonia deaths, next to that, Influenza deaths,
next to that, Covid deaths, the last column is the total of all three, PIC

If you look at wk 51, 2019, at the very top, these are the numbers...

Pneumonia deaths, 3390
Influenza deaths, 129
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=3519 [3390+129+0=3519]

Wk 52, 2019

Pneumonia deaths, 3538
Influenza deaths, 203
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=3741 [3538+203+0=3741]

Now, if you'll jump to Week 6, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3799
Influenza deaths, 520
Covid deaths, 1
PIC=4320 [3799+520+1=4320]

Week 7, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3827
Influenza deaths, 560
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=4387 [3827+560+0=4387]

Week 8, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3697
Influenza deaths, 566
Covid deaths, 5
PIC=4267

WRONG!

3697+566+5=4268

Let's remove 1 death from the Covid column

Let's jump to Week 14

Pneumonia deaths, 9899
Influenza deaths, 477
Covid deaths, 10,012
PIC=15405

WRONG!

9899+477+10,012=20,388

So, I'm going to subtract the wrong sum they gave
from the right sum

20,388-15,405=4,983

Now, I subtract 4,983 from the Covid deaths,
10,012-4,983=5,029

There were only 5,029 Covid deaths

EVERY SINGLE COMPUTATION WITH COVID IS INCORRECT
NOT TO MENTION INFLUENZA SUDDENLY DIED OUT
NOR DO DEATH TOTALS FROM ONE WEEK TO THE NEXT LINE UP

WEEKS AGO IT WAS 259,000 DEATHS FROM COVID, NOW ITS 250,000

THESE PHONY ASS WUHAN KUNG FLU AVIAN INFLUENZA NUMBERS
ARE AS LEGITIMATE AS BIDENS VOTE TOTALS

You and your ilk are so fucking ignorant and intellectually challenged
yous are ignorant of the true scope and depth of your own ignorance
and It's a good thing for you bozos...otherwise, you'd all kill yourselves in embarrassment

 

[LA RAM FAN]

As you just saw Sun Devil 92 i gave her credit where credit was due and thst is because for the first time ever at usmb,she finally was objective and non biased and went by facts instead of her warped opinions,almost always she does the opposite trolls and evades facts as those other two clown posters sense they don’t go along with her warped opinions.just ask any of the long time e posters here that are not on her following list.lol

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It's fake news.

Of course you swallowed it whole because it supports your bias and you aren't self aware enough to question things that do.

View attachment 422288

From left to right...
This shows the last 2 wks of 2019 through wk 45 2020

Starting from the left, the numbers in the column highlighted
with red to the left, yellow to the right, are total deaths

The next column is Pneumonia deaths, next to that, Influenza deaths,
next to that, Covid deaths, the last column is the total of all three, PIC

If you look at wk 51, 2019, at the very top, these are the numbers...

Pneumonia deaths, 3390
Influenza deaths, 129
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=3519 [3390+129+0=3519]

Wk 52, 2019

Pneumonia deaths, 3538
Influenza deaths, 203
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=3741 [3538+203+0=3741]

Now, if you'll jump to Week 6, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3799
Influenza deaths, 520
Covid deaths, 1
PIC=4320 [3799+520+1=4320]

Week 7, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3827
Influenza deaths, 560
Covid deaths, 0
PIC=4387 [3827+560+0=4387]

Week 8, 2020

Pneumonia deaths, 3697
Influenza deaths, 566
Covid deaths, 5
PIC=4267

WRONG!

3697+566+5=4268

Let's remove 1 death from the Covid column

Let's jump to Week 14

Pneumonia deaths, 9899
Influenza deaths, 477
Covid deaths, 10,012
PIC=15405

WRONG!

9899+477+10,012=20,388

So, I'm going to subtract the wrong sum they gave
from the right sum

20,388-15,405=4,983

Now, I subtract 4,983 from the Covid deaths,
10,012-4,983=5,029

There were only 5,029 Covid deaths

EVERY SINGLE COMPUTATION WITH COVID IS INCORRECT
NOT TO MENTION INFLUENZA SUDDENLY DIED OUT
NOR DO DEATH TOTALS FROM ONE WEEK TO THE NEXT LINE UP

WEEKS AGO IT WAS 259,000 DEATHS FROM COVID, NOW ITS 250,000

THESE PHONY ASS WUHAN KUNG FLU AVIAN INFLUENZA NUMBERS
ARE AS LEGITIMATE AS BIDENS VOTE TOTALS

You and your ilk are so fucking ignorant and intellectually challenged
yous are ignorant of the true scope and depth of your own ignorance
and It's a good thing for you bozos...otherwise, you'd all kill yourselves in embarrassment

This assclown is not worth the effort.He is a shill that has penetrated this site,best to put him on ignore,that’s where I have had him for a couple years now,he defends government corruption no matter how absurd it is,that just proves right there about his desire for truth and what his real agenda here is.

 

[citygator]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

"This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years."


False.

You were and are a sucker for the scam....

You might as well admit it, as it can't possibly do damage to your non-existent reputation.

Everyone who has had to suffer through your nonsense posts knows you will never say anything not authorized by your masters.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



"As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie

Now....try to pull your head out of that dark and remote location.

All I did was copy and post the note from the link you posted... it was your link. How ignorant do you have to be to not know what is in your own link? JH retracted the article becaus it was poorly researched and being used by trolls for a misinformation campaign.

So follow the logic here.. you trusted the paper because it was published by John Hopkins. That was the source YOU chose. Then the source YOU chose deleted the article because of the listed shortcomings. So YOU trusted their opinion until you didn’t? What a blind religious zealot you are turning into. Your point is without merit, illogical, and dispatched.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

"This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years."


False.

You were and are a sucker for the scam....

You might as well admit it, as it can't possibly do damage to your non-existent reputation.

Everyone who has had to suffer through your nonsense posts knows you will never say anything not authorized by your masters.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



"As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie

Now....try to pull your head out of that dark and remote location.

All I did was copy and post the note from the link you posted... it was your link. How ignorant do you have to be to not know what is in your own link? JH retracted the article becaus it was poorly researched and being used by trolls for a misinformation campaign.

So follow the logic here.. you trusted the paper because it was published by John Hopkins. That was the source YOU chose. Then the source YOU chose deleted the article because of the listed shortcomings. So YOU trusted their opinion until you didn’t? What a blind religious zealot you are turning into. Your point is without merit, illogical, and dispatched.

Briand was quoted in the article as saying, “All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers.” This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years. According to the CDC, there have been almost 300,000 excess deaths due to COVID-19. Additionally, Briand presented data of total U.S. deaths in comparison to COVID-19-related deaths as a proportion percentage, which trivializes the repercussions of the pandemic. This evidence does not disprove the severity of COVID-19; an increase in excess deaths is not represented in these proportionalities because they are offered as percentages, not raw numbers.

Briand also claimed in her analysis that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may be incorrectly categorized as COVID-19-related deaths. However, COVID-19 disproportionately affects those with preexisting conditions, so those with those underlying conditions are statistically more likely to be severely affected and die from the virus.

Because of these inaccuracies and our failure to provide additional information about the effects of COVID-19, The News-Letter decided to retract this article. It is our duty as a publication to combat the spread of misinformation and to enhance our fact-checking process. We apologize to our readers.

A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

Editor’s Note: After The News-Letter published this article on Nov. 22, it was brought to our attention that our coverage of Genevieve Briand’s presentation “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data” has been used to support dangerous inaccuracies that minimize the impact of the pandemic.

www.jhunewsletter.com

"This claim is incorrect and does not take into account the spike in raw death count from all causes compared to previous years."


False.

You were and are a sucker for the scam....

You might as well admit it, as it can't possibly do damage to your non-existent reputation.

Everyone who has had to suffer through your nonsense posts knows you will never say anything not authorized by your masters.


I don't know what mistaken point you are advancing, but the facts are:
1. No one (nearly) dies if they have just the Wuhan
2. The inflated 'cases' number is of no significance, the mortality rate is
3. Masks are inconsequential, except as an indication of fealty to the Democrat Party
4. If there is a Trump concession, I doubt we will continue to hear about a lock-down.
5. From the start......the Left forced every death to be falsely attributed to the Wuhan.

“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Certifiers should include as much detail as possible based on their knowledge of the case, medical records, laboratory testing, etc.,” the guidance continued.
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
Is The Number of Deaths Due To COVID-19 Being Inflated, And, If So, Why? | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry



"As we have yet to reach the total death rate reported in 2019 for the same time period (January 1st and April 9th), it appears that there is something seriously wrong with the way this pandemic has been reported and handled by the medical community, the media, and the politicians.

Pathetically, it most likely isn’t going to get better when as of April 8, 2020, all patients with coronavirus are now being classified as “Death due to COVID-19,” regardless of the real cause of death. This draconian method of manipulating data to conform to your hypothesis is pure evil. It allows the medical community, the media, and politicians to cover up their errors, distort their miscalculations, and falsify their reports so that they can justify even further measures that will attempt to control, manipulate, and profit from those who don’t understand the importance of “statistical significance”.
Statistically Significant: Why It Makes a Difference - Tom McFie

Now....try to pull your head out of that dark and remote location.

All I did was copy and post the note from the link you posted... it was your link. How ignorant do you have to be to not know what is in your own link? JH retracted the article becaus it was poorly researched and being used by trolls for a misinformation campaign.

So follow the logic here.. you trusted the paper because it was published by John Hopkins. That was the source YOU chose. Then the source YOU chose deleted the article because of the listed shortcomings. So YOU trusted their opinion until you didn’t? What a blind religious zealot you are turning into. Your point is without merit, illogical, and dispatched.

This is what you missed from my link.....you should have it in full:

"On Thursday, Johns Hopkins University explained that they deleted the article on the study because it “was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic.”

They did not, however, challenge the accuracy of the data or its conclusions. In other words, the article was deleted because it didn’t fit the proper narrative. "

UPDATED: Johns Hopkins Retracts Article Saying COVID-19 Has 'Relatively No Effect on Deaths' in U.S.

Conventional wisdom is that COVID-19 has caused thousands of deaths in the United States and nearly 1.5 million worldwide. This perception was directly challenged by an article published by Johns Hopk...

pjmedia.com

The truth is hidden as a matter of course by those who control the dissemination of information......the Left.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Presenting data from February to September, she noted that each week, before and after the impact of the virus, “an average of over 60,000 individuals die per week. So 50,000 to 70,000 deaths per week is normal, it is to be expected.” The latest weekly report from the CDC notes that in week 46 of 2020, only “1,260” had COVID–19 “listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death.”

Comparing deaths from 2014 to 2020, Briand then demonstrated that whilst the data recorded a slight spike in 2020, there were only 11,292 more deaths than 2018. Thus the COVID spike was found to be consistent with both seasonal and historical trends.


The American Institute for Economic Research commented on the finding, saying that the “accounting error regarding Covid deaths … has caused mass hysteria and misinformed public policy. Closing down communities to fight a virus that according to the data, has had no significant contribution to total deaths, reduces our overall capacity to build a healthy society.”

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Dr. Briand concluded."

Fact checkers dispute claims made by Johns Hopkins academic

Using statistical analysis, a senior lecturer from Johns Hopkins University (JHU) has demonstrated that COVID-19 has resulted in no excess deaths, yet the university has censored the article online.

alphanewsmn.com

Nothing but a great big scam.....just like the Russia Hoax.