The weaponization of law and order

There are becoming so many that at times you get the names mixed up.

Really, according to the Right Wing, they happen rarely... but that's no excuse for you not getting your facts right.

If Obama refused to do anything, I'm supposed to believe Biden will? You seem to have a habit of blaming Obama's failures on everyone else.

Obama and Holder decided to take up the Garner case..........what did they do? Nothing, they drug their feet and left it up to Trump.

The ability of the Federal Government to take action is pretty limited. Let's not forget what happened when the Feds stepped in on the Rodney King case after the local jury acquitted the four cops. Two cops got acquitted again, and the two who were convicted got minimal terms. (30 months).

A step up from doing nothing.

And the country is still paying for that mistake.

If it was a choice between Commie Bernie and Trump in 2016, I'd have voted for Trump and so would most other sensible people. Funny thing, most of us don't want to eat our dogs and cats, which is what you get with Socialism.

Great. LOL, you prove a point I've long made. The difference between Bush/Obama/Trump/Hillary are small.
 
Why would conservatives protest? ... everything is the way they like it ... why would anyone march down the street demanding the status quo? ... that would be hypocritical ... disrupt the way things are going to demand things keep going the way they are ...

Folks paying 3% of their income in Federal taxes have no reason to protest ...

Four police officer chained a man to the ground and murdered him ... why aren't you protesting? ...


You are a fiction writer.
 
A step up from doing nothing.

actually, no, it could be worse. What if they prosecute, let's say, Darren Wilson after the County acquitted him. The first thing he has to do is put the DA for that county on the stand.

Great. LOL, you prove a point I've long made. The difference between Bush/Obama/Trump/Hillary are small.

Um, yeah, they are at where 99% of the population is at. The part of the population that doesn't want to live on a commune and eat their dogs.

I honestly think that in 2016, most of the "support" for Commie Bernie wasn't an acceptance of the crazy shit he believes, but just people not liking how Hillary strong-armed her way into the nomination.

This year, he performed worse in every contest than he did in 2016.
 
A step up from doing nothing.

actually, no, it could be worse. What if they prosecute, let's say, Darren Wilson after the County acquitted him. The first thing he has to do is put the DA for that county on the stand.

There are a ton of DA's that need to be put on the stand to explain their defense of murderous police officers.

Great. LOL, you prove a point I've long made. The difference between Bush/Obama/Trump/Hillary are small.


Um, yeah, they are at where 99% of the population is at. The part of the population that doesn't want to live on a commune and eat their dogs.

I honestly think that in 2016, most of the "support" for Commie Bernie wasn't an acceptance of the crazy shit he believes, but just people not liking how Hillary strong-armed her way into the nomination.

This year, he performed worse in every contest than he did in 2016.

Some prefer UHC over wars all over the globe. Why more do not, I do not understand.
 
There are a ton of DA's that need to be put on the stand to explain their defense of murderous police officers.

That's not going to go well for you, actually. The place to address DA's is at the Ballot Box, not Federal Court. And yes, some of them did get voted out for not pursuing rogue cops... McGinty, McCollough, Alverez.

Some prefer UHC over wars all over the globe. Why more do not, I do not understand.

First, it's not an either/or proposition. While I think we've done some dumb things in the War on Terror, uh, after 9/11, how do you NOT go after Al Qaeda? As long as we love oil and the Zionists have the political influence they have, we are going to fight wars. Sorry.

For UHC, yes, I support it. A lot of people don't. They are happy with their current insurance. They don't like subsidizing other people's unhealthy lifestyles. People thought the ACA was going too far, not that it didn't go far enough.
 
There are a ton of DA's that need to be put on the stand to explain their defense of murderous police officers.

That's not going to go well for you, actually. The place to address DA's is at the Ballot Box, not Federal Court. And yes, some of them did get voted out for not pursuing rogue cops... McGinty, McCollough, Alverez.

A Modest Proposal for Prosecutors Who Lie - Econlib

We will get there.

Some prefer UHC over wars all over the globe. Why more do not, I do not understand.

First, it's not an either/or proposition. While I think we've done some dumb things in the War on Terror, uh, after 9/11, how do you NOT go after Al Qaeda? As long as we love oil and the Zionists have the political influence they have, we are going to fight wars. Sorry.

For UHC, yes, I support it. A lot of people don't. They are happy with their current insurance. They don't like subsidizing other people's unhealthy lifestyles. People thought the ACA was going too far, not that it didn't go far enough.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.
 
A step up from doing nothing.

actually, no, it could be worse. What if they prosecute, let's say, Darren Wilson after the County acquitted him. The first thing he has to do is put the DA for that county on the stand.

There are a ton of DA's that need to be put on the stand to explain their defense of murderous police officers.

Great. LOL, you prove a point I've long made. The difference between Bush/Obama/Trump/Hillary are small.


Um, yeah, they are at where 99% of the population is at. The part of the population that doesn't want to live on a commune and eat their dogs.

I honestly think that in 2016, most of the "support" for Commie Bernie wasn't an acceptance of the crazy shit he believes, but just people not liking how Hillary strong-armed her way into the nomination.

This year, he performed worse in every contest than he did in 2016.

Some prefer UHC over wars all over the globe. Why more do not, I do not understand.


There are no Murderous Police Officers being defended by D.A. 's - Grow the fuck up
More People do not want Socialized Medicine because it has been proven to be inferior - all over the world.
 
A step up from doing nothing.

actually, no, it could be worse. What if they prosecute, let's say, Darren Wilson after the County acquitted him. The first thing he has to do is put the DA for that county on the stand.

There are a ton of DA's that need to be put on the stand to explain their defense of murderous police officers.

Great. LOL, you prove a point I've long made. The difference between Bush/Obama/Trump/Hillary are small.


Um, yeah, they are at where 99% of the population is at. The part of the population that doesn't want to live on a commune and eat their dogs.

I honestly think that in 2016, most of the "support" for Commie Bernie wasn't an acceptance of the crazy shit he believes, but just people not liking how Hillary strong-armed her way into the nomination.

This year, he performed worse in every contest than he did in 2016.

Some prefer UHC over wars all over the globe. Why more do not, I do not understand.


There are no Murderous Police Officers being defended by D.A. 's - Grow the fuck up
More People do not want Socialized Medicine because it has been proven to be inferior - all over the world.

Its what we have now. Its just done poorly. Many benefitting do not contribute.

Its been asked before and avoided so.......

If someone goes to the hospital and doesn't have health care, who pays?
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.

Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.


. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.

You are vying for the award of most retarded fuck on here, yes?
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.

Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?


That is factually false
In fact he soundly defeated more than a dozen more experienced Republicans, not just her.

He was firmly on the correct side of every issue.
Still is.
 
Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?

Um, yeah, actually. Being a good politician and being a good administrator aren't the same thing.

But going back to your boy Commie Bernie, he's lost twice at this, he's been in Congress for 30 years and he doesn't have ONE BILL with his name on it that got turned into a law... But you think THIS guy was going to be able to run the country.
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.

Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?


That is factually false
In fact he soundly defeated more than a dozen more experienced Republicans, not just her.

He was firmly on the correct side of every issue.
Still is.

Republicans that had voted for stupid wars and 21 trillion in debt. The bar wasn't set very high.
 
Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?

Um, yeah, actually. Being a good politician and being a good administrator aren't the same thing.

But going back to your boy Commie Bernie, he's lost twice at this, he's been in Congress for 30 years and he doesn't have ONE BILL with his name on it that got turned into a law... But you think THIS guy was going to be able to run the country.

I addressed this. People aren't interested in health care and equality for all. I can't explain it.
 

Meh, not really. We actually tried that in Illinois in the Rolando Cruz case. That was a case where cops and prosecutors manufactured evidence against Cruz even though they knew someone else had confessed to the crime. A special prosecutor brought charges, and not only were they all acquitted, the Jury went out and had drinks with them after the case.

The problem in the BLM cases isn't that prosecutors lied, it was that they gave the cops the benefit of every doubt... in short, they acted more like defense lawyers than prosecutors.

Your arguments have been "Yeah, Obama didn't do enough and Yeah, the wars Hillary supported were a mistake" but yet you feel a need to defend them. Not me.

Of course not, you support Commie Bernie and People's Tribunals where Enemies of the People will be shot behind walls.

Biden doesn't support UHC, supported the stupid wars, doesn't support the actions to reform the police but I should still support him according to you. No.

Um, yeah. Because he'll do more to get to those goals than Trump will.

It's like all you stupid fucks who supported Ralph Nader in 2000. You got recessions, wars, the Patriot Act, Gitmo, etc. But man, you showed them.... that Al Gore wasn't far enough to the left.

Same thing here. DO you think we'd be dealing with an inept response to Covid or race riots if Hillary had won? I don't.

Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?


That is factually false
In fact he soundly defeated more than a dozen more experienced Republicans, not just her.

He was firmly on the correct side of every issue.
Still is.

Republicans that had voted for stupid wars and 21 trillion in debt. The bar wasn't set very high.


I laugh
 
Hillary lost to the worse candidate ever to run. You expect that to have been competent?

Um, yeah, actually. Being a good politician and being a good administrator aren't the same thing.

But going back to your boy Commie Bernie, he's lost twice at this, he's been in Congress for 30 years and he doesn't have ONE BILL with his name on it that got turned into a law... But you think THIS guy was going to be able to run the country.

I addressed this. People aren't interested in health care and equality for all. I can't explain it.

No one is selling that.
 
I addressed this. People aren't interested in health care and equality for all. I can't explain it.

Naw, we aren't interested in eating our dogs and busting our asses, only to give it to some welfare queen whose only ambition in life is to make babies and vote for Democrats.

Frankly, Bernie makes a great case for people voting Republican... it's why the Democrats were right to sandbag him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top