The 'Traitor' Takes Election Challenge Straight To The House Of Representatives....

[RetiredGySgt]

6 votes.

One vote is all it takes.

 

[Care4all]

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

And contesting the 2020 Presidential election in Swing States is the president's legal right...thanks for the 'Dem Double Standard' BS display, snowflake....

As I stated, trump lost, not by 6 votes, but 7 million votes, 300,000 thousand and some in the contested battleground states.... He has asked for recounts, his legal option, and he has pursued it in the courts, BOTH have FAILED to put him in the lead, or even remotely close to the lead. His fruitless options, are dried up.... there is no chance that he can overturn the overwhelming results of Biden winning.

Taking it to the House, is not an option of his....

He's just milking his flock, for their money....by pretending he has a shot....$175 million so far....

And none of it, has to be used on legal fees fighting to win....all contributions below $5000 can be used any which way he wants....suckers you are... it seems?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

 

[Care4all]

6 votes.

One vote is all it takes.

Yes, that's correct!

 

[JustAGuy1]

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

And contesting the 2020 Presidential election in Swing States is the president's legal right...thanks for the 'Dem Double Standard' BS display, snowflake....

As I stated, trump lost, not by 6 votes, but 7 million votes, 300,000 thousand and some in the contested battleground states.... He has asked for recounts, his legal option, and he has pursued it in the courts, BOTH have FAILED to put him in the lead, or even remotely close to the lead. His fruitless options, are dried up.... there is no chance that he can overturn the overwhelming results of Biden winning.

Taking it to the House, is not an option of his....

He's just milking his flock, for their money....by pretending he has a shot....$175 million so far....

And none of it, has to be used on legal fees fighting to win....all contributions below $5000 can be used any which way he wants....suckers you are... it seems?

I always try and give you benefit of the doubt but that is no longer warranted. You are desperately, despicably partisan. There is MORE than enough smoke to investigate this fire. Did Rumpy win? I have no earthly idea but he DOES have the "right" to his day in Court. The only thing that these lower courts are doing is putting this on the fast track to the SC. Will they take it up? I have no earthly idea. It will however be put to the Court.

 

[JustAGuy1]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

She is truly disgusting in her abject partisanship.

 

[Care4all]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

He and cohorts, have gone to court 40 times so far, and they have lost or were dismissed for lack of evidence 39 times, so far. When it gets to that many losses in courts from state, appeals, and federal courts, one can safely presume they are frivolous lawsuits of nothingness...imo.

 

[Norman]

Who the hell is going to trust the result of that election?

Especially now that we know "suit case trick" is a thing.

 

[Norman]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

He and cohorts, have gone to court 40 times so far, and they have lost or were dismissed for lack of evidence 39 times, so far. When it gets to that many losses in courts from state, appeals, and federal courts, one can safely presume they are frivolous lawsuits of nothingness...imo.

They haven't been dismissed because lack of evidence, but because of latches, standing... and all kinds of BS. No judge wants to rule on it.

 

[JustAGuy1]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

He and cohorts, have gone to court 40 times so far, and they have lost or were dismissed for lack of evidence 39 times, so far. When it gets to that many losses in courts from state, appeals, and federal courts, one can safely presume they are frivolous lawsuits of nothingness...imo.

Sorry no, one can't. It will be submitted to the SC. We'll just have to see.

 

[Care4all]

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

And contesting the 2020 Presidential election in Swing States is the president's legal right...thanks for the 'Dem Double Standard' BS display, snowflake....

As I stated, trump lost, not by 6 votes, but 7 million votes, 300,000 thousand and some in the contested battleground states.... He has asked for recounts, his legal option, and he has pursued it in the courts, BOTH have FAILED to put him in the lead, or even remotely close to the lead. His fruitless options, are dried up.... there is no chance that he can overturn the overwhelming results of Biden winning.

Taking it to the House, is not an option of his....

He's just milking his flock, for their money....by pretending he has a shot....$175 million so far....

And none of it, has to be used on legal fees fighting to win....all contributions below $5000 can be used any which way he wants....suckers you are... it seems?

I always try and give you benefit of the doubt but that is no longer warranted. You are desperately, despicably partisan. There is MORE than enough smoke to investigate this fire. Did Rumpy win? I have no earthly idea but he DOES have the "right" to his day in Court. The only thing that these lower courts are doing is putting this on the fast track to the SC. Will they take it up? I have no earthly idea. It will however be put to the Court.

I doubt the supreme court will take it up...at this point....

He's had all losses in lower courts, State and Federal.....

And it's not like overturning the election in 1 of those states will give him the presidency, he has to overturn at MINIMUM 3 to 4 state elections.

That just ain't gonna happen, imo.

 

[Care4all]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

He and cohorts, have gone to court 40 times so far, and they have lost or were dismissed for lack of evidence 39 times, so far. When it gets to that many losses in courts from state, appeals, and federal courts, one can safely presume they are frivolous lawsuits of nothingness...imo.

They haven't been dismissed because lack of evidence, but because of latches, standing... and all kinds of BS. No judge wants to rule on it.

If the lower courts don't rule on it, then of course the supreme court will not take the case.

Even if the lower state courts did rule on it, the SC is unlikely to get involved....because the constitution says elections, belong to the States.

 

[Care4all]

If Trump has evidence to show due to fraud or mistakes, showing he could win the election...

Then he better shake a leg, and present it, before the court.... not via tweet, not via Facebook videos, not via crazy press conferences, not via faux state Senate or Legislator hearings,

But In The Courts.... where there has to be, actual EVIDENCE.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

6 votes.

So what? The election is over. She lost. The fact that she is challenging the democratic process is, according to Democrats and snowflakes, a threat to our entire Democracy....unless a Democrat - like gore or Abrams - do it.

Those are her legal, election law, options.... with the 6 vote difference.

There are reasons to have the House do the investigation, they have 30 days to research the thousands of over and under votes, if gone through the court option, that only allowed 7 days, which was not enough time to gather evidence.

The last time the house overturned the results, was in 1984, when they researched a 4 vote difference.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/iowa-democrat-rita-hart-appeals-election-result-to-house.html

An election contest in Iowa would have set in motion the formation of a five-judge panel that would have been required to rule on who won the race by Tuesday, Dec. 8.



Hart’s campaign said that quick timeline would not allow enough time to review all the ballots, including thousands of unexamined undervotes and overvotes and a small number of others that were not counted for a variety of reasons.



Instead, the campaign said that Hart would file an election contest with the U.S. House under the Federal Contested Elections Act in the coming weeks.



Such a filing, due within 30 days after Monday’s certification, will trigger a proceeding in front of the House Committee on Administration that would allow Hart to gather testimony and evidence.


President Trump lost by over 7 million votes

Lost with 300,000 votes in these battleground states, NOT even close to losing by just 6 votes.

President Trump does not have the option of going to the House, under election law...with losing by so much. Plus, it goes to the House, only if no candidate reaches the 270 threshold to win...from my understanding. Biden got to 306.

Yet you oippose Trump going to court in HIS legally allow3ed bid to shed light on suspicious activity in several states. Go figure.

He and cohorts, have gone to court 40 times so far, and they have lost or were dismissed for lack of evidence 39 times, so far. When it gets to that many losses in courts from state, appeals, and federal courts, one can safely presume they are frivolous lawsuits of nothingness...imo.

They haven't been dismissed because lack of evidence, but because of latches, standing... and all kinds of BS. No judge wants to rule on it.

If the lower courts don't rule on it, then of course the supreme court will not take the case.

Even if the lower state courts did rule on it, the SC is unlikely to get involved....because the constitution says elections, belong to the States.

If the lower courts don't rule on it, then of course the supreme court will not take the case.

False. A higher court can review a lower court decision (such as a dismissal) de novo, which literally means "from the beginning," i.e., it is a comprehensive review of the case. It happens all the time in federal court appeals.

Even if the lower state courts did rule on it, the SC is unlikely to get involved....because the constitution says elections, belong to the States.

False. If the lower court decision involves interpretation of state law that impacts a federal right--such as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment (see Bush v. Gore)--then SCOTUS absolutely has jurisdiction to review the case, and does so quite often.