Anyssa Roy
Rookie
- Aug 10, 2016
- 4
- 2
- 1
A friend of mine from Illinois has recently wrote me... Our mutual acquaintance committed suicide a couple of years ago that day. And the reason was her lesbianism. No, there was no public criticism, humiliation or misunderstanding in her family, and she didn't have to keep her habits in secret... It's spiritual illness itself that was the cause. And now this disease infects the whole our country. The scale is frightening. I don't want America to suicide. That's why I've decided to share my friend's article with you.
Lesbian President will lead America to decay and isolation
Very few Americans have not heard of the so-called Hillaryland. However, not many people have wondered what keeps this narrow circle of confidants around the 42nd US President's spouse, what is the basis of their longstanding dedication.
As it’s known, Hillary Clinton's been acquainted with some of her closest advisers (eg. Maggie Williams, Diane Blair and Patti Solis Doyle) since her youth. She first met some others of them during her husband's presidential campaign, as well as in the White House while being the First Lady. However, regardless of how long she knew any of them, the relations established in Hillary Clinton's inner circle seem like familiar rather than working ones. She has thrown them wedding bouquets, gossiped with them, intervened in their medical care, and burped their babies. It's amazing how much involved into their personal lives she is! And to think that all Hillaryland inhabitants are quite successful and self-sufficient people!
As a matter of curiosity, there are no men among the main Democratic presidential candidate's confidants, except for Neel Lattimore who is gay. This fact can only strengthen suspicion that Clinton's inner circle was formed not with regard to one’s professional skills. Isn't it strange that in the whole US she failed to find even one reliable man with the necessary political skills and experience, whose opinions are worth listening to, and who is straight?
Probably, the reason for such the selection of the closest advisers lies in Hillary's childhood memories of rigorous father (in the biography of former First Lady Carl Bernstein wrote that her father regularly humiliated her mother and establish a strict physical discipline in their home), as well as in the details of her adult family life.
For example, since 2004 there are some assumptions about Hillary Clinton's sexual orientation spreading in the media. At the same time one can't claim that these rumors were the part of an organized campaign since there was no reasonable motive for it. On the other hand, how else can one explain the former First Lady's forgiveness toward her husband's numerous adulteries?
In addition, it is believed that Hillary Clinton withdrew from the 2008 presidential race exactly due to the fear that the information on her disreputable relations with women would be revealed. Let's remember that Hilary was against the legalization of gay marriage back then. Besides, she could be afraid of disclosing the exact names of her mistresses.
According to the Weekly World News, an anonymous DoS official has confirmed that Hillary "is a lesbian and the Bill Clinton marriage is just a sham for public consumption."
Then, in 2013, Jennifer Flowers, who had been being Bill Clinton's passion for 12 years at that time, quoted his remarks on Hillary’s lesbianity or bisexuality. By the way, recently one another Bill's former mistress – Sally Miller – told the same thing: "I take him at his word, and he told me that she likes females more than men."
Meanwhile, plausibility of the Flowers' statements is indirectly confirmed by the recordings of her conversations with Bill Clinton, which were published in 1992 (James Carville and George Stephanopoulos have nearly paid a price in a court for their allegations that these records had been tampered with). As for the allegations of Hilary's bisexuality, – no objection have been ever made against them. On the contrary, in the same year (2013) Hillary released a video in support of gay marriage.
Moreover, the correspondence of the then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, revealed in 2015, contains not only evidence of her lesbianity, but also the names of her passions. This case is an eloquent example of her proclivity for not separating work and personal life.
Given the above and the fact that the US president is empowered to receive foreign ambassadors and other public officials, propose legislation and return a bill to Congress for reconsideration, it is extremely undesirable to let Hillary enter into the Oval Office. For example, I wonder whether the Saudis would even talk to her or just stone her after they learn she is a lesbian…
And most importantly, connivance to sodomy on the part of the President will further undermine the foundations of our society and change American people's mentality. Unbridled hedonism, thinking nothing of breaking the laws of nature and God's commandments, will supplant traditional American entrepreneurial spirit and industriousness, and this will inevitably lead the country to decay!
Finally, the arguments of human rights, diversity and equal representation are not applicable in this case. If in the case of Barack Obama his appeal to the racial issue reposes on at least 12.6% of the population, who are African-Americans, in the case of Hillary her belonging to a marginal 1.6% of Americans, who identify themselves as LGBTI, for sure bodes ill to the majority of US citizens.
Lesbian President will lead America to decay and isolation
Very few Americans have not heard of the so-called Hillaryland. However, not many people have wondered what keeps this narrow circle of confidants around the 42nd US President's spouse, what is the basis of their longstanding dedication.
As it’s known, Hillary Clinton's been acquainted with some of her closest advisers (eg. Maggie Williams, Diane Blair and Patti Solis Doyle) since her youth. She first met some others of them during her husband's presidential campaign, as well as in the White House while being the First Lady. However, regardless of how long she knew any of them, the relations established in Hillary Clinton's inner circle seem like familiar rather than working ones. She has thrown them wedding bouquets, gossiped with them, intervened in their medical care, and burped their babies. It's amazing how much involved into their personal lives she is! And to think that all Hillaryland inhabitants are quite successful and self-sufficient people!
As a matter of curiosity, there are no men among the main Democratic presidential candidate's confidants, except for Neel Lattimore who is gay. This fact can only strengthen suspicion that Clinton's inner circle was formed not with regard to one’s professional skills. Isn't it strange that in the whole US she failed to find even one reliable man with the necessary political skills and experience, whose opinions are worth listening to, and who is straight?
Probably, the reason for such the selection of the closest advisers lies in Hillary's childhood memories of rigorous father (in the biography of former First Lady Carl Bernstein wrote that her father regularly humiliated her mother and establish a strict physical discipline in their home), as well as in the details of her adult family life.
For example, since 2004 there are some assumptions about Hillary Clinton's sexual orientation spreading in the media. At the same time one can't claim that these rumors were the part of an organized campaign since there was no reasonable motive for it. On the other hand, how else can one explain the former First Lady's forgiveness toward her husband's numerous adulteries?
In addition, it is believed that Hillary Clinton withdrew from the 2008 presidential race exactly due to the fear that the information on her disreputable relations with women would be revealed. Let's remember that Hilary was against the legalization of gay marriage back then. Besides, she could be afraid of disclosing the exact names of her mistresses.
According to the Weekly World News, an anonymous DoS official has confirmed that Hillary "is a lesbian and the Bill Clinton marriage is just a sham for public consumption."
Then, in 2013, Jennifer Flowers, who had been being Bill Clinton's passion for 12 years at that time, quoted his remarks on Hillary’s lesbianity or bisexuality. By the way, recently one another Bill's former mistress – Sally Miller – told the same thing: "I take him at his word, and he told me that she likes females more than men."
Meanwhile, plausibility of the Flowers' statements is indirectly confirmed by the recordings of her conversations with Bill Clinton, which were published in 1992 (James Carville and George Stephanopoulos have nearly paid a price in a court for their allegations that these records had been tampered with). As for the allegations of Hilary's bisexuality, – no objection have been ever made against them. On the contrary, in the same year (2013) Hillary released a video in support of gay marriage.
Moreover, the correspondence of the then Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, revealed in 2015, contains not only evidence of her lesbianity, but also the names of her passions. This case is an eloquent example of her proclivity for not separating work and personal life.
Given the above and the fact that the US president is empowered to receive foreign ambassadors and other public officials, propose legislation and return a bill to Congress for reconsideration, it is extremely undesirable to let Hillary enter into the Oval Office. For example, I wonder whether the Saudis would even talk to her or just stone her after they learn she is a lesbian…
And most importantly, connivance to sodomy on the part of the President will further undermine the foundations of our society and change American people's mentality. Unbridled hedonism, thinking nothing of breaking the laws of nature and God's commandments, will supplant traditional American entrepreneurial spirit and industriousness, and this will inevitably lead the country to decay!
Finally, the arguments of human rights, diversity and equal representation are not applicable in this case. If in the case of Barack Obama his appeal to the racial issue reposes on at least 12.6% of the population, who are African-Americans, in the case of Hillary her belonging to a marginal 1.6% of Americans, who identify themselves as LGBTI, for sure bodes ill to the majority of US citizens.
