The Republican Conspiricy

We know already. Everything bad is the fault of Reagan and Bush, and all good comes from the Dear Leader. I wonder if even Stalin was blaming the Tsar 30 years on.

Every administration in the nation's history paid attention to keeping the debts in check for more than 200 years until Reagan and the Bushes had to run tax cuts for the wealthy on a credit card. Not too goddam smart.
Would not have been needed if the democrats hadn't cut the military to the point that we were in serious jeopardy. Just so they could enslave the lower caste in America.

I notice you never say anything about the 5 trillion dollars of new debt Obama put into place. A sum that makes it look like Reagan was buying cat food for his mother while Obama is buying Rolls Royces.
 
We know already. Everything bad is the fault of Reagan and Bush, and all good comes from the Dear Leader. I wonder if even Stalin was blaming the Tsar 30 years on.

Every administration in the nation's history paid attention to keeping the debts in check for more than 200 years until Reagan and the Bushes had to run tax cuts for the wealthy on a credit card. Not too goddam smart.

And yet, 2007 was the year in which the federal government collected the most tax revenues in the history of the country...whilst under the so called Bush tax cuts. Laffer Curve 1, Cam zero.

And why is it you conveniently neglect to mention the increase in debt under your dear leader? Hmmm???

What was that about being not so smart?
 
all a man had to do was look at the streets of iraq, look at the people, see the mass graves, see the destruction, see the injustice and deep down, on that dirt street, with those people, with those screams from the dead, he knew this was justified.
 
Republican figures across the nation tell bold faced lies and within hours Fox news repeats them. It's like a mass conspiricy to misinform the public by repeating the same false information so often and so many times that those who know little about everyday happenings are totally screwed. It's always there but since the campaign began it's worse.

Anybody among the Republican supporters who dares to mention the national debt has their head so far up their ass they'll never smell fresh air again. Reagan and the Bushes borrowed 80% of all this great nation has owed in 230 odd years and left an annual interest payment(which unlike the debt must be paid) of half a trillion dollars. It's like the bastards had pulled a Rip Van Winkle and just awakened from a thirty year nap.

Any Republican who criticizes the current administration for it's foreign policy was no doubt continuing their nap when the Bush administration told 1000 lies about Saddam Hussein's "Weapons of Mass Destruction" so they could invade a sovereign nation half way around the world which had done us no harm, get 4500 young Americans killed and waste a trillion dollars. It's like they are in a hermitically sealed bubble and don't know shit from shinola.

war_lies.jpg


Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

You're a very cruel person. Don't you know that FACTS give rw's a rash?
 
We know already. Everything bad is the fault of Reagan and Bush, and all good comes from the Dear Leader. I wonder if even Stalin was blaming the Tsar 30 years on.

Every administration in the nation's history paid attention to keeping the debts in check for more than 200 years until Reagan and the Bushes had to run tax cuts for the wealthy on a credit card. Not too goddam smart.
Would not have been needed if the democrats hadn't cut the military to the point that we were in serious jeopardy. Just so they could enslave the lower caste in America.

I notice you never say anything about the 5 trillion dollars of new debt Obama put into place. A sum that makes it look like Reagan was buying cat food for his mother while Obama is buying Rolls Royces.

$5 trillion Horse shit! You're watching Fox News too much.

The last day of Bush's 2008 budget(Sept. 30, 2009) the interest due and payable on the existing debt was $451 billion. That's billion with a B. that's $451,000,000,000. Each year the interest must be paid. There has been less accumulation of new debt due to government spending under Obama than Bush. It's fascinating how Republicans tell lies and Fox repeats them.

bush-vs-obama-deficit.jpg
 
Last edited:
the deficits also became uncontrolled with the Republican Gingrich House and the Contract for America after more than 40 uninterrupted years of Democratic rule as far back as WWII with modest or no deficits whatsoever.
 
We know already. Everything bad is the fault of Reagan and Bush, and all good comes from the Dear Leader. I wonder if even Stalin was blaming the Tsar 30 years on.

Every administration in the nation's history paid attention to keeping the debts in check for more than 200 years until Reagan and the Bushes had to run tax cuts for the wealthy on a credit card. Not too goddam smart.

Then why is the only time this Country was debt free was for brief period during Andrew Jackson's Presidency? Careful your idiocy is showing.
 
Yeah, that damned Dick Cheney out there by himself convincing America that Saddam Hussein was dangerous. Fucking Republican scumbag.

Oh wait, he had SOME help, check out what all THESE Republicans said...

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Yep, dimwits supported it then played the politics.
 
Many had the balls to claim Saddam was a bad man. Of course. At one time Saddam was our bad man.

But of all the quotes listed above (and Rethugs have used these to justify their stupid decisions) which one of those people had the power to take us to war? And did take us to war?

Who was the prime sales man, going on TV, used to justify the need to invade a country that didn't attack us?

Was his name Bush? Or Cheney?

Do you Rethugs EVER fuking take responsibility for your decisions and actions?? EVER?
More then you idiot libtards, who by the way lied about having sex in the oval office and who are as sitting potus still lying to us. IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top