What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The REAL unsealing of the Search Warrant Affidavit is … when?

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
Although I don’t believe the FBI has ANY valid reason to hide the identity of any alleged confidential informants NOR to keep secret any of their methods of “investigation,” I do recognize that it is unlikely that we will ever get to see the actual affidavits without those things being redacted. But even so …

The massive redactions they made still need to be challenged. And the subject of the search warrant and the American people (in this historic and unprecedented case) deserve to see the affidavit more fully.

The Magistrate allowed the DOJ to propose redactions. As expected, Garland and company went WAY the fuck overboard. Now it’s time for the magistrate judge to exercise some control over this DOJ. With the limited exceptions (maybe) noted above, Judge Reinhardt should order the unsealing of most of the rest of the affidavit and any supporting documents.

Enough is enough. The DOJ doesn’t get to unilaterally decide. The Constitution still reigns supreme.
 

JGalt

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
54,602
Reaction score
56,226
Points
3,635
Although I don’t believe the FBI has ANY valid reason to hide the identity of any alleged confidential informants NOR to keep secret any of their methods of “investigation,” I do recognize that it is unlikely that we will ever get to see the actual affidavits without those things being redacted. But even so …

The massive redactions they made still need to be challenged. And the subject of the search warrant and the American people (in this historic and unprecedented case) deserve to see the affidavit more fully.

The Magistrate allowed the DOJ to propose redactions. As expected, Garland and company went WAY the fuck overboard. Now it’s time for the magistrate judge to exercise some control over this DOJ. With the limited exceptions (maybe) noted above, Judge Reinhardt should order the unsealing of most of the rest of the affidavit and any supporting documents.

Enough is enough. The DOJ doesn’t get to unilaterally decide. The Constitution still reigns supreme.

You're expecting Biden's Secret Police to be transparent? That's not how the Gestapo operates.

BTW, where are you papers?

And pick up that can, citizen.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
103,429
Reaction score
46,605
Points
2,320
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
When the case is closed.

As usual.
 

WEATHER53

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
19,974
Reaction score
10,191
Points
1,265
I too have wondered when the judge who ordered it will declare 95% blacked out as unacceptable
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
You're expecting Biden's Secret Police to be transparent? That's not how the Gestapo operates.

BTW, where are you papers?

And pick up that can, citizen.
Lol. Oh not. Not hardly. But I do expect the justice system to apply the law. Even so, judges do make mistakes. Like authorizing the search warrant in the first place.

I also find it odd that Magistrate Judge Reinhardt also accepted the DOJ’s redactions. I’m not as surprised that the media intervenors haven’t appealed Reinhardt’s order allowing the release only to the extent of the DOJ’s proposed redactions.

But again. No, I wouldn’t expect Garland to be doing his job on the up and up. He needs to get ordered to do so. This case shouldn’t even be before Reinhardt, frankly. A genuine judge has to assume control.
 

MarcATL

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
34,705
Reaction score
13,917
Points
1,590
How do you fix your filthy mouth to say that anyone in the justice system went overboard OP?
  1. Trump took classified documents he had no right to (AKA he stole them)
  2. The DOJ asked Trump nicely to return them
  3. Trump returned some (AKA he lied and said he returned all)
  4. They asked Trump to return the rest
  5. He didn't (AKA Trump wasn't complying)
  6. Then the DOJ took measures to arrange to get them back
  7. Lastly, all with Trump and his lawyers knowledge, and watching them doing so

All this self-victimization. WTF is wrong you liddle piss aunts?!?!
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!

WEATHER53

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
19,974
Reaction score
10,191
Points
1,265
How do you fix your filthy mouth to say that anyone in the justice system went overboard OP?
  1. Trump took classified documents he had no right to (AKA he stole them)
  2. The DOJ asked Trump nicely to return them
  3. Trump returned some (AKA he lied and said he returned all)
  4. They asked Trump to return the rest
  5. He didn't (AKA Trump wasn't complying)
  6. Then the DOJ took measures to arrange to get them back
  7. Lastly, all with Trump and his lawyers knowledge, and watching them doing so

All this self-victimization. WTF is wrong you liddle piss aunts?!?!
Can’t lambaste others when your little list is bullshit
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
How do you fix your filthy mouth
No need for repair, despite your false claim, MalcomExLax.
to say that anyone in the justice system went overboard OP?
I read the papers, you ignorant shit. Even you could do that much.
  1. Trump took classified documents he had no right to (AKA he stole them)
Wrong, assbreath. He retained the papers packed by the GSA. “STEAL” is a legal term with a precise definition and this doesn’t meet that definition, you dolt. Plus, when still President, Trump had declassified them.
  1. The DOJ asked Trump nicely to return them
Maybe. But the parties had been in negotiations. Are you even intelligent to recognize that that reveals? I doubt it.
  1. Trump returned some (AKA he lied and said he returned all)
He did deliver some to the government. You have no support for your additional nonsense (i.e., you’re lying).
  1. They asked Trump to return the rest
Yes. Irrelevant, but yes.
  1. He didn't (AKA Trump wasn't complying)
He was still engaged in negotiations with them, you moron.
  1. Then the DOJ took measures to arrange to get them back
Yes. The DOJ falsely alleged an urgency that obviously didn’t truly exist.
  1. Lastly, all with Trump and his lawyers knowledge, and watching them doing so
You mean they couldn’t secretly break in? Aww. Too bad. So sad, poo-poo. Yes, when armed FBI agents rolled up to execute the search warrant, of course the subject knew of it. So what?
All this self-victimization.
No it isn’t. It’s victimization by the corrupted deep state DOJ.
WTF is wrong you liddle piss aunts?!?!

Wtf is wrong with you, you brains dead gerbil?

And the term isn’t “piss aunt,” you ignorant twat. And learn how to spell. “Liddel?” 😂🤣😂
 

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
57,069
Reaction score
12,517
Points
2,190
Although I don’t believe the FBI has ANY valid reason to hide the identity of any alleged confidential informants NOR to keep secret any of their methods of “investigation,” I do recognize that it is unlikely that we will ever get to see the actual affidavits without those things being redacted. But even so …

The massive redactions they made still need to be challenged. And the subject of the search warrant and the American people (in this historic and unprecedented case) deserve to see the affidavit more fully.

The Magistrate allowed the DOJ to propose redactions. As expected, Garland and company went WAY the fuck overboard. Now it’s time for the magistrate judge to exercise some control over this DOJ. With the limited exceptions (maybe) noted above, Judge Reinhardt should order the unsealing of most of the rest of the affidavit and any supporting documents.

Enough is enough. The DOJ doesn’t get to unilaterally decide. The Constitution still reigns supreme.
Some witnesses testify or give information under the condition of anonymity, so in those cases it would be the DOJ's job to protect them. Also, there is no obligation for law enforcement to publicly release the methods and subjects of their investigation during that investigation. To imply that they need to is absurd. The redactions of the affidavit were to serve the purpose of showing the public that there was probable cause enough to validate a legal search and siezure. Thats what they did. They were not obligated to reveal all. Especially with national security concerns in the mix.
 
Last edited:

Slade3200

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
57,069
Reaction score
12,517
Points
2,190
No need for repair, despite your false claim, MalcomExLax.

I read the papers, you ignorant shit. Even you could do that much.

Wrong, assbreath. He retained the papers packed by the GSA. “STEAL” is a legal term with a precise definition and this doesn’t meet that definition, you dolt. Plus, when still President, Trump had declassified them.

Maybe. But the parties had been in negotiations. Are you even intelligent to recognize that that reveals? I doubt it.

He did deliver some to the government. You have no support for your additional nonsense (i.e., you’re lying).

Yes. Irrelevant, but yes.

He was still engaged in negotiations with them, you moron.

Yes. The DOJ falsely alleged an urgency that obviously didn’t truly exist.

You mean they couldn’t secretly break in? Aww. Too bad. So sad, poo-poo. Yes, when armed FBI agents rolled up to execute the search warrant, of course the subject knew of it. So what?

No it isn’t. It’s victimization by the corrupted deep state DOJ.


Wtf is wrong with you, you brains dead gerbil?

And the term isn’t “piss aunt,” you ignorant twat. And learn how to spell. “Liddel?” 😂🤣😂
Where are you getting your points that Trump declassified the documents and that they were in negotiations? Because I haven't seen any paper trail to back either of those claims up and I've seen a paper trail showing that the events according to how MarcATL laid them out are what happened.
 

MarcATL

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
34,705
Reaction score
13,917
Points
1,590
Where are you getting your points that Trump declassified the documents and that they were in negotiations? Because I haven't seen any paper trail to back either of those claims up and I've seen a paper trail showing that the events according to how MarcATL laid them out are what happened.
Trump's truthing perhaps.

Bootlickers like BackAgain live to suck up Trump's brown farts for oxygen. That's why they are suffering from copium now that he's no longer their Dear Leader, copium is the only thing sustaining their sorry assess....

pepe.jpg
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
Trump's truthing perhaps.

Bootlickers like BackAgain live to suck up Trump's brown farts for oxygen. That's why they are suffering from copium now that he's no longer their Dear Leader, copium is the only thing sustaining their sorry assess....

pepe.jpg
Ah. Poor befuddled and perpetually retarded asshole, MalcolmExLax, is having his period.

Cramping has him whining and crying like the little bitch he always is. And he can’t even touch on the topic.

The redactions are absurd. But, I’m sure scum-sucking idiots like MalcolmExLax prefer it when the government plays such filthy games.
 

MarcATL

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
34,705
Reaction score
13,917
Points
1,590
Ah. Poor befuddled and perpetually retarded asshole, MalcolmExLax, is having his period.

Cramping has him whining and crying like the little bitch he always is. And he can’t even touch on the topic.

The redactions are absurd. But, I’m sure scum-sucking idiots like MalcolmExLax prefer it when the government plays such filthy games.
How do they taste bootlicker....?

Fr7_NlLa_400x400.jpg
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
How do they taste bootlicker....?

Fr7_NlLa_400x400.jpg
I wouldn’t know. I’m not a scumbag like you are, libtard. And you’re still off topic.

But I guess you just don’t care. Rules don’t apply to you, because you think you’re special. 😂🤣😂🤣
 

Whodatsaywhodat.

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
5,905
Reaction score
5,975
Points
1,938
Although I don’t believe the FBI has ANY valid reason to hide the identity of any alleged confidential informants NOR to keep secret any of their methods of “investigation,” I do recognize that it is unlikely that we will ever get to see the actual affidavits without those things being redacted. But even so …

The massive redactions they made still need to be challenged. And the subject of the search warrant and the American people (in this historic and unprecedented case) deserve to see the affidavit more fully.

The Magistrate allowed the DOJ to propose redactions. As expected, Garland and company went WAY the fuck overboard. Now it’s time for the magistrate judge to exercise some control over this DOJ. With the limited exceptions (maybe) noted above, Judge Reinhardt should order the unsealing of most of the rest of the affidavit and any supporting documents.

Enough is enough. The DOJ doesn’t get to unilaterally decide. The Constitution still reigns supreme.
Not true . Democrats are different . They follow no rules, and there are zero consequences.
 
OP
BackAgain

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
18,175
Reaction score
18,127
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
Not true . Democrats are different . They follow no rules, and there are zero consequences.
Well, I guess I stand corrected. This is where things need to be changed.
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top