Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No the problem is YOU
I literally can't look at your stuff without my eyes glazing over. Sweet Jeebus, I get it. You're obsessed, you're butthurt, you're stupid. No need to harp on it.
Tell you what. If I promise to never debunk your stupidity again, will you stop?
No the problem is YOU
I literally can't look at your stuff without my eyes glazing over. Sweet Jeebus, I get it. You're obsessed, you're butthurt, you're stupid. No need to harp on it.
Tell you what. If I promise to never debunk your stupidity again, will you stop?
Your defeat is accepted.
Nice copy and paste....a lot of unproven allegations....the chief problem is, of course, the very thing that the writer accuses others of..the taking of a date point of two...and making a whole premise based on that one data point. It is getting warmer and the polar ice is melting...since that is observable fact...the scramble for a reason is moot....and of interest only to those who have no chance of living long enough to find out how wrong they were.Townhall
The Real Climate Science Deniers
Paul Driessen
Posted: May 16, 2020
Excerpt:
Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that pollution, often dramatically.
I didn’t buy into the 1970 end-is-nigh, doom-and-gloom, billions-will-die hysteria that Ron Stein and Ron Bailey summarize, including the manmade global cooling crisis. I don’t buy it today, either – certainly not this year’s Earth Day focus on the alleged manmade global warming crisis, also blamed on emissions of carbon dioxide, the same gas that humans and animals exhale, and plants use to grow. We’re told the crisis is unprecedented, and poses existential threats to humanity and planet. What nonsense.
But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before.
The “highest ever” temperatures are a mere few tenths or even hundredths of a degree above previous records set many decades ago. The United States recently enjoyed a record 12-year respite from Category 3-5 hurricanes, ended finally by Harvey and Irma in 2017. Violent tornadoes were far fewer during the last 35 years than during the 35 years before that, and the complete absence of violent twisters in 2018 was unprecedented in US history. Modern day floods and droughts were certainly no worse than past floods or the multi-decade droughts that devastated Anasazi, Mayan and other civilizations.
LINK
=============
Warmist/alarmists habitually ignore past climates of thousands years ago. That is why they are do gosh darn IGNORANT!
As for the great profits in the climate change business...they are dwarfed by the monetary interests of those who cling to the status quo...trying to milk every last drop from the existing economic paradigm..before being forced to change.
Nice copy and paste....a lot of unproven allegations....the chief problem is, of course, the very thing that the writer accuses others of..the taking of a date point of two...and making a whole premise based on that one data point. It is getting warmer and the polar ice is melting...since that is observable fact...the scramble for a reason is moot....and of interest only to those who have no chance of living long enough to find out how wrong they were.Townhall
The Real Climate Science Deniers
Paul Driessen
Posted: May 16, 2020
Excerpt:
Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that pollution, often dramatically.
I didn’t buy into the 1970 end-is-nigh, doom-and-gloom, billions-will-die hysteria that Ron Stein and Ron Bailey summarize, including the manmade global cooling crisis. I don’t buy it today, either – certainly not this year’s Earth Day focus on the alleged manmade global warming crisis, also blamed on emissions of carbon dioxide, the same gas that humans and animals exhale, and plants use to grow. We’re told the crisis is unprecedented, and poses existential threats to humanity and planet. What nonsense.
But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before.
The “highest ever” temperatures are a mere few tenths or even hundredths of a degree above previous records set many decades ago. The United States recently enjoyed a record 12-year respite from Category 3-5 hurricanes, ended finally by Harvey and Irma in 2017. Violent tornadoes were far fewer during the last 35 years than during the 35 years before that, and the complete absence of violent twisters in 2018 was unprecedented in US history. Modern day floods and droughts were certainly no worse than past floods or the multi-decade droughts that devastated Anasazi, Mayan and other civilizations.
LINK
=============
Warmist/alarmists habitually ignore past climates of thousands years ago. That is why they are do gosh darn IGNORANT!
As for the great profits in the climate change business...they are dwarfed by the monetary interests of those who cling to the status quo...trying to milk every last drop from the existing economic paradigm..before being forced to change.
Yes, I find it amazing how climate change deniers avoid accurate sources of data.
For example:
Current Warming Is Unparalleled in the Past 2,000 Years
Today’s climate change is unique in its global scale compared to other historical periodswww.scientificamerican.com
Excerpt:
"Skeptics of human-caused climate change have often relied on a favorite argument involving the planet’s natural climate cycles. Earth experienced plenty of natural warming and cooling phases long before humans ever began pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, they’ve suggested—so the present-day warming isn’t necessarily dangerous or even that unusual.
Scientists have debunked this argument over and over again. Studies demonstrate that carbon dioxide concentrations are currently higher than they’ve been at any point in human history, global temperatures are rising at unprecedented rates,...
"Now, scientists have discovered that it’s not just the temperatures themselves that are so unusual. That they’re rising all over the world is also unique in at least the past 2,000 years."
See the whole article if you consider "Nature" magazine an accurate scientific source - ditto "Nature Geoscience." A summary of the two scholarly articles:
"Taken together, the two papers indicate that present-day warming is both more severe and more globally unified than any period of climate change that’s occurred in at least two millennia."
Nice copy and paste....a lot of unproven allegations....the chief problem is, of course, the very thing that the writer accuses others of..the taking of a date point of two...and making a whole premise based on that one data point. It is getting warmer and the polar ice is melting...since that is observable fact...the scramble for a reason is moot....and of interest only to those who have no chance of living long enough to find out how wrong they were.Townhall
The Real Climate Science Deniers
Paul Driessen
Posted: May 16, 2020
Excerpt:
Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that pollution, often dramatically.
I didn’t buy into the 1970 end-is-nigh, doom-and-gloom, billions-will-die hysteria that Ron Stein and Ron Bailey summarize, including the manmade global cooling crisis. I don’t buy it today, either – certainly not this year’s Earth Day focus on the alleged manmade global warming crisis, also blamed on emissions of carbon dioxide, the same gas that humans and animals exhale, and plants use to grow. We’re told the crisis is unprecedented, and poses existential threats to humanity and planet. What nonsense.
But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before.
The “highest ever” temperatures are a mere few tenths or even hundredths of a degree above previous records set many decades ago. The United States recently enjoyed a record 12-year respite from Category 3-5 hurricanes, ended finally by Harvey and Irma in 2017. Violent tornadoes were far fewer during the last 35 years than during the 35 years before that, and the complete absence of violent twisters in 2018 was unprecedented in US history. Modern day floods and droughts were certainly no worse than past floods or the multi-decade droughts that devastated Anasazi, Mayan and other civilizations.
LINK
=============
Warmist/alarmists habitually ignore past climates of thousands years ago. That is why they are do gosh darn IGNORANT!
As for the great profits in the climate change business...they are dwarfed by the monetary interests of those who cling to the status quo...trying to milk every last drop from the existing economic paradigm..before being forced to change.
Yes, I find it amazing how climate change deniers avoid accurate sources of data.
For example:
Current Warming Is Unparalleled in the Past 2,000 Years
Today’s climate change is unique in its global scale compared to other historical periods
Excerpt:
"Skeptics of human-caused climate change have often relied on a favorite argument involving the planet’s natural climate cycles. Earth experienced plenty of natural warming and cooling phases long before humans ever began pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, they’ve suggested—so the present-day warming isn’t necessarily dangerous or even that unusual.
Scientists have debunked this argument over and over again. Studies demonstrate that carbon dioxide concentrations are currently higher than they’ve been at any point in human history, global temperatures are rising at unprecedented rates,...
"Now, scientists have discovered that it’s not just the temperatures themselves that are so unusual. That they’re rising all over the world is also unique in at least the past 2,000 years."
See the whole article if you consider "Nature" magazine an accurate scientific source - ditto "Nature Geoscience." A summary of the two scholarly articles:
"Taken together, the two papers indicate that present-day warming is both more severe and more globally unified than any period of climate change that’s occurred in at least two millennia."
Ha ha,
Neither YOU or EvilEyeFleegle actually address the post, just babble all around as you just did here.
The article remains unchallenged.
Nice copy and paste....a lot of unproven allegations....the chief problem is, of course, the very thing that the writer accuses others of..the taking of a date point of two...and making a whole premise based on that one data point. It is getting warmer and the polar ice is melting...since that is observable fact...the scramble for a reason is moot....and of interest only to those who have no chance of living long enough to find out how wrong they were.Townhall
The Real Climate Science Deniers
Paul Driessen
Posted: May 16, 2020
Excerpt:
Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that pollution, often dramatically.
I didn’t buy into the 1970 end-is-nigh, doom-and-gloom, billions-will-die hysteria that Ron Stein and Ron Bailey summarize, including the manmade global cooling crisis. I don’t buy it today, either – certainly not this year’s Earth Day focus on the alleged manmade global warming crisis, also blamed on emissions of carbon dioxide, the same gas that humans and animals exhale, and plants use to grow. We’re told the crisis is unprecedented, and poses existential threats to humanity and planet. What nonsense.
But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before.
The “highest ever” temperatures are a mere few tenths or even hundredths of a degree above previous records set many decades ago. The United States recently enjoyed a record 12-year respite from Category 3-5 hurricanes, ended finally by Harvey and Irma in 2017. Violent tornadoes were far fewer during the last 35 years than during the 35 years before that, and the complete absence of violent twisters in 2018 was unprecedented in US history. Modern day floods and droughts were certainly no worse than past floods or the multi-decade droughts that devastated Anasazi, Mayan and other civilizations.
LINK
=============
Warmist/alarmists habitually ignore past climates of thousands years ago. That is why they are do gosh darn IGNORANT!
As for the great profits in the climate change business...they are dwarfed by the monetary interests of those who cling to the status quo...trying to milk every last drop from the existing economic paradigm..before being forced to change.
Yes, I find it amazing how climate change deniers avoid accurate sources of data.
For example:
Current Warming Is Unparalleled in the Past 2,000 Years
Today’s climate change is unique in its global scale compared to other historical periods
Excerpt:
"Skeptics of human-caused climate change have often relied on a favorite argument involving the planet’s natural climate cycles. Earth experienced plenty of natural warming and cooling phases long before humans ever began pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, they’ve suggested—so the present-day warming isn’t necessarily dangerous or even that unusual.
Scientists have debunked this argument over and over again. Studies demonstrate that carbon dioxide concentrations are currently higher than they’ve been at any point in human history, global temperatures are rising at unprecedented rates,...
"Now, scientists have discovered that it’s not just the temperatures themselves that are so unusual. That they’re rising all over the world is also unique in at least the past 2,000 years."
See the whole article if you consider "Nature" magazine an accurate scientific source - ditto "Nature Geoscience." A summary of the two scholarly articles:
"Taken together, the two papers indicate that present-day warming is both more severe and more globally unified than any period of climate change that’s occurred in at least two millennia."
Ha ha,
Neither YOU or EvilEyeFleegle actually address the post, just babble all around as you just did here.
The article remains unchallenged.
www.pnas.org
www.pnas.org
www.nature.com
To me, the funniest thing is that the Vostok ice cores are a data set over several hundred thousand years and show CO2 LAGGING, not driving temperature on the increase AND decrease, yet our AGW Cult now insists that modern CO2 is now a driver of temperature
To me, the funniest thing is that the Vostok ice cores are a data set over several hundred thousand years and show CO2 LAGGING, not driving temperature on the increase AND decrease, yet our AGW Cult now insists that modern CO2 is now a driver of temperature
Yes Frank, we know you can't grasp that CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback. It's middle-school level science, hence it's way over your head.
What we find funny is how you think that everyone else must be just as stupid as you are. Rest assured that's not the case.
The article remains unchallenged.
Sure, Brah.To me, the funniest thing is that the Vostok ice cores are a data set over several hundred thousand years and show CO2 LAGGING, not driving temperature on the increase AND decrease, yet our AGW Cult now insists that modern CO2 is now a driver of temperature
Yes Frank, we know you can't grasp that CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback. It's middle-school level science, hence it's way over your head.
What we find funny is how you think that everyone else must be just as stupid as you are. Rest assured that's not the case.
Also, the data set I posted covers 450,000 years, your AGW Cult is claiming that CO2 started acting differently 120 years ago. Great claims require a ton of AGW Cult BSTo me, the funniest thing is that the Vostok ice cores are a data set over several hundred thousand years and show CO2 LAGGING, not driving temperature on the increase AND decrease, yet our AGW Cult now insists that modern CO2 is now a driver of temperature
Yes Frank, we know you can't grasp that CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback. It's middle-school level science, hence it's way over your head.
What we find funny is how you think that everyone else must be just as stupid as you are. Rest assured that's not the case.
Also, the data set I posted covers 450,000 years,
your AGW Cult is claiming that CO2 started acting differently 120 years ago.
Also, the data set I posted covers 450,000 years,
So? CO2 was a forcing and a feedback. CO2 is still a forcing and a feedback. Nothing has changed.
your AGW Cult is claiming that CO2 started acting differently 120 years ago.
No, you're the only person I've seen here or anywhere making such a hilariously stupid claim. Don't ask us to explain your weird religious beliefs.
