the people that signed affidavits.. what happens to them... ?

washamericom

Gold Member
Jun 19, 2010
13,703
1,904
245
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm from now on..

if so why ? is this fair and right and ok with the democrats now ?

 
Last edited:
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
Expect every Red rural county to have 100,000,000 new voters, and when somebody bitches about it????

BASELESS

NOT TRUE

NO EVIDENCE!!!
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..



if so why ?
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
thats the democrat way,,,

not a single person that signed an affidavit was allowed to testify in court under oath,, whats worse is those accused were never confronted about the claims,,
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
Expect every Red rural county to have 100,000,000 new voters, and when somebody bitches about it????

BASELESS

NOT TRUE

NO EVIDENCE!!!
google really smothers that search with liberal results... why is that. can afidavits be evidence in a court of law or not. it's a pretty simple American pertinent question...
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?

They should be vetted out in court
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
thats the democrat way,,,

not a single person that signed an affidavit was allowed to testify in court under oath,, whats worse is those accused were never confronted about the claims,,
standing...
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?

They should be vetted out in court
they will be, like no one has ever seen before, that i can tell ya. it's one thing they cannot touch.
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?

They should be vetted out in court
they will be, like no one has ever seen before, that i can tell ya. it's one thing they cannot touch.
It’s a road to nowhere. Trump totally over played it... just like the Dems and Russia
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
Expect every Red rural county to have 100,000,000 new voters, and when somebody bitches about it????

BASELESS

NOT TRUE

NO EVIDENCE!!!
google really smothers that search with liberal results... why is that. can afidavits be evidence in a court of law or not. it's a pretty simple American pertinent question...
Affidavits can be evidence sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. AND THEY SHOULD HAVE!!!

Only then, can witnesses be allowed to testify.

It was the biggest judicial scam in the history of America.
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
Expect every Red rural county to have 100,000,000 new voters, and when somebody bitches about it????

BASELESS

NOT TRUE

NO EVIDENCE!!!
google really smothers that search with liberal results... why is that. can afidavits be evidence in a court of law or not. it's a pretty simple American pertinent question...
Affidavits can be evidence sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. AND THEY SHOULD HAVE!!!

Only then, can witnesses be allowed to testify.

It was the biggest judicial scam in the history of America.
Biggest judicial scam huh? Who coordinated it and how did they get Trump appointed judges to play along?
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?
Expect every Red rural county to have 100,000,000 new voters, and when somebody bitches about it????

BASELESS

NOT TRUE

NO EVIDENCE!!!
google really smothers that search with liberal results... why is that. can afidavits be evidence in a court of law or not. it's a pretty simple American pertinent question...
Affidavits can be evidence sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss. AND THEY SHOULD HAVE!!!

Only then, can witnesses be allowed to testify.

It was the biggest judicial scam in the history of America.

Yes, it was the biggest Conspiracy of the 21st century. To prevent if from happening again, break out the Reynolds Aluminum Foil. Tin Foil is just so yesterday in the conspiracy world of today.
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?

They should be vetted out in court
they will be, like no one has ever seen before, that i can tell ya. it's one thing they cannot touch.
It’s a road to nowhere. Trump totally over played it... just like the Dems and Russia
very American...media and democrats need the conservatives to just move on... guess that's it then.. duh... ok.
 
they were summarily dismissed as lying fuckers.
what about them. fake media had bidens' (plural) back... afidavits aren't evidence they reported.

where does that leave the guy who drove a semi truck of ballots across state lines ?

is that the norm fro. now on..

if so why ?

They should be vetted out in court
they will be, like no one has ever seen before, that i can tell ya. it's one thing they cannot touch.
It’s a road to nowhere. Trump totally over played it... just like the Dems and Russia
very American...media and democrats need the conservatives to just move on... guess that's it then.. duh... ok.
Not at all. Just had enough with lies and over politicize hyperbole
 
The SC spat in the face of the states and said they'll do nothing for redress. Rs better start producing more ballots and play the rig game if they ever want to win another election.

Funny wasn’t it?
Even far right conservative judges would not buy in to the unfounded election fraud lies.
Conservative lawyers were unwilling to to specifically claim there was election fraud
 

Forum List

Back
Top