The painful truth about Ahmaud Arberry

you called it a "deadly threat
anybody holding a gun is a deadly threat to someone attacking them

that's why it's so important to carry a gun when chasing a potentially dangerous criminal

welcome to America
 
His prior record had nothing to do with him on that property or the subsequent events which unfolded
If People's "prior record" doesn't matter how come they do background checks?

Ahmaud Arberry what is a mentally retarded Street criminal with a history of gun and theft crimes including threatening his own mother to such a degree even she had to call the cops

Recently diagnosed as hearing voices a mentally deranged Street criminal attacked two Good Samaritans trying to protect her neighborhood after a short Chase failed to detain him

View attachment 454635
Who did the background check?
 
Travis McMichael shouldered his shotgun in a warning to Maude not to attack him yet NEVER ACTUALLY POINTED the firearm at him

That only matters to KKK wannabe dipshits.

From a legal standpoint (you know, the "standpoint" you've been ignoring for almost 2,500 posts), there's no distinction...
 
He had no duty to stop for them or to answer their questions
Any decent citizen unlawfully entering another person's property for any reason whatsoever should expect to be confronted

maude was an experienced Street Criminal on probation who knew he wasn't supposed to be in that house

He fled from Travis McMichael just a couple days prior to the incident when Travis noticed him illegally entering the house and reached in his waistband in a movement associated with gun retention
 
Arbery reached his truck. You said so yourself
Anybody holding a firearm is a deadly threat to anyone that attacks them

There's absolutely no way that Travis would have hurt Maude if he had just kept running

it's an absolutely ridiculous notion that Travis shot him just because he didn't want him to get away because he had lots of other chances to shoot him before the final incident
 
there's no distinction
There's a huge difference between holding a gun vs threatening somebody with a gun

travis never even aimed his gun at maude on the video and all the autopsy trajectories have proved that the projectiles were moving upward meaning the gun was being fought over when it discharged

The injury on the wrist of was also synonymous with an attempt to grab

You guys are hilarious to hold on to the innocent black jogger narrative when it's so obvious that a mentally retarded Street criminal tried to grab someones SHOTGUN and got killed trying to forcibly dislodge it from a professionally trained military operator

41qj4y.jpg
 
it's an absolutely ridiculous notion that Travis shot him just because he didn't want him to get away because he had lots of other chances to shoot him before the final incident

The fact that he didn't shoot him prior to that is utterly meaningless.

I would love to see Travis McMichael's attorney offer that up as proof that Travis didn't intend to kill him...
 
He had no duty to stop for them or to answer their questions
Any decent citizen unlawfully entering another person's property for any reason whatsoever should expect to be confronted

maude was an experienced Street Criminal on probation who knew he wasn't supposed to be in that house

He fled from Travis McMichael just a couple days prior to the incident when Travis noticed him illegally entering the house and reached in his waistband in a movement associated with gun retention
Decency matters not. He had no duty to stop for them or answer any of their questions. That they refused to accept that until they felt the need to pull a gun on him to intimidate him into stopping is part of the reason they're facing murder charges now.
 
Arbery reached his truck. You said so yourself
Anybody holding a firearm is a deadly threat to anyone that attacks them

There's absolutely no way that Travis would have hurt Maude if he had just kept running

it's an absolutely ridiculous notion that Travis shot him just because he didn't want him to get away because he had lots of other chances to shoot him before the final incident
You altered my post which is against forum rules. You should stop doing that. I didn't say, "Arbery reached his truck," I said, "before Arbery reached his truck."

And you have no evidence Travis wouldn't have hurt Arbery had he just kept on running. Even worse for the McMichaels' case, Arbery didn't have to assume he wouldn't be hurt if he just kept running. Because Travis was a deadly threat to Arbery before that point, Arbery was within his legal rights to defend himself to any extent necessary to end the threat. Which is what he tried to do until Travis murdered him.
 
there's no distinction
There's a huge difference between holding a gun vs threatening somebody with a gun

travis never even aimed his gun at maude on the video and all the autopsy trajectories have proved that the projectiles were moving upward meaning the gun was being fought over when it discharged

The injury on the wrist of was also synonymous with an attempt to grab

You guys are hilarious to hold on to the innocent black jogger narrative when it's so obvious that a mentally retarded Street criminal tried to grab someones SHOTGUN and got killed trying to forcibly dislodge it from a professionally trained military operator

View attachment 454736
And even you said Travis was a deadly threat.
 
You altered my post which is against forum rules.
NOPE
Lying skeeve. I posted....

Travis was a deadly threat to Arbery before Arbery reached his truck. You said so yourself.

You edited that and posted...

Arbery reached his truck. You said so yourself​
Why would anybody intentionally edit a post like that?

you're such a flaming drama queen you think an editing glitch is a dramatic attempt to skew the narrative and posing a deadly threat to someone whos attacking you is a crime

Are you 12?
 

Forum List

Back
Top