bucs90
Gold Member
- Feb 25, 2010
- 26,545
- 6,027
- 280
I had about enough with the President of the United States taking leadership in NOTHING except being the Blamer In Chief.
By God, if the man is good at anything, it's giving speeches and placing blame.
He's blamed Bush, of course. Blamed the Tea Party. Blamed tsunamis and earthquakes. Blamed rich people. Then blamed rich people again. Then blamed rich people one last time for good measure. Then blamed Wall Street and corporations, and then threw in one last jab at rich people. He's pointed out all the things he considers problems and reasons for our woes. He's pointed to the past, of course, and to the future "head winds" whatever in the hell that means.
But my question is......isn't the reason we elect and entrust a president TO HANDLE ALL THESE THINGS?
C'mon Mr. President. Enough blame. More leadership and solutions. When even the black caucus becomes racist and starts to oppose you, then you know there is trouble.
By God, if the man is good at anything, it's giving speeches and placing blame.
He's blamed Bush, of course. Blamed the Tea Party. Blamed tsunamis and earthquakes. Blamed rich people. Then blamed rich people again. Then blamed rich people one last time for good measure. Then blamed Wall Street and corporations, and then threw in one last jab at rich people. He's pointed out all the things he considers problems and reasons for our woes. He's pointed to the past, of course, and to the future "head winds" whatever in the hell that means.
But my question is......isn't the reason we elect and entrust a president TO HANDLE ALL THESE THINGS?
C'mon Mr. President. Enough blame. More leadership and solutions. When even the black caucus becomes racist and starts to oppose you, then you know there is trouble.
