The new Reagan administration? Blinken says US will respond to reckless Moscow (Evil empire) acts/ Navalny, Solar Winds, election interference.

Litwin

Platinum Member
Sep 3, 2017
31,399
4,662
1,015
GDL&Sweden

The new Reagan administration? Blinken says US will respond to reckless Moscow (Evil empire) acts/ Navalny, Solar Winds, election interference.​

does it mean that The Free World finally got the clear view of Moscow Evil empire ? and knows what to do ?


 
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
 
Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII, the CCP will guide the USA to declare war on Russia and for the same reasons: Stalin owned FDR, Xi owns Biden
 
Last edited:
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

1620317564739.png
 
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.
 
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.
History may record us opening them up with most favored nation status and one way total trade deals and the ability to produce all the goods we need as a fateful error for our nation. Add in the transfer of or technology and the direction is clear.
 
Despite all the evidence on China being our number 1 threat.....this biden regime continues to attempt to ignite a new cold war with russia and thus force them to unite with China.

Which would be disastrous for us.....
 
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649

China walked into Hong Kong, changed laws, arrested pro-West citizens and laughed at the West. Russia went into Crimea after a trumped up referendum.

In both cases, the West lost their reputation for being the defender of free citizens. In the case of Russia, Obama listened to bad intel who told him that arming Ukraine would upset Russia (well no shyte, isn't that the point?). Obama threw Russia out of the G8 as punishment.

In the case of China, it was so brazen and without consequences that it desperately weakened the UK and USA. What consequences have come from this? Any arguing that China should be thrown out of the WTO or UN? They are laughing loudly, once again violating their own agreement with England to allow HK to be independent and autonomous until 2047. What a steal for China. Great economic wealth and control over this wealth.

You tell me, which action made the West look weakest? Which action had the most consequences for the aggressor?

We are losing to China. We are weak and allowing soft, cuck corporate betrayers to control politicians and NOT confront the obvious danger. The worst threat to the West in Americas history since she achieved Independence.
"China walked into Hong Kong" No , UK delivered Hong Kong to China according 100 year - old agreement. No even close to what Moscow does in Ukraine today
 
Despite all the evidence on China being our number 1 threat.....this biden regime continues to attempt to ignite a new cold war with russia and thus force them to unite with China.

Which would be disastrous for us.....
"russia and thus force them to unite with China." LOL, you think Moscow will except China´s natural resource colony status ? or it will deliver entire Siberia to the hans ?


 
So they should. Blinken might surprise me. However, Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses. The world knows this, American citizens know this and intelligence agencies know this.

Therefore, if we are going to have more shouting about Russia, while China does as they please (and holds an olympic games as a reward), America risks losing India, Japan, Australia and numerous others. You can't call out a lesser threat and get brownie points while the other gets a free pass. That would be very unReagan like and self destructive.

The way to deal with China isn't to allow them to save face, it isn't to walk on eggshells. it is to confront them loudly, publicly and directly. THAT is what Reagan would do, and why he was the best president in my lifetime. Calling out Russia today, would be like calling out Cuba during Reagans time. Yeah, they are a thorn in the side in the 80s, but they aren't what Russia was then.
"Russia is well beneath the threat that China poses." Moscow did 3 times already what red hans are only planing to do

View attachment 487649
Yea whatever happened to Russia “invading” and taking over Georgia? Oh yea, nothing.

Crimea has always been Russia’s. It never made any sense for it to be a part of Ukraine. The people are Russian and speak Russian, and hate Ukraine. Why do globalist fags like you want people ruled over instead of allowing them to make their own decisions?

And by the way, China has many border disputes and claims. Ask Napal, India, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.
 
Like Stalin ran US war effort in WWII, the CCP will guide the USA to declare war on Russia
", the CCP will guide the USA to declare war on Russia" USA to declare war on Nigeria with snow ? you just be joking

abr26ob_700b.jpg

Xi wants to continue to use Biden to weaken the USA. If we leave Afghanistan he will have Biden get involved with Russia, maybe defending the Ukraine against "Russian aggression"?
 

Forum List

Back
Top