The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked

[Doc7505]

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked​

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked
7/10/2019 ~ By Adrian Norman
In 2017, a memorandum was sent to the White House from a group of former U.S. intelligence officials, including William Binney, former technical director at the National Security Agency (NSA). The team was a veritable who’s who of accredited technical wizards, comprising former top brass from the NSA, CIA, U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Council, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and IBM. The subject of the memo was their forensic analysis of the emails that were allegedly obtained from a hack at the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—a basis for assertions that the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government.
Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.
But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.
Specifically, the report states, “Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.”
After an investigation that had 19 lawyers, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 witnesses interviewed, and more than 230 orders for communication records, not only was there no finding of collusion, conspiracy, or obstruction, we are also still left with a question about how this whole thing started.
Who actually stole the DNC emails?

~~~~~~
Strangely the investigation and the report from Epoch Times didn't mention the fact the neither the FBI or the Mueller team investigated the break-in/hacking. The investigation was supposedly done by CrowdStrike. (themarketswork.com/2018/05/18/the-fbis-outside-contractors-dnc-servers-crowdstrike/).
Hmm..., We're still waiting release of information that the DNC directed hacking of the RNC funded and facilitated by any number of foreign powers or, wait, didn’t Mueller’s team bother to pursue that rabbit trail?
It had been proven that the metadata on the files show a download speed of >49 MegaBits/second. This can only be achieved when downloading to a thumb drive or external drive.
On July 17, 2019 n Wednesday Mueller will appear before the Judiciary Committee. Surely the Democrat Congressional Representatives will be asking these questions? Yeah, sure....no Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat especially Jerry Nadler would touch that question with a twenty foot barge pole....

 

[iceberg]

Meuller also never connected the trolls in Russia to the Russian gov.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

I think the investigation broke muellers spirit

 

[percysunshine]

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked​

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked
7/10/2019 ~ By Adrian Norman
In 2017, a memorandum was sent to the White House from a group of former U.S. intelligence officials, including William Binney, former technical director at the National Security Agency (NSA). The team was a veritable who’s who of accredited technical wizards, comprising former top brass from the NSA, CIA, U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Council, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and IBM. The subject of the memo was their forensic analysis of the emails that were allegedly obtained from a hack at the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—a basis for assertions that the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government.
Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.
But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.
Specifically, the report states, “Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.”
After an investigation that had 19 lawyers, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 witnesses interviewed, and more than 230 orders for communication records, not only was there no finding of collusion, conspiracy, or obstruction, we are also still left with a question about how this whole thing started.
Who actually stole the DNC emails?

~~~~~~
Strangely the investigation and the report from Epoch Times didn't mention the fact the neither the FBI or the Mueller team investigated the break-in/hacking. The investigation was supposedly done by CrowdStrike. (themarketswork.com/2018/05/18/the-fbis-outside-contractors-dnc-servers-crowdstrike/).
Hmm..., We're still waiting release of information that the DNC directed hacking of the RNC funded and facilitated by any number of foreign powers or, wait, didn’t Mueller’s team bother to pursue that rabbit trail?
It had been proven that the metadata on the files show a download speed of >49 MegaBits/second. This can only be achieved when downloading to a thumb drive or external drive.
On July 17, 2019 n Wednesday Mueller will appear before the Judiciary Committee. Surely the Democrat Congressional Representatives will be asking these questions? Yeah, sure....no Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat especially Jerry Nadler would touch that question with a twenty foot barge pole....

Hold on...Podesta was phished.

 

[Doc7505]

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked​

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked
7/10/2019 ~ By Adrian Norman
In 2017, a memorandum was sent to the White House from a group of former U.S. intelligence officials, including William Binney, former technical director at the National Security Agency (NSA). The team was a veritable who’s who of accredited technical wizards, comprising former top brass from the NSA, CIA, U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Council, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and IBM. The subject of the memo was their forensic analysis of the emails that were allegedly obtained from a hack at the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—a basis for assertions that the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government.
Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.
But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.
Specifically, the report states, “Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.”
After an investigation that had 19 lawyers, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 witnesses interviewed, and more than 230 orders for communication records, not only was there no finding of collusion, conspiracy, or obstruction, we are also still left with a question about how this whole thing started.
Who actually stole the DNC emails?

~~~~~~
Strangely the investigation and the report from Epoch Times didn't mention the fact the neither the FBI or the Mueller team investigated the break-in/hacking. The investigation was supposedly done by CrowdStrike. (themarketswork.com/2018/05/18/the-fbis-outside-contractors-dnc-servers-crowdstrike/).
Hmm..., We're still waiting release of information that the DNC directed hacking of the RNC funded and facilitated by any number of foreign powers or, wait, didn’t Mueller’s team bother to pursue that rabbit trail?
It had been proven that the metadata on the files show a download speed of >49 MegaBits/second. This can only be achieved when downloading to a thumb drive or external drive.
On July 17, 2019 n Wednesday Mueller will appear before the Judiciary Committee. Surely the Democrat Congressional Representatives will be asking these questions? Yeah, sure....no Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat especially Jerry Nadler would touch that question with a twenty foot barge pole....

Hold on...Podesta was phished.

~~~~~~
You're correct. He was using the familiar password "Password" he deserved to be phished and outted. Then again this elitist was phished by who?

 

[percysunshine]

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked​

The Mueller Investigation Failed to Provide Evidence That the DNC Was Actually Hacked
7/10/2019 ~ By Adrian Norman
In 2017, a memorandum was sent to the White House from a group of former U.S. intelligence officials, including William Binney, former technical director at the National Security Agency (NSA). The team was a veritable who’s who of accredited technical wizards, comprising former top brass from the NSA, CIA, U.S. Air Force Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Council, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and IBM. The subject of the memo was their forensic analysis of the emails that were allegedly obtained from a hack at the Democratic National Committee (DNC)—a basis for assertions that the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with the Russian government.
Unchallenged allegations of a computer “hack” permeated nearly all mainstream-media coverage of the investigation and were sprinkled throughout much of the final report from special counsel Robert Mueller. The indictment of 12 Russians by Mueller asserts that the emails were obtained through a remote network breach. The indictment drones on and on about a Russian military unit dubbed “Unit 26165” and “X-Agent malware” that supposedly allowed the DNC emails to be compromised.
But analysis of the files themselves (analysis that team Mueller either never conducted or never discussed) shows otherwise.
Specifically, the report states, “Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.”
After an investigation that had 19 lawyers, 2,800 subpoenas, 500 search warrants, 500 witnesses interviewed, and more than 230 orders for communication records, not only was there no finding of collusion, conspiracy, or obstruction, we are also still left with a question about how this whole thing started.
Who actually stole the DNC emails?

~~~~~~
Strangely the investigation and the report from Epoch Times didn't mention the fact the neither the FBI or the Mueller team investigated the break-in/hacking. The investigation was supposedly done by CrowdStrike. (themarketswork.com/2018/05/18/the-fbis-outside-contractors-dnc-servers-crowdstrike/).
Hmm..., We're still waiting release of information that the DNC directed hacking of the RNC funded and facilitated by any number of foreign powers or, wait, didn’t Mueller’s team bother to pursue that rabbit trail?
It had been proven that the metadata on the files show a download speed of >49 MegaBits/second. This can only be achieved when downloading to a thumb drive or external drive.
On July 17, 2019 n Wednesday Mueller will appear before the Judiciary Committee. Surely the Democrat Congressional Representatives will be asking these questions? Yeah, sure....no Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat especially Jerry Nadler would touch that question with a twenty foot barge pole....

Hold on...Podesta was phished.

~~~~~~
You're correct. He was using the familiar password "Password" he deserved to be phished and outted. Then again this elitist was phished by who?

Probably the Ecuadorian Intelligence Agency...who then sold it on Ebay.